Ok, this seems like a really simple one :) How do I get mailman to
start at boot time?
/home/mailman/bin/mailmanctl -s start
in rc.local ? Don't see it as a service anywhere and the documentation
doesn't seem to address this issue.
Cheer
t domain should be
specified?
Thanks in advance,
Richard.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives:
PLEASE!! list the current version number on the main page somewhere.
Also, please post the change log somewhere obvious on the web site.
These two quite small things would save many of us hours of work and
many megabytes of downloads.
--
Mai
s fine, but the
admin address mail seems to be lost. I guess it should be delivered to
myself just as the testlist-owner does.
Could someone clarify this for me?
Thanks,
Richard
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.pyt
e
address(es). Is this correct?
Thanks very much for your help.
Richard
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:37:48 -0700, you wrote:
>
> The list admin is the email address that is entered under General Options, the
> second selection:
>
> "The list administrator email addresses. Multiple
st be right, mail to listname-admin just disappears. I
think I'll just alias it to listname-owner. It appears that will do no
harm.
Thanks to you Paul and Lloyd who replied to my first question. I like
mailman a lot! It's great having this very active list.
Regards,
Richard
-
Hi Folks -
I want to create lists of accepted non-
members, rejected nonmembers, etc. Can
comments be inserted be or below the list?
Something like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
### ceo is spam - 2004.
Show us what that might look like?
Thanks,
Richard
the syntax be inside the nonmembers list?
Thanks for any help.
Richard
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable
Can anyone suggest anything?
We are running mailman with exim and cygwin on windows sever 2003.
Problem: all messages are truncated to about 45 Kb, be it body or attachment.
In the administrative interface / general options for the list I have changed
the field:
Maximum length in kilobytes (KB)
hem into the tree and expec them to work? (I really
don't look forward to merging archive trees!)
Any and all advice GREATFULLY RECEIVED! And, please be gentle if I've made
some major gaff - at least I have good backups! -smile-
With kind regards,
Richard
--
Richard Troy, Fo
ther kinds of
problems. I'm also not anxious to the risk of opening up an nfs disk to
such a system, but could that even work?
Any thoughts, please? If you think splitting things up is unrealistic,
please say so! Otherwise, I might be dumb (desperate) enough to try it and
I've lost a
eb server but JUST whereever
that URL points to now be served by the external lable that's the first
argument to ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse?
If I understand correctly, GEEZ THAT'S COOL, and _completely_ solves my
dilema! Please Confirm I got it!
THANK YOU,
Richard
On Wed, Se
HOWEVER, I _can_ access the server.
Can I just ignore this, or... ...is it actually important for some reason?
Thanks,
Richard
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FA
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Richard wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Fil wrote:
I would suggest that, on the Web server, you just proxy /mailman/ to your
Mailman's web service.
If you're using apache, something like this on the Web front-end will do:
ProxyPass /mailman http://ml.example.c
Hi Folks,
I have a moderator who's a bit hard to communicate with. She's new to the
moderation game. I can't make her an administrator because it would be too
risky - she'd likely screw it up because she has no idea what she's doing
yet. And, I'm behind a firewall and she's on the outside, a
t log in to the
administrator interface?
Thanks...
RT
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Richard wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have a moderator who's a bit hard to communicate with. She's new to the
moderation game. I can't make her an administrator because it would be too
risky - she'd likely
14-12, and I'm pretty sure it's the youngest version
that will run on that particular box.
Thanks,
Richard
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ:
web interface! YAY!
Just curious: This seems an obvious "enhancement" to younger versions - is
it safe to assume this script is now a part of the standard distribution?
(Or should I be mindful to save this script whenever I finally upgrade?)
Regards,
Richard
-
etting this value. Note that it's NOT a virtual
name! BOTH email and web server are accessable using the same domain name.
Thanks for any help.
Richard
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/lis
Hello Everyone,
I have more than once wished I could send out password reminder emails to
either individuals or an entire list. However, I haven't found a way to do
that yet. How can I do this, please?
