nikic wrote:
See also https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76981.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135156
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp --
llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135118
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commi
@@ -2759,6 +2762,29 @@ MCSection
*TargetLoweringObjectFileXCOFF::getSectionForLSDA(
//===--===//
TargetLoweringObjectFileGOFF::TargetLoweringObjectFileGOFF() = default;
+void TargetLoweringObjectFileGOFF::ge
https://github.com/bjope updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135155
From 0abeb7b7eea0e15e15c98a8e4f8501fde81d4811 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bjorn Pettersson
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:27:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [InstCombine] Improve inbounds preservation for ADD+GEP
->
https://github.com/jmorse commented:
Are there any expected interactions between atom-group-numbers and loading
bitcode? i.e., if we serialise the literal atom-group-number to the output and
then read it back in again, then it might conflict with atom-group-numbers seen
in other functions in o
https://github.com/jmorse edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133478
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -1366,6 +1367,43 @@ TEST_F(DILocationTest, discriminatorSpecialCases) {
EXPECT_EQ(std::nullopt, L4->cloneByMultiplyingDuplicationFactor(0x1000));
}
+TEST_F(DILocationTest, KeyInstructions) {
+ Context.pImpl->NextAtomGroup = 1;
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(Context.pImpl->NextAtomGroup,
llvmbot wrote:
@RKSimon What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135191
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135191
Backport 08e080ee98832c2aec6f379b04f486bea18730cc
Requested by: @RKSimon
>From bcb6ae86466e917786310b3133a2df6a776923fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Schmidt
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 11:19:26 +0200
Subjec
@@ -335,6 +335,14 @@ class LLVMContext {
StringRef getDefaultTargetFeatures();
void setDefaultTargetFeatures(StringRef Features);
+ /// Key Instructions: update the highest number atom group emitted for any
+ /// function.
+ void updateAtomGroupWaterline(uint64_t G);
+
github-actions[bot] wrote:
⚠️ We detected that you are using a GitHub private e-mail address to contribute
to the repo. Please turn off [Keep my email addresses
private](https://github.com/settings/emails) setting in your account. See
[LLVM
Discourse](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/hidden-email
https://github.com/bjope updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135155
From 0abeb7b7eea0e15e15c98a8e4f8501fde81d4811 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bjorn Pettersson
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:27:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [InstCombine] Improve inbounds preservation for ADD+GEP
->
https://github.com/kaadam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129231
From 93c958c3f016092c340e897aeabbb470e58b9dbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adam Kallai
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 17:00:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add initial support for SPE brstack
Perf will be able to report
@@ -113,6 +153,37 @@ TEST_F(PerfSpeEventsTestHelper, SpeBranches) {
EXPECT_TRUE(checkEvents(1234, 10, {"branches-spe:"}));
}
+TEST_F(PerfSpeEventsTestHelper, SpeBranchesWithBrstack) {
+ // Check perf input with SPE branch events as brstack format.
+ // Example collection c
Author: Michael Kruse
Date: 2025-04-10T11:54:53+02:00
New Revision: 6c3643905210c717831a18d4af1ae921a1ad9f74
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6c3643905210c717831a18d4af1ae921a1ad9f74
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6c3643905210c717831a18d4af1ae921a1ad9f74.diff
@@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ CHECK-SPE-NO-LBR: PERF2BOLT: Starting data aggregation job
RUN: perf record -e cycles -q -o %t.perf.data -- %t.exe
RUN: not perf2bolt -p %t.perf.data -o %t.perf.boltdata --spe %t.exe 2>&1 |
FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-SPE-LBR
-CHECK-SPE-LBR: PERF2BOLT-
https://github.com/kaadam updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129231
From 93c958c3f016092c340e897aeabbb470e58b9dbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adam Kallai
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 17:00:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add initial support for SPE brstack
Perf will be able to report
https://github.com/vpykhtin ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135181
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ritter-x2a updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131862
>From 4b88628633b065f3d8cc24d4f3bd4e3274fcc75a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Ritter
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 06:51:16 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [SDAG] Introduce inbounds flag for pointer arithmetic
This p
https://github.com/ritter-x2a updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132353
>From b3a2dc9d2642a79cc3251db2623464075f206e12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Ritter
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 03:33:02 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [AMDGPU][SDAG] Only fold flat offsets if they are inbounds
F
https://github.com/ritter-x2a updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131862
>From 4b88628633b065f3d8cc24d4f3bd4e3274fcc75a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Ritter
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 06:51:16 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [SDAG] Introduce inbounds flag for pointer arithmetic
This p
https://github.com/vpykhtin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135181
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135123
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ritter-x2a updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132353
>From b3a2dc9d2642a79cc3251db2623464075f206e12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Ritter
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 03:33:02 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [AMDGPU][SDAG] Only fold flat offsets if they are inbounds
F
@@ -1357,6 +1357,8 @@ void
TextNodeDumper::VisitTemplateExpansionTemplateArgument(
void TextNodeDumper::VisitExpressionTemplateArgument(
const TemplateArgument &TA) {
OS << " expr";
+ if (TA.isCanonicalExpr())
+OS << " canon";
erichkeane wrote:
Sam
@@ -1305,9 +1305,13 @@ void StmtPrinter::VisitDeclRefExpr(DeclRefExpr *Node) {
Qualifier->print(OS, Policy);
if (Node->hