csiro.au> writes:
> There must be over 2000 people who have written CRAN packages by now; every
extra
> check and non-back-compatible additional requirement runs the risk of
generating false-negatives and
> incurring many extra person-hours to "fix" non-problems. Plus someone needs
to document
Paul,
> I have packages where I know CRAN and other test platforms do not have
> all the resources to build the vignettes, for example, access to
> databases.
For some of my vignettes that is true, too. For those, the vignette
directory contains the .pdf produced on my machine and a "fake" .Rnw,
Paul,
> One of the things I have noticed with the R 2.15.0 RC and --as-cran is
> that the I have to bump the version number of the working copy of my
[snip]
>
> I am curious how other developers approach this.
Regardless of --as-cran I find it very useful to use the date as minor
part of the v
(Renamed from "Re: [Rd] CRAN policies" because the of the
muli-threading of that subject.)
Claudia
Actually, my version numbers are year-month dates, eg 2012.3-1, although
I don't set them automatically.
I have had some additional off-line discussion on this. The problem is this:
Now when
It looks like you define a few functions that use substitute() or sys.call()
or similar functions to look at the unevaluated argument list. E.g.,
"cq" <-
function( ...) {
# Saves putting in quotes!
# E.G.: quoted( first, second, third) is the same as c( 'first', 'second',
'third')
# wr
I'll echo Mark's concerns. R _used_ to be a language for "turning ideas
into software quickly". Now it is more like "prototyping ideas in software
quickly", and then spend a substantial amount of time trying to follow
administrative rules to package the code. Quality has its costs.
Many of the
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Kevin Wright wrote:
> I'll echo Mark's concerns. R _used_ to be a language for "turning ideas
> into software quickly". Now it is more like "prototyping ideas in software
> quickly", and then spend a substantial amount of time trying to follow
> administrative r
I don't know what the RSiteSearch function does anymore, or who
maintains it. Please ignore this if you have nothing to do with it.
I recently moved my R site, finzi.psych.upenn.edu to a new
computer. Somehow some of the mailing-list search capabilities were
lost, and I do not have time to find th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Figured it out (I think: I haven't gotten through restructuring and
testing, but I think it's going to work now). I was paying
insufficient attention to the build arguments, in particular
- --resave-data=best.
I previously had the clever idea to
On 12-03-30 08:14 PM, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
> On my phone, so replying off-list, but wouldn't loading the data
> objects in a running R session and using the appropriate
> compression arguments to save() do the trick? - Brian
I might try that, but I have a strong suspicion that R will try to
10 matches
Mail list logo
