Is there any particular reason why I still cannot file a CR against viewer-
development, even though the latest version of "the official policy" as posted
by Oz on this list roughly a week ago or two said that patches should be based
on viewer-development?
Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2012, 11:16:2
Several months back the policy concerning viewer-beta and viewer-release
changed with those repositories being subject to changed history. I think this
was to allow LL to develop features in private and then push them directly to
viewer-release and then reset viewer-beta and viewer-development t
Several months back the policy concerning viewer-beta and viewer-*development
development not release.
>
> From: Nicky Perian
>To: Lance Corrimal ;
>"opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com"
>Sent: Monday, September 3, 2012 6:16 AM
>Subject: Re: [opensource-dev]
even more so, seeing that Oz himself said that all patches / fixes /
contributions are supposed to be based on viewer-development:
https://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/opensource-dev/2012-August/009178.html
so please, fix codereview so that people who WANT to contribute fixes CAN
contribute fi
