[Rd] R-2.15.1 CMD CHECK output: "Call Sequence"

2012-10-20 Thread Mark Cowley
Hi guRus, i'm running R-2.15.1 and the R CMD CHECK output appears to have changed substantially, in that instead of pointing me to the offending functions or files, I get lots of 'call sequence' traces as below. I've been using R CMD CHECK for years & never seen anything like this before. This

Re: [Rd] R-2.15.1 CMD CHECK output: "Call Sequence"

2012-10-20 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012, Mark Cowley wrote: Hi guRus, i'm running R-2.15.1 and the R CMD CHECK output appears to have changed substantially, in that instead of pointing me to the Changed since when? This has been the behaviour for years with the error quoted. offending functions or files,

Re: [Rd] Rcmd_environ and R_LIBS_{USER,SITE}

2012-10-20 Thread Uwe Ligges
Dirk, if you are checking "foo", then "foo" is found in the examples (on all OSs), even if it is NOT installed at all! Can you make the sources available for me? Uwe On 19.10.2012 23:58, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: Hi Uwe, On 19 October 2012 at 19:25, Uwe Ligges wrote: | Dirk, | | if y

Re: [Rd] Rcmd_environ and R_LIBS_{USER,SITE}

2012-10-20 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Uwe, On 20 October 2012 at 16:57, Uwe Ligges wrote: | Dirk, | | if you are checking "foo", then "foo" is found in the examples (on all | OSs), even if it is NOT installed at all! Well the log you asked me to supply very clearly shows otherwise. All I doing is i) R itself in c:\opt\R-c

Re: [Rd] Change in the RNG implementation?

2012-10-20 Thread Martin Maechler
> Duncan Murdoch > on Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:26:39 -0400 writes: > On 12-10-19 7:04 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Looks like the implementation of random number generation changed in >> R-devel with respect to R-2.15.1. >> >> With R-2.15.1: >>