[Numpy-discussion] Re: status of long double support and what to do about it

On 11/17/22 7:13 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 3:15 PM Ralf Gommers > wrote: Hi all, We have to do something about long double support. This is something I wanted to propose a long time ago already, and moving build systems

[Numpy-discussion] Re: status of long double support and what to do about it

On 11/17/22 8:53 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 6:30 PM Scott Ransom mailto:sran...@nrao.edu>> wrote: On 11/17/22 7:13 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 3:15 PM Ralf Gommers mailto:ralf.go

[Numpy-discussion] Re: status of long double support and what to do about it

Hi Mike, Good to hear from you! On 11/17/22 10:36 PM, Mike McCarty wrote: Hi Scott - Thanks for providing input! Do you have a minimal example that shows the type of calculations you would like to be faster with extended precision? Just so we are clear on the goal for this use case. The majo

[Numpy-discussion] Re: status of long double support and what to do about it

On 12/14/22 3:01 PM, Carl Kleffner wrote: Hi Scott, may I ask you which kind of vector / matrix operation in extended precision (np.longdouble) is supported in 'pint' ? It can't be backed by the underlying blas library as extended precision functions are not supported there. Carl Hi Carl,