Re: [Rd] R-bugs e-mail problems {was "sapply(Date, is.numeric)"}

2008-07-30 Thread Martin Maechler
> "RobMcG" == McGehee, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:40:37 -0400 writes: RobMcG> FYI, RobMcG> I've tried posting the below message twice to the bug tracking system, RobMcG> once by email (below), and the second time 5 days later directly to the

Re: [Rd] sapply(Date, is.numeric)

2008-07-30 Thread Martin Maechler
> "RobMcG" == McGehee, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:40:37 -0400 writes: RobMcG> FYI, RobMcG> I've tried posting the below message twice to the bug tracking system, [... r-bugs problems discussed in a separate thread ] RobMcG> R-devel

Re: [Rd] sapply(Date, is.numeric)

2008-07-30 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Try this workaround sapply(x, function(x) is.numeric(x)) dt FALSE is.numeric is primitive, and primitive functions don't always play well with [sl]apply. On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, McGehee, Robert wrote: FYI, I've tried posting the below message twice to the bug tracking system, once by emai

Re: [Rd] sapply(Date, is.numeric)

2008-07-30 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Martin Maechler wrote: "RobMcG" == McGehee, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:40:37 -0400 writes: RobMcG> FYI, RobMcG> I've tried posting the below message twice to the bug tracking system, [... r-bugs problems discussed in a separate thr

Re: [Rd] sapply(Date, is.numeric)

2008-07-30 Thread Martin Maechler
> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:29:38 +0100 (BST) writes: BDR> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Martin Maechler wrote: >>> "RobMcG" == McGehee, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> on Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:40:37 -0400 writes: >> RobMcG

Re: [Rd] closing View windows after multiple View(x) crashes

2008-07-30 Thread Ben Bolker
I'm using Gnome. Ben Prof Brian Ripley wrote: We have found elsewhere that the need to use XSync is very dependent on the window manager. What manager were you using? I'll add the call in any case. On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Bill Dunlap wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Ben Bolker wrote: That

[Rd] R, Macports and C++ streams

2008-07-30 Thread Ernest Turro
Dear all, R on Macports relies on GCC 4.3 to build packages. I find that packages with shared objects that use C++ streams crash R if they're compiled using Macports' gcc43, but work fine if compiled in exactly the same way using Apple-supplied GCC 4.2. Has anyone here had the same issue/

Re: [Rd] R, Macports and C++ streams

2008-07-30 Thread Kjell Konis
I found this in Writing R Extensions: "Using C++ iostreams, as in this example, is best avoided. There is no guarantee that the output will appear in the R console, and indeed it will not on the R for Windows console. Use R code or the C entry points (see Printing) for all I/O if at all pos

Re: [Rd] R, Macports and C++ streams

2008-07-30 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:45 , Ernest Turro wrote: Dear all, R on Macports relies on GCC 4.3 to build packages. I find that packages with shared objects that use C++ streams crash R if they're compiled using Macports' gcc43, but work fine if compiled in exactly the same way using Apple-suppl

Re: [Rd] R, Macports and C++ streams

2008-07-30 Thread Ernest Turro
On 30 Jul 2008, at 15:46, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:45 , Ernest Turro wrote: Dear all, R on Macports relies on GCC 4.3 to build packages. I find that packages with shared objects that use C++ streams crash R if they're compiled using Macports' gcc43, but work fine if co

Re: [Rd] R, Macports and C++ streams

2008-07-30 Thread Ernest Turro
On 30 Jul 2008, at 15:18, Kjell Konis wrote: I found this in Writing R Extensions: "Using C++ iostreams, as in this example, is best avoided. There is no guarantee that the output will appear in the R console, and indeed it will not on the R for Windows console. Use R code or the C entry

Re: [Rd] R, Macports and C++ streams

2008-07-30 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Jul 30, 2008, at 12:35 , Ernest Turro wrote: On 30 Jul 2008, at 15:18, Kjell Konis wrote: I found this in Writing R Extensions: "Using C++ iostreams, as in this example, is best avoided. There is no guarantee that the output will appear in the R console, and indeed it will not on the

Re: [Rd] R, Macports and C++ streams

2008-07-30 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Jul 30, 2008, at 12:32 , Ernest Turro wrote: On 30 Jul 2008, at 15:46, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:45 , Ernest Turro wrote: Dear all, R on Macports relies on GCC 4.3 to build packages. I find that packages with shared objects that use C++ streams crash R if they're

Re: [Rd] R, Macports and C++ streams

2008-07-30 Thread Ernest Turro
On 30 Jul 2008, at 18:04, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 12:32 , Ernest Turro wrote: On 30 Jul 2008, at 15:46, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:45 , Ernest Turro wrote: Dear all, R on Macports relies on GCC 4.3 to build packages. I find that packages with shared

Re: [Rd] R, Macports and C++ streams

2008-07-30 Thread Ernest Turro
On 30 Jul 2008, at 17:58, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 12:35 , Ernest Turro wrote: On 30 Jul 2008, at 15:18, Kjell Konis wrote: I found this in Writing R Extensions: "Using C++ iostreams, as in this example, is best avoided. There is no guarantee that the output will appear

Re: [Rd] R, Macports and C++ streams

2008-07-30 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Jul 30, 2008, at 13:16 , Ernest Turro wrote: On 30 Jul 2008, at 18:04, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 12:32 , Ernest Turro wrote: On 30 Jul 2008, at 15:46, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:45 , Ernest Turro wrote: Dear all, R on Macports relies on GCC 4.3 to

Re: [Rd] R, Macports and C++ streams

2008-07-30 Thread Ernest Turro
On 30 Jul 2008, at 19:23, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 13:16 , Ernest Turro wrote: On 30 Jul 2008, at 18:04, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 12:32 , Ernest Turro wrote: On 30 Jul 2008, at 15:46, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:45 , Ernest Turro wrote

Re: [Rd] R, Macports and C++ streams

2008-07-30 Thread Ernest Turro
On 30 Jul 2008, at 20:25, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 15:13 , Ernest Turro wrote: On 30 Jul 2008, at 19:23, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 13:16 , Ernest Turro wrote: On 30 Jul 2008, at 18:04, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 12:32 , Ernest Turro wrot

Re: [Rd] R, Macports and C++ streams

2008-07-30 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Jul 30, 2008, at 15:13 , Ernest Turro wrote: On 30 Jul 2008, at 19:23, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 13:16 , Ernest Turro wrote: On 30 Jul 2008, at 18:04, Simon Urbanek wrote: On Jul 30, 2008, at 12:32 , Ernest Turro wrote: On 30 Jul 2008, at 15:46, Simon Urbanek wrot

[Rd] Name clashes among packages

2008-07-30 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
To handle name clashes among packages I wonder if we could have a namespace setting between exported and not-exported which is exported but you have to use :: (two dots) to access its objects. The difference between mandatory two dot and three dots in this case is that the exported objects are int