actual time=49.920..49.922 rows=17 loops=1)
> Buffers: shared hit=6388
> LOCATION: explain_ExecutorEnd, auto_explain.c:359
> QUERY PLAN
>
> ---
-
Function Scan on generic_query_python foo (cost=0.25..50.25 rows=5000
width=40) (actual time=49.920..49.922 rows=17 loops=1)
Planning time: 0.029 ms
Execution time: 49.977 ms
(3 rows)
Michael Krüger schrieb am F
Dear all,
I need to find out the Oid of a custom type in C programming language. This
type is defined in a schema, outside of the standard search path, e.g. public.
I know that I can call TypenameGetTypid to find out an Oid. But this is not
working for me if the type is not in the public namespa
Hi,
> Am 03.12.2020 um 11:01 schrieb Pavel Stehule :
>
> Hi
>
> čt 3. 12. 2020 v 10:32 odesílatel Michael Krüger
> napsal:
> Dear all,
>
> I need to find out the Oid of a custom type in C programming language. This
> type is defined in a schema, outside of
Dear community,
I'm using PG10.1 on CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) after upgrading it
from PG9.6.6. My application heavily uses sequences and requires different
increments of sequence numbers, e.g. a range of 100, 1000 or 5000 numbers,
so it is not possible to set a fixed increment on a sequ
h the performance impact
but more safety if needed.
I will try if Adrians proposal does the trick for my application. Sounds
promising, thanks.
Regards,
Michael
Adrian Klaver schrieb am Mo., 22. Jan. 2018 um
22:29 Uhr:
> On 01/22/2018 07:24 AM, Michael Krüger wrote:
> > Dear community,
>
new release of Postgres
caused some severe headaches among our customers.
If you all agree that this changed function should be equivalent to the
original one, then its at least an easy fix.
Thank you all for your fast responses.
Regards,
Michael
Michael Krüger schrieb am Mo., 22. Jan. 2018 um
23:11
Hello all,
I think a good alternative was found and seems to be working fine. I really
do appreciate all the help and feedback.
Many thanks.
Regards,
Michael
Adrian Klaver schrieb am Di., 23. Jan. 2018 um
02:12 Uhr:
> On 01/22/2018 02:47 PM, Michael Krüger wrote:
> > Hello all,
>
Dear community,
I need a bit of advice on parallel query execution.
I have a table with roughly 2 million rows in it. These rows are
distributed over a set of IDs. Therefore I can group my rows based on the
ID set.
If I query the table directly like this:
select mediatrunkid,count(*)::numeric fr
Dear all,
still same behavior with Postgres 10.2 ...
Just as a reminder that the issue still exists.
Regards,
Michael
Andreas Kretschmer schrieb am Di., 6. Feb. 2018
um 08:35 Uhr:
> Hi,
>
>
> Am 06.02.2018 um 08:24 schrieb Michael Krüger:
> > create or replace function rep
10 matches
Mail list logo