PEP 255 ("Simple Generators") closes with:
> Q. Then why not allow an expression on "return" too?
>
> A. Perhaps we will someday. In Icon, "return expr" means both "I'm
>done", and "but I have one final useful value to return too, and
>this is it". At the start, and in the absence of com
PEP 255 ("Simple Generators") closes with:
> Q. Then why not allow an expression on "return" too?
>
> A. Perhaps we will someday. In Icon, "return expr" means both "I'm
>done", and "but I have one final useful value to return too, and
>this is it". At the start, and in the absence of com
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
[...]
>
>> Last, but far from least, as far as I can tell you can implement all of
>> these semantics using PEP 342 as it sits. That is, it's very simple to
>> make decorators or classes that add those semantics. I don't see