Thanks,
Richard
--
Mailman-
it to use. I have not found a standard administrator way of
setting this value. Note that it's NOT a virtual name! BOTH email and web
server are accessable using the same domain name.
Thanks for any help.
Richard
--
Mailman-U
It seems mailmain is victim of its own popularity!
I have subscribed recently to a mailman mailing list
(http://stp.ling.uu.se/mailman/listinfo/dcml), posted a few messages there
with a totally new email address, and quickly started receiveing spam. I have
two friends with the same experience.
I
Hi,
I'm on a mailing list that recently switched the mailman DMARC setting
to "Munge from". IMO, the munging of the From: line is fine as far as
I'm concerned and I see how that fixes the DMARC problem.
However, what is really annoying is that it takes the original From:
line and puts it on the
Hello All,
this has been a problem since forever, but for the, oh, 12 to 15 years
I've been using mailman, heretofore I've had list members who were
competent enough to tell them, "where you see this system name, replace it
with this other one and it works fine." Now, that's not the case with
Some clarification below:
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Richard wrote:
Hello All,
this has been a problem since forever, but for the, oh, 12 to 15 years I've
been using mailman, heretofore I've had list members who were competent
enough to tell them, "where you see this system name,
On Sun, 4 Jun 2023, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 02:01:35 +0900
From: Stephen J. Turnbull
If that doesn't reveal the reason, also check your MTA logs and
configuration. MTAs are usually configured to reject or discard huge
messages (I think Postfix defaults to 50MB), a
eep great records about it back when
since it was just a part of my Fedora package system!
So, any pointers for this long-in-the-tooth Fedora Sys Admin?
Thanks folks,
Richard
(from somewhere in San Franciso's east bay area...)
--
Mailma
hat I have
absolutely NO use for (other than mailman).
Thanks,
Richard
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023, rich...@karmannghia.org wrote:
Hi All,
I used to use plain-ole mailman, WAY back in the '90s, BEFORE mailman2 and
LONG before mailman3... And I sure wish mailman2 had been done by people who
earching through the old
mail.)
Richard
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http:/
I'm trying to install 2.1.39 now, but am having an issue with verifying
the tarball.
I downloaded from: https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/mailman/
...these files:
mailman-2.1.39.tgz
mailman-2.1.39.tgz.sig
When I execute the appropriate command:
$ gpg --verify mailman-2.1.39.tgz.sig mailman-2.1.39.
NEVERMIND! I figured it out:
In this instance, it's:
gpg --recv-keys C638CAEF0AC21563736B5A22555B975E953B8693
Sorry to bother anybody! ;-)
Richard
---
I'm trying to install 2.1.39 now, but am having an issue with verifying the
tarball.
I downloaded from: https://ftp.g
Inching forward here folks, trying to get Mailman 2.1.39 going.
I get to the point it calls Python and it dies with:
checking for python... /usr/local/bin/python
checking Python interpreter... configure: error:
* No Python interpreter found!
* Try including the configure option
*
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote:
Python 2 and Python 3 are enough different to effectively be
different languages.
BTW, there is a python2 to 3 converter,
There's also this project:
https://github.com/jaredmauch/mailman2-python3/
-Jim P.
Now that Jared Mau
I have a list that won't send out mail. I believe that all the settings are
correct, but I could have missed something.
I am running Mailman 2.1.39 cPanel, and I have access to the command line.
I have a list that I needed to modify settings. It was established by a prior
administrator, to
...snip...
So is it the case that the message you received contained the actual messages
and they were only scrubbed in the archive and not in the message delivered
to List #2 members?
If so, that is a limitation of the archiver.
Um...
OK, it's not a confirmed archiver issue but... I se
#x27;re talking web interface details,
right?
Thanks,
Richard
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.
SADLY mistaken.
And therefore any discussion of "ensur[ing] a safe environment for email
discussions" is a real head-scratcher for me!
Chalk this one up as yet another entry in the long list of our collective
needs shot down by the "this is why we can't have nice things" e
issed that entirely! -eye-roll-
Richard
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/
Mailman FAQ: http://wik
things I might not mind sending in that way.
