Re: [opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy: commencement date

2010-03-21 Thread Harleen Gretzky
They way I read it both these "violations" are specific to LL and their service if you quote them entirely; "You assume all risks, expenses, and defects of any Third-Party Viewers that you use, develop, or distribute. Linden Lab shall not be responsible or liable for any Third-Party Viewers." "You

Re: [opensource-dev] A note on preserving "NO WARRANTY" for SL TPV developers

2010-03-30 Thread Harleen Gretzky
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Robert Martin wrote: > > Under the 3PV policy Kirsten would be banned for writing a "copybot" > viewer that she/he did not actually write. This is the core of what is > wrong with the policy as written. > > Kristen's source code and binaries are published, LL woul

Re: [opensource-dev] A note on preserving "NO WARRANTY" for SL TPV developers

2010-03-30 Thread Harleen Gretzky
I read a different TPV policy than you did, I do not see where this is true. On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Lance Corrimal wrote: > Am Dienstag 30 März 2010 schrieb Harleen Gretzky: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Robert Martin > wrote: > > > Under the 3PV policy Ki

Re: [opensource-dev] being forced to upgrade to "2.1 Alpha" release

2010-06-14 Thread Harleen Gretzky
More likely only to those still using the last Beta release. On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Opensource Obscure wrote: > > Some users report they were forced to download the > 2.0.2, "2.1 Alpha" release. > > Is it correct to assume this only happens to those > who had installed a previous Beta r