Re: [Rd] Use of R in C#

2011-05-23 Thread Erich Neuwirth
Please discuss statconnDCOM related problems on its dedicated mailing list. You can subscribe at rcom.univie.ac.at On 5/22/2011 2:31 PM, Andra wrote: > > Jeff Abrams microsoft.com> writes: > >> >> I have a C# program that requires the run of a logistic regression. I have > downloaded the R 2

Re: [Rd] Calling Rscript from Makevars

2011-05-23 Thread Martyn Byng
Hi, Thanks for the help. Putting the call to Rscript directly in the definition of PKG_LIBS rather than in a different makefile variable and using that variable when defining PKG_LIBS did indeed fix my problem. Martyn -Original Message- From: Simon Urbanek [mailto:simon.urba...@r-projec

Re: [Rd] Calling Rscript from Makevars

2011-05-23 Thread Sean Robert McGuffee
Hi Simon, I'm not sure what you mean by, "any tests you run in configure will ignore it since autoconf only uses LIBS and not PKG_LIBS." I though autoconf used any variable names you tell it to, so that it would use PKG_LIBS if you tell it to. Also, I'm still not clear as to what a Makevars file

Re: [Rd] Calling Rscript from Makevars

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Urbanek
On May 23, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Sean Robert McGuffee wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean by, "any tests you run in configure will ignore it > since autoconf only uses LIBS and not PKG_LIBS." I though autoconf used any > variable names you tell it to, so that it would use PKG_LIBS if you tell it

Re: [Rd] Calling Rscript from Makevars

2011-05-23 Thread Sean Robert McGuffee
On 5/23/11 1:30 PM, "Simon Urbanek" wrote: > > On May 23, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Sean Robert McGuffee wrote: > >> I'm not sure what you mean by, "any tests you run in configure will ignore it >> since autoconf only uses LIBS and not PKG_LIBS." I though autoconf used any >> variable names you tel

Re: [Rd] Calling Rscript from Makevars

2011-05-23 Thread Simon Urbanek
Sean, On May 23, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Sean Robert McGuffee wrote: > > On 5/23/11 1:30 PM, "Simon Urbanek" wrote: > >> >> On May 23, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Sean Robert McGuffee wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure what you mean by, "any tests you run in configure will ignore >>> it >>> since autoconf only us