I have a good handful of friends who I have managed to convince to move to
Proton Mail because I just won't deal with them via email if they remain
on gmail, etc.
Richard
--
Mailman-Use
fer to help still stands; I can be an awesome ally but I shouldn't be
the one trying to drive this as I'm spread too thin already!
Either way, this has taken up enough of the mailman list's time! So, if
anyone cares to be engaged in this, email me privately and maybe we can
wor
ia DNS or DNS-like system is not
necessary.
As for users wanting to grep emails, that's a lame excuse: Just leave the
email unencrypted in your local folder! That one's born of lazyness not
capability. However, using encryption today CAN BE an annoying thing. My
goal is to remove the tim
of the variants.
A VERY straight-forward strategy would be to diff the current inbound against
the previous one it was in reply to - using threading as already cited. No LLM
is needed, well trained or otherwise, and neither is it "quite complex."
It'
is a whole 'nother issue!
Perhaps that helps someone attack this problem?
Rgds,
Richard
--
Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/
uot; when there are easy fixes to member complaints. Such is life.
I was kind of hoping that like Richard implied there would be some
straightforward milter I could attach and run string matching against.
Since that isn't an option though I'll let my client know and we'll move on
At 19:08 19/12/2002, Nick Seidenman wrote:
Has anyone tried a configuration that uses a different host for sending
outgoing posts than the one receiving the incoming posts?
Nick
Don't know if this will help but I reckon the incoming MTA has to be run on
the same host as Mailman but given the
I have posted on sourceforge MM 2.1 compatible versions of my patches to
support integration of MM with htdig.
There is now a third precursor patch that needs to be applied to correct
some defects in some HTML templates in the MM 2.1 distribution.
The order in which the patches should be applie
At 16:03 03/01/2003, David Gibbs wrote:
"Dan Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I located "if self.data_version >= mm_cfg.DATA_FILE_VERSION:" at line
> 611 of the /Mailman/MailList.py file. Is this what needs to be altered?
> Do I just mak
At 16:49 03/01/2003, Listmom wrote:
Has anyone been able to access the htdig patch (444884) for Mailman 2.1?
When I follow the link on source forge, I get an empty page.
--
Never raise your fist in anger. It leaves your groin unprotected.
--
Tod L Glenn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a result of som
At 21:03 03/01/2003, Jeff A. Earickson wrote:
Howdy,
I successfully upgraded from 2.0.13 to 2.1 today, with minimal fuss
and pain. Some comments:
a) I can no longer get sync_members to work. It always gives the
following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/mailman/bin
I have had several reports of people having trouble accessing patch #444884
on sourceforge.
If anyone is still having that problem then, as a temporary measure, I have
made all my MM-htdig integration patches (#661138, #444879 and #444884)
available via http://www.openinfo.demon.co.uk/mailman/i
Mon, 06 Jan 2003 11:03:15 -0800
Support Requests item #661494, was opened at 2003-01-03 03:46
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=21&aid=661494&group_id=1
Category: SF.net Tracker System
Group: Second Level Support
Status: Open
Priority:
A short saga. The guys at sourceforge have come up with the goods,
identified what was causing the problem in accessing patch #444884 and
fixed it. Good job by them. Their support response reads as follows; it was
a generic problem that this patch just happened to trip over:
Date: 2003-01-06 1
At 05:18 08/01/2003, Glenn Sieb wrote:
First I just want to say:
MAILMAN ROCKS! :)
I managed to get 2.1 and htdig all running together and working
peachykeen... :) it's a beautiful thing! My monthly mailers all work now,
creating lists from the webinterface works, etc!
However--a suggestion?
At 00:16 10/01/2003, Tokio Kikuchi wrote:
Hi,
As of 0900 JST (+0900),
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2003-January/date.html
shows 12 messages archived but it also says there are 311 messages.
Looks like all the messages before Wed Jan 8 13:55:56 EST 2003 (in
January 2003) are gon
At 20:18 10/01/2003, e. wu wrote:
Sorry for the newbie question...can anyone help me interpret this? I just
installed Mailman 2.1 on OS X with postfix using a combination of
directions off the web.
