You could try making a view for this query and then loading that view. This
will give you simpler syntax in the data-config.xml file. You may find that
the query you are trying is itself wrong.
Using a view also lets you examine the data your are importing.
Lance
On 2/23/09, Noble Paul നോബിള് न
I have seen field collapsing patch (
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 ) has been market for Solr 1.5
but... Has anyone made it work with a recent nightly build ??
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/field-collapsing-in-a-nightly-build-tp22179010p22179010.html
Sent
Hi,
I am trying to achieve field boosting with alt query. I am giving wildcard
in the query and it is working fine and field boosting is working with
normal q query. I want to achieve both with q query. I am able to do
wildcard search with q query but now I am not getting the field boosting
happe
Hi,
I am trying to perform wildcard search using q query.
e.g. If I give tes* as the query, it works fine and returns the results as
expected.
But if I give *tes*, then it throws an exception saying that we cant have
wildcards in front of any string.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Amit Garg
--
Vie
Hi,
I am trying to achieve the field boosting in wild card search. If I do
normal search, then this field boosting works fine but if I use wildcard in
the search string, then it field boosting doesnt work.
Please suggest.
thanks,
Amit garg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble
Hi Amit,
Leading wildcard searches are not allowing in Solr Out-of-the-box. There
are other techniques to overcome this handicap.
Search for "Leading Wildcards" in the user mailing list archives will
return the necessary mail threads which might be pretty useful to you.
-Kumar
-Original Mess
Hi Amit,
Wildcard searches do not support highlighting and rank boosting from
Solr-1.3 onwards.
-Kumar
-Original Message-
From: dabboo [mailto:ag...@sapient.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 4:06 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Field Boosting with wildcard
Hi,
I am t
Hi all,
does anyone have experience with running SOLR on OpenJDK 6.0? Any data points,
positive or negative, would be appreciated. I am trying to decide whether to
switch to OpenJDK on Debian Lenny, or whether to stick with the non-free JDK
5.0 for the time being.
Best regards
- Christian
Hi,
Thanks for the information. But can we achieve wildcards with q query
instead of q.alt parameter.
thanks,
Amit
dabboo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to achieve the field boosting in wild card search. If I do
> normal search, then this field boosting works fine but if I use wildcard
>
Christian Vogler wrote:
Hi all,
does anyone have experience with running SOLR on OpenJDK 6.0? Any data points,
positive or negative, would be appreciated. I am trying to decide whether to
switch to OpenJDK on Debian Lenny, or whether to stick with the non-free JDK
5.0 for the time being.
Be
>
> : I went ahead and added it since it does not hurt anything to escape more
> : things -- it just makes the final string ugly.
>
> : In 1.3 the escape method covered everything:
>
> H good call, i didn't realize the escape method had been so
> blanket in 1.3. this way we protect people
Hi
Sorry I dont remember what is the parameter which show up every parameters
stores in my solrconfig.xml file for the dismax query ? thanks a lot,
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/show-up-every-parameter-in-my-dismax-query-tp22181063p22181063.html
Sent from the Sol
Hi,
I am facing problem when sending a post request with curl.
All the special characters are messed up.
Thanks,
Ajay
sunnyfr wrote:
Hi
Sorry I dont remember what is the parameter which show up every parameters
stores in my solrconfig.xml file for the dismax query ? thanks a lot,
echoParams=all ?
regards,
Koji
yes thanks a lot Koji,
Koji Sekiguchi-2 wrote:
>
> sunnyfr wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Sorry I dont remember what is the parameter which show up every
>> parameters
>> stores in my solrconfig.xml file for the dismax query ? thanks a
>> lot,
>>
>>
>>
> echoParams=all ?
>
> regards,
>
> Koji
>
Seeing this in the logs of an otherwise working solr instance. Commits are
done automatically I believe every 10m or 1 docs. This is solr trunk
(last updated last night) Any ideas?
INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/select
params={fl=thingID,n_thingname,score&q=n_thingname:"Cornell+Dupree"^5+net_th
Hi Tolga,
Here's a good place to start:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryElevationComponent
Steve
On 2/23/2009 at 7:47 PM, Ercan, Tolga wrote:
> I was wondering if there was any facility to directly manipulate
search
> results based on business criteria to place documents at a fixed
> position
Hi fellow Solr fans,
I'm setting up some collection distribution along with multicore
solr . I'm using version 1.3
I have no problem with the snapshooter, since this can be set within
each core in solrconfig.xml.
