On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 00:48, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> I propose to solve the hash collision vulnerability by counting
> collisions because it does fix the vulnerability with a minor or no
> impact on applications or backward compatibility. I don't see why we
> should use a different fix for Pytho
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 03:48, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I think that's because your collision-counting algorithm was much more
> primitive than MAL's.
Conceded.
>> This,
>> combined with the second problem (needing to catch an exception), led
>> me to abandon this approach and write Securetypes