Everything seems to install fine, but when I create a new list I get this:
Traceback (most rece
t the changes in mm_cfg.py to propagate to an existing list.
Richard
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archiv
At 18:23 12/01/2003, Glenn Sieb wrote:
At 01:12 PM 1/12/2003 +, Richard Barrett posted the following...
Depends on how you want to change it. Assuming you've checked out the
final setup notes in INSTALL file, the notes in Defaults.py and made your
changes in mm_cfg.py
I've re
.
Did I miss something in the documentaion??
--Richard
--
Richard B. Pyne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-m
If you use my Mailman/htdig integration patches and are using MM 2.1 final
you will definitely find the new version of the #444884 patch I have just
uploaded useful.
This revised patch incorporates a fix for a fairly gross bug in
$prefix/Mailman/Cgi/htdig.py; don't ask: the embarrassment is too
At 01:01 17/01/2003, Jeff Schoby wrote:
Hi all, newly converted majordomo heathen here
I -think- I followed the instructions right.however, for some
reason when I create the list in the web interface, the aliases don't
get added to the virtual user table and emails to the new list I crea
At 14:46 18/01/2003, Greg Westin wrote:
I think what you want to do to fix this is add a carat ("^") before the
first slash:
RedirectMatch ^/mailman[/]*$ http://www.example.com/mailman/listinfo
That way, it only catches it if "/mailman" occurs at the beginning of
the string.
Personally, I use a
At 06:51 21/01/2003, Ghoti wrote:
As the subject indicates, I'm having something of an issue getting the web
interface to mailman working.
This is my second try with this, and I'm certain this is something quite
simple, but I'm stymied.
I've followed the instructions to the letter, and even ha
27;ve commented below on the points you raised.
Any further problems or comments with the patch then let me know.
Richard
At 23:41 21/01/2003, Steve Huston wrote:
I've applied the patches, but have had a few problems. I emailed Richard
Barrett through sourceforge, and don't know if you
be that the file added by the patch has been "corrupted"
somehow.
I'd suggest download a new copy of the latest version of the patch.
If I can be of further assistance then let me know.
Richard
mailman@mailman2:/mailman/build/patches> find . -name "htdig*.patch" |
xarg
At 16:21 22/01/2003, Todd C. Miller wrote:
After a bit of head scratching I have tracked the problem down to
privoxy (a filtering, ad-blocking proxy). It has the following
rule in its default config:
# The status bar is for displaying link targets, not pointless blahblah
#
s/([\n =;{}]|window\.)
At 15:18 24/01/2003, Stoyan Angelov wrote:
hello all,
i am trying to do a new install of Mailman 2.1 on a Solaris 7 x86 box,
gcc 2.95.2, Python 2.2.2, sendmail. I get the following error while
runnig the ./configure script:
hecking for mail wrapper group; i.e. --with-mail-gid... mail
checking f
It might be there, but I haven't found it. It would be VERY useful to
have "per domain" list creation passwords. I want to be able to have
a virtual domain owner be able to create lists within their domain
but not any others.
--Richard
--
Richard B. Pyne
[
At 16:22 24/01/2003, Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist wrote:
Is it possible to have a list that's only partially restricted?
Specifically, I'd like a list that only people within our domain
could post to.
If this is not possible, then consider this for the next iteration
of the mailman v2.x
mally adjust the Mailman templates to get them to look the way I
want, but in this case that will not work. Is there a way to interface
with mailman, cutting and pasting the source of its forms to other
directories on my web server?
Thanks,
Ri
At 14:12 29/01/2003, Tom wrote:
Simon White wrote:
>29-Jan-03 at 12:26, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>
>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>I've had a quick search thru the list archives and can't find any
>>problems that exactly match mine.
>>
>>Basically, any emails from a company 'N' to one of our lists cause
At 18:21 29/01/2003, Simon White wrote:
29-Jan-03 at 12:11, Justin Georgeson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Aha! I just noticed that the archive link from
>
> https:///mailman/listinfo//
>
> is
>
> http:///pipermail//
>
> This may seem odd, and I'd rather not go into detail, but
> http:// and https
At 20:19 29/01/2003, Marc Perkel wrote:
Where are the pending messages stored?
