On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:08 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> > I am not an expert, I am just another python learner. These are just my
> > views on the state of the standard libraries and to
> > make them state-of-the-art..! ;)
>
> If I understand correctly, you want the (current) standard library
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:36:10 pm Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
>
> > It could be something as simple as a "require" keyword which could
> > pull in the depdencies if not found. Perhaps at the top of
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:21 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Steven Bethard
> wrote:
> >
> > If you're only concerned about 2.X, then yes, optparse will *never* be
> > removed from 2.X. There will be a deprecation note in the 2.X
> > documentation but deprecation
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For 2.7/3.2, I am in the process of removing modules in Distutils that
> can be replaced by calls to existing functions in stdlib. For
> instance, "dir_util" and "file_util" (old modules from the Python 1.x
> era) are going away in
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote:
> 2010/1/16 Jack Diederich :
> > Good lord, did this make it past other people's spam filters too? I
> > especially liked the reference to "REGION -2,0 ; Rlyeh". Ph'nglui
> > mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn to you too sir.
>
> Ya ma
Hi,
I am surprised to see that the bug-tracker
doesn't have an OS classifier or ability to add
tags ? Since a number of issues reported seem to
be OS specific (one can find a lot of Windows only
issues upon a search), won't adding these fields
help bug triaging ?
I am not sure which so
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 07:06:29PM +0530, Anand Balachandran Pillai
> wrote:
> >>I am surprised to see that the bug-tracker
> >> doesn't have an OS classifier or
