On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 16:07, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Several of the PSF blogs hosted on Google's Blogger platform are experiencing
> issues as fallout from the recent maintenance problems they had. We have
> already had to recreate at least one of the translations for Python Insider
> in order
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 16:07, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> Several of the PSF blogs hosted on Google's Blogger platform are
>> experiencing issues as fallout from the recent maintenance problems they
>> had. We have already had to recreate at
There's a thread on python-list at the moment:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2011-May/1272505.html
which is discussing the validity of os.access results on
Windows. Now we've been here before: I raised issue2528
for a previous enquiry some years ago and proffered a patch
which us
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> This behavior matches what I was imagining for having
> b'a' == 97. They compare equal, yet remain distinct objects
> for all other purposes.
>
> If anybody has a link to or an explanation why equal values must be equal
> hashes I'm all ears
>> With respect to Google Blogger, I don't see a good reason to use it as
>> the platform for the blog.
>
> As with any infrastructure, there is a reasonably high cost in
> changing, as people have become used to a certain way of doing things,
> and porting the contents from the old system to the n
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>>> With respect to Google Blogger, I don't see a good reason to use it as
>>> the platform for the blog.
>>
>> As with any infrastructure, there is a reasonably high cost in
>> changing, as people have become used to a certain way of doing thi
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 03:38, Tim Golden wrote:
> There's a thread on python-list at the moment:
>
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2011-May/1272505.html
>
> which is discussing the validity of os.access results on
> Windows. Now we've been here before: I raised issue2528
> for a p
On 20/05/2011 16:21, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 03:38, Tim Golden
(Sorry about that; I had no idea I'd sent that from my work account)
I think we should tread lightly in the documentation area. We already
have two note boxes, and adding a third probably scares everyone away.
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> On 19.05.2011 13:35, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> Hey
>>
>> I've pushed packaging in stdlib. There are a few buildbots errors
>> we're fixing right now.
>>
>> We will continue our work in their directly for now on.
>
> Rock on!
Thanks :)
Still work
> There is ongoing work for an RFP by the board to improve the
> python.org publishing system/site to allow us to self-host these
> things. Moving PSF properties off of it, and onto another "hosted by
> someone else" site is probably not a good idea, but our hands may be
> forced if google/blogger
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> Has the Python insider blog really accumulated enough history and
> cruft to make this move problematic? It's a fairly new blog, with not
> much content in it. From my blogging experience, Blogger has other
> limitations which eventually bite
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>> There is ongoing work for an RFP by the board to improve the
>> python.org publishing system/site to allow us to self-host these
>> things. Moving PSF properties off of it, and onto another "hosted by
>> someone else" site is probably not a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/20/2011 11:35 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>> There is ongoing work for an RFP by the board to improve the
>> python.org publishing system/site to allow us to self-host these
>> things. Moving PSF properties off of it, and onto another "hosted by
>>
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-05-13 - 2011-05-20)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open2794 (+10)
closed 21115 (+46)
total 23909 (+56)
Open issues wit
On May 20, 2011 8:30 AM, "Tim Golden" wrote:
> On 20/05/2011 16:21, Brian Curtin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 03:38, Tim Golden (Sorry about that; I had no idea I'd sent that from my work account)
>
>> I think we should tread lightly in the documentation area. We already
>> have two note b
Hi,
My name is Charles-François Natali, I've been using Python for a
couple years, and I've recently been granted commit priviledge.
I just wanted to say hi to everyone on this list, and let you know
that I'm really happy and proud of joining this great community.
Cheers,
cf
Hi,
since May 19, I get the exception below in the latest py3k site.py when
trying to run a distutils build with it (building Cython). The changelog
since the previous (working) CPython build is here:
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/job/py3k-hg/374/
The failing build is here:
h
On 20.05.2011 17:35, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>> There is ongoing work for an RFP by the board to improve the
>> python.org publishing system/site to allow us to self-host these
>> things. Moving PSF properties off of it, and onto another "hosted by
>> someone else" site is probably not a good idea, bu
> As Jesse has said, there is an RFP in development to improve
> python.org to the point where we can self-host blogs and the like and
> deal with the associated user account administration appropriately.
To run a blog on www.python.org, a PEP is not needed. If anybody would
volunteer to set this
> TBH I think the less attractive we can make os.access() look the
> better. It uses the real uid instead of the effective uid, it
> encourages LBYL behavior, the outcome may be incorrect, it doesn't
> work on Windows... The ONLY reason to ever use it is in a setuid()
> program. But who writes thos
On May 20, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> As Jesse has said, there is an RFP in development to improve
>> python.org to the point where we can self-host blogs and the like and
>> deal with the associated user account administration appropriately.
>
> To run a blog on www.python.org,
Hello to all you Pythoneers and Pythonistas,
I'm happy to announce the availability of Python 2.6.7 release candidate 2.
Release candidate 1 was not widely announced due to a mismatch between the
Mercurial and Subversion branches. Barring any unforeseen issues, this will
be the last release candi
In article ,
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> since May 19, I get the exception below in the latest py3k site.py when
> trying to run a distutils build with it (building Cython). The changelog
> since the previous (working) CPython build is here:
>
> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/job/py3k
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 19:01 +0200, Charles-François Natali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My name is Charles-François Natali, I've been using Python for a
> couple years, and I've recently been granted commit priviledge.
> I just wanted to say hi to everyone on this list, and let you know
> that I'm really happ
24 matches
Mail list logo