For MM 2.1, try looking in £prefix/data
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http:/
At 19:44 29/01/2003, Marc Perkel wrote:
I think it was working and quit. I upgraded to Mailman 2.1 and I can't
admin pending messages. It shows the pending messages with the choices -
but if I select to approve, reject, or discard - nothing happens after I
click submit. The same messages are st
At 21:07 29/01/2003, jsingh wrote:
Hey guys
I wanted to know if any has been successfully running mailman on a
Compaq Tru64 machine. My boss just asked me to move over the entire
project on a tru64 machine?
Thanks
jack
If its runningTru64 UNIX and has/you-can-install Python the answer is
al
At 00:30 30/01/2003, Justin Georgeson wrote:
Richard Barrett wrote:
At 18:21 29/01/2003, Simon White wrote:
29-Jan-03 at 12:11, Justin Georgeson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Aha! I just noticed that the archive link from
>
> https:///mailman/listinfo//
>
> is
>
&
At 21:51 29/01/2003, Jon Carnes wrote:
If you can get shell access to the server you can use the
~mailman/bin/genaliases command to generate the aliases for your created
lists. You could simply redirect the output of that command into a
local aliases file and then include that aliases file in you
At 00:08 04/02/2003, Tom Maddox wrote:
So, is it possible to disable the VERP functionality in some fashion? My
users would prefer to have regular From: and Reply-to: headers, not the
irritating VERP ones. I'm hesitant to make changes to the VERP_FORMAT and
VERP_REGEXP lines in mm_cfg.py without
At 18:13 04/02/2003, Tom Maddox wrote:
> At 00:08 04/02/2003, Tom Maddox wrote:
> >So, is it possible to disable the VERP functionality in some fashion? My
> >users would prefer to have regular From: and Reply-to: headers, not the
> >irritating VERP ones. I'm hesitant to make changes to the
> VE
At 22:42 04/02/2003, Tom Maddox wrote:
> > I tried twiddling the VERP_DELIVERY_INTERVAL setting, but it made no
> > difference.
>
> Hey Tom... a couple of questions (forgive me if they sound silly, or if
> they've already been asked):
>
> 1) Are you changing ~mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py--not
> ~mail
At 22:02 04/02/2003, Tom Maddox wrote:
> > > >So, is it possible to disable the VERP functionality in some
> fashion? My
> > > >users would prefer to have regular From: and Reply-to:
> headers, not the
> > > >irritating VERP ones. I'm hesitant to make changes to the
> > > VERP_FORMAT and
> > > >
At 11:44 05/02/2003, dino wrote:
Actually he did it this way:
Noticed that mydomain/mailman was browsable.
What additions did you make to your server's httpd.conf to support running
mailman
Telneted to port 80 and sent a get request from there...ouch.
In effect like every other request to y
out, if it is returned Mailman can reliably identify the subscriber whose
mail is being bounced.
Does that resolve the problem for you?
Regards
Richard
btw: There would normally be a minimum of four entries in a sendmail log
associated with a message posted to a list if the Mailman local sen
to better advise you with this matter. I'm afraid my appetite for
dealing with Microsoft idosyncracies/arrogance is pretty limited and I get
enough of it doing user support in my paid job. Hope you find a good solution.
Regards
Richard
Additionally, sometimes Outlook will insert the &quo
This looks as though there may be a compatibility problem between mail
coming from Mailman and way the Outlook MUA displays it that is worse with
MM 2.1 than with MM 2.0.x.
Anyone out there with experience of Microsoft products that can explain
what's described below and how to correct it?
