[opensource-dev] Fw: Upcoming server side avatar baking

2012-12-20 Thread Nicky Perian
I decided to put some walk with my rather cheap talk. Here is a repackaged server side avatar baking repository. https://bitbucket.org/NickyP/viewer-development-sunshine-diff/overview It is 2 changesets atop the last point in viewer-development used in sunshine-external. Those 2 can be reduced to

Re: [opensource-dev] Fw: Upcoming server side avatar baking

2012-12-20 Thread Henri Beauchamp
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:03:03 -0800 (PST), Nicky Perian wrote: > I decided to put some walk with my rather cheap talk. > Here is a repackaged server side avatar baking repository. > https://bitbucket.org/NickyP/viewer-development-sunshine-diff/overview I'm afraid it didn't work... The diff I get w

Re: [opensource-dev] Fw: Upcoming server side avatar baking

2012-12-20 Thread Ambrosia
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:03:03 -0800 (PST), Nicky Perian wrote: > >> I decided to put some walk with my rather cheap talk. >> Here is a repackaged server side avatar baking repository. >> https://bitbucket.org/NickyP/viewer-development-sunsh

Re: [opensource-dev] Fw: Upcoming server side avatar baking

2012-12-20 Thread Ambrosia
A little update, the diff produced through this method sadly does not hold the sunshine changes, but the code that's not in sunshine yet. I thought mercurial would be so smart as to recognize the current repo as the parent which to treat as the thing to diff against, but it seems the steps I used

Re: [opensource-dev] Fw: Upcoming server side avatar baking

2012-12-20 Thread Nicky Perian
The  difference in the re-base method of 1.9+ vs 2.2 most likely due to not having merge changsets in play. I think a rebase and not folding the changesets might be better. Then, if there are ui and pathfinding changesets not needed in v1 they could be stripped leaving only server bake changsets