My question is more about the rsyncd .
The rsyncd-start creates a rsyncd.co
I believe the difference is that an sint is mangled in such a way that it
will sort properly (i.e. during a range query) where as a regular integer is
not. Since everything is stored as a string in lucene, sorting by numbers
happens lexicographically which may not be the same as an ordinal sort. Th
Hey there,
Is there any dynamic way to specify the queries to do the warming? I mean,
not writing them hardcoded in solrconfig.xml but getting them from a
database or from another file??
Thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/warming-question-tp22187322p22187322
Most likely a jar issue. Did you clean before dist? The commons jar is
probably out of whack with the solr jar - or something in that realm of
thought.
I'd fresh build and deploy again.
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Brian Whitman wrote:
Seeing this in the logs of an otherwise
i hit that one too!
try: ant clean
On Feb 24, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Brian Whitman wrote:
Seeing this in the logs of an otherwise working solr instance.
Commits are
done automatically I believe every 10m or 1 docs. This is solr
trunk
(last updated last night) Any ideas?
INFO: [] webapp
Here you can see a manifestation of it when trying to highlight with ?q=daß
−
−
−
-Community" einfach nicht mehr wahrnimmt.
Hätte mir am letzten Montag Nachmittag jemand gesagt, daß
ich am Abend
−
recht, wenn er sagte, daß das wirklich wertvolle an
Drupal schlichtweg seine (Entwickler- und A
: > H good call, i didn't realize the escape method had been so
: > blanket in 1.3. this way we protect people who were using it in 1.3 and
: > relied on it to protect them from the legacy ";" behavior.
: Thanks hoss and ryan. That explains why the error was new to us-- we
: upgraded to
So - something in the highlighting code is counting bytes when it
should be counting characters. Looks like a lucene bug, so I'm
surprised others have not hit this before. Probably this is it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1500
-Peter
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Peter Wolan
Actually, looking at the Lucene source and the trace:
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: 2822
at java.lang.String.substring(String.java:1765)
at
org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.Highlighter.getBestTextFragments(Highlighter.java:274)
at
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Jonathan Haddad wrote:
> What are the differences between using an sint and an integer, aside
> from the range queries on sint? If I've indexed a field as an
> integer, and I try to sort on it, will there be performance problem?
Nope. If you don't need range que
Thanks for your answers Michael! I was using a pre-1.3 Solr build, but I've
now upgraded to the 1.3 release, run the new CheckIndex shipped as part of
the Lucene 2.4 dev build and I'm still getting the CorruptIndexException:
docs out of order exceptions I'm afraid.
Upon a fresh start, on newly Che
Yep, did ant clean, made sure all the solr-libs were current, no more
exception. Thanks ryan & mark
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> i hit that one too!
>
> try: ant clean
>
>
>
> On Feb 24, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Brian Whitman wrote:
>
> Seeing this in the logs of an other
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
>
> Hey there,
> Is there any dynamic way to specify the queries to do the warming? I mean,
> not writing them hardcoded in solrconfig.xml but getting them from a
> database or from another file??
>
Not right now. I had once wanted to do the
please do a ant clean dist
The signature of a method in ConsurrentLRUCache was altered
from
ConcurrentLRUCache.getLatestAccessedItems(long count) to
ConcurrentLRUCache.getLatestAccessedItems(int count)
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Brian Whitman wrote:
> Yep, did ant clean, made sure all the
I'm actually working on one for my company which parses our tomcat log files
to obtain queries to feed as warming queries (since GET queries are the
dominant source of queries) to the firstSearcher. I am not sure what the
interface is in Solr 1.3, but in 1.2, I implemented the SolrEventListener
int
Hi,
can we achieve wildcard search with q query parameter. wildcard search works
fine with q.alt parameter but not with q parameter.
Also, I am trying to debug the QueryParser class for the same issue, but the
control is not going in the right place in the eclipse. Hence, I am not able
to debug
Hi,
I am trying to debug code of QueryParser class and other related files. I
have also taken the code of lucene from its SVN, but it is not going to the
right control during debug.
I wnated to know if I have taken the latest code and if not, from where I
can take the code.
Thansk,
Amit Garg
--
34 matches
Mail list logo