>
At 09:25 07/02/2003, Simon White wrote:
07-Feb-03 at 01:58, Barry A. Warsaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> TM> My users don't like the new From: format, and I am trying to
> TM> get it back to the way it was, which seems like such a small
> TM> and simple thing to do but evidently is no
Try something like the following on the command line might get you started:
mailman@mailman2:/mailman/run> bin/config_list -o /tmp/mmconf.txt rbtest
mailman@mailman2:/mailman/run> python
Python 2.2.2 (#2, Jan 13 2003, 17:17:19)
[GCC 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "cred
At 16:53 08/02/2003, Paul Kleeberg wrote:
I am attempting to get htdig to work on a RedHat 8.0 system with Apache
2.0, htdig 3.2.0 and Mailman 2.1
I installed the 4 patches (668685, 661138, 444879 & 444884) to Mailman 2.1
to create the searchable archives for Mailman with htdig, and then
reins
At 22:57 08/02/2003, Paul Kleeberg wrote:
Hooray! (And thank you) It works! ...but there is still a troubling
message...
At 6:23 PM + 2/8/03, Richard Barrett wrote:
At 16:53 08/02/2003, Paul Kleeberg wrote:
I am attempting to get htdig to work on a RedHat 8.0 system with Apache
2.0
At 05:47 09/02/2003, Paul Kleeberg wrote:
If I wish to use htdig with Mailman 2.1.1, what patches will I need to
apply? (And I just got it working .)
You can try applying the 2.1 versions of the patch on the MM 2.1.1
distribution; they are quite likely to work OK. If you get no complaints or
At 11:00 09/02/2003, Gour wrote:
Richard Barrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Bear in mind I only get access to MM 2.1.1 release at the same time as
the
> rest of the user community.
Any chance that htdig integration patches enter into official release?
It is under considerati
At 05:47 09/02/2003, Paul Kleeberg wrote:
If I wish to use htdig with Mailman 2.1.1, what patches will I need to
apply? (And I just got it working .)
I have just applied the MM 2.1 versions of patches #661138, #668685,
#444879 and #444884 to the MM 2.1.1 source distribution. There are a coupl
At 18:52 09/02/2003, Paul Kleeberg wrote:
Well it may look like it will be out with the new and in with the old.
What is interesting is that RedHat lists the file as
htdig-3.2.0-7.20020505 - not a mention of the "beta" term. Must have been
a typo by someone with bad eyesight who typed "-7" ins
I have posted on sourceforge revisions of these two patches for application
to MM 2.1.1. There are no functional changes and the changes is only to
stop warnings about offsets in files when the 2.1 versions of the patches
are applied
Patch #444879: Improved archiver indexcontrol
Patch #
we have to perform a switchover.
If you have other ideas for providing low-cost resilience and redundancy
for a Mailman server then I would like to hear them.
Cheers
Richard
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.
At 04:06 11/02/2003, Matthew Davis wrote:
* Paul Kleeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What you say is correct but won't that put a "legacy" URL into
> Default.py whereas if I used the (undocumented?) parameters below,
> would it build Default.py with the correct URLs and therefore
> eliminate the
At 08:01 12/02/2003, Andy Woolley wrote:
Hi All,
I need to edit the archive of one of my lists to remove some text that a
user is worried will be found on Search Engines.
I've looked and see that this feature is to be added to Version 3.0 and
possibly to version 2.1.
My question is: Did this fe
At 13:56 12/02/2003, Alberto Marcedone wrote:
[root@server mailman]# /home/mailman/bin/mailmanctl start
Lista di sito mancante: mailman
"mailmanctl start" does not work. All my mailing list are stopped.
I have not a list called mailman.
Here is the log:
Feb 12 15:59:03 2003 mailmanctl(2628): Lis
At 14:22 12/02/2003, Ashley Horn wrote:
When bulk subscribing members to a mailman list (Version 2.1.1) through
the web interface is it possible to associate a name with an e-mail
address? What is the correct format for this process?
Thanks,
Ashley Horn
Adding lines like the next (non-blank) o
At 12:11 12/02/2003, Links at Momsview wrote:
I currently have a VERY large ( >100k) announce only list (always
moderated) running mailman 2.1 under Postfix.
For performance reasons I'm considering splitting this list into 26 sublists
based on the first letter of each subscriber email.
I would
digest
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
This
1 - 100 of 1295 matches
Mail list logo
