Relevant post thanks for sharing. https://ironmongerysolutions.co.uk/
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussio
Hi All,
The documentation of Numpy's submodules used to have a fairly standard
structure as shown here in the 1.16 documentation:
https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.16.1/reference/routines.random.html
Now the same page in the API documentation looks like this:
https://numpy.org/doc/stable/
Hi Paul,
Do you think having a page with the flat list of routines back, in addition
to the explanations, would solve this?
- Melissa
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:34 PM Paul M. wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The documentation of Numpy's submodules used to have a fairly standard
> structure as shown here i
I second that reinstating such a list would be extremely useful. My issue
has been with the polynomial package, but the end result is the same.
- Joe
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021, 12:45 Melissa Mendonça wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Do you think having a page with the flat list of routines back, in
> addition
Hi Melissa,
I think that's the right approach. Looking through the current docs, I
think the page on the FFT module is exemplary in this regard:
https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/routines.fft.html
It lists all the available functions (with links to details), and then has
a section on "Back
I think the issue in random specifically is that a raw list of
available functions does not provide suitable guidance for someone looking
for random variate generating function. This is because the module-level
API is mostly dominated by methods of the singleton RandomState instance.
Best practice
Hi Kevin,
I'm all for wanting the docs to guide folks to current best practice, but
in its current form the documentation for this module is quite opaque.
Maybe a table like the old version that maps old functionality to exemplar
versions using Generator instances would be a useful compromise?
C
On Thursday, October 14, 2021, Joseph Fox-Rabinovitz <
jfoxrabinov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I second that reinstating such a list would be extremely useful. My issue
> has been with the polynomial package, but the end result is the same.
>
There's a mostly relevant issue: https://github.com/numpy/n
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:19 PM Kevin Sheppard
wrote:
> I think the issue in random specifically is that a raw list of
> available functions does not provide suitable guidance for someone looking
> for random variate generating function. This is because the module-level
> API is mostly dominated
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:36 AM Paul M. wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The documentation of Numpy's submodules used to have a fairly standard
> structure as shown here in the 1.16 documentation:
>
> https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.16.1/reference/routines.random.html
>
> Now the same page in the API
10 matches
Mail list logo
