- Original Message -
> While much of the opposition to dropping Python <2.7 stems from the RHEL
> community (they still have 2.4 in extended support and 2.7 wasn't in a
> release until a few weeks ago), a common objection from the users is "I
> can't install a different Python" or "it's too
Hi,
as Fedora is getting closer to having python3 as a default, I'm being more and
more asked by Fedora users/contributors what'll "/usr/bin/python" invoke when
we achieve this (Fedora 22 hopefully). So I was rereading PEP 394 and I think I
need a small clarification regarding two points in the
- Original Message -
> On 19 Sep 2014 17:38, "Bohuslav Kabrda" < bkab...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > - "Similarly, the more general python command should be installed whenever
> > any version of Python is installed and should invoke the same version of
>
- Original Message -
> On 20 September 2014 00:23, Donald Stufft wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >
> > If the user wants to invoke Python 3, it's not hard to type 'python3' and I
> > think that's the message we should be spreading. That already seems pr
- Original Message -
> On 30 September 2014 20:13, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 20 September 2014 00:23, Donald Stufft wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >> >
- Original Message -
> Hi Everyone,
> I am a core software engineer at Rocket Software Inc. I am working on
> database system called UniData and Universe.
> Now we plan to introduce Python as the new programming language to our
> customer. When I try to build the python 3.4.1 on Red Hat
- Original Message -
> Blaxton writes:
>
> > I am using the spec file that comes with Python source code which
> > downloaded from python.org website
>
> Ah, sorry, I didn't realize that. My advice still stands; while there
> are Red Hat/Fedora/other-RPM-based distro workers here, I do
Hi,
I'd like to ask about the purpose of files in $(DESTDIR)$(LIBPL) [1] - what is
the reason to keep them/what are they useful for?
I'm currently "taking over" Python packaging in Fedora and I'd like to know if
these have some meaning for a distro-packaged Python (Dave Malcolm is not sure
about
Hi all,
in recent days, there has been a discussion on fedora-devel (see thread [1])
about moving to Python 3 as a default.
I'd really love to hear opinions on the matter from the upstream, mainly
regarding these two points (that are not that clearly defined in my original
proposal and have been
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > - Should we point /usr/bin/python to Python 3 when we make the move?
>
> No.
>
> > - What should user get after using "yum install python"?
>
> Will a base insta
- Original Message -
> Am 24.07.13 11:12, schrieb Bohuslav Kabrda:
> > - Should we point /usr/bin/python to Python 3 when we make the move?
>
> This should depend on the answer to this question:
> - for how long have you been providing /usr/bin/python2 binaries?
>
Hi, I'm trying to build Python 3.2.3 against system expat library, that lies
out of the ordinary directory structure (under /opt). I also have an older
version of expat library in the system. No matter what shell variables or
options I pass to configure and make, pyexpat gets linked against the
Hi, I'm trying to build Python 3.2.3 against system expat library, that lies
out of the ordinary directory structure (under /opt). I also have an older
version of expat library in the system. No matter what shell variables or
options I pass to configure and make, pyexpat gets linked against the
- Original Message -
> On 25.04.2012 15:42, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > Hi, I'm trying to build Python 3.2.3 against system expat library,
> > that lies
> > out of the ordinary directory structure (under /opt). I also have
> > an older
> > version of
14 matches
Mail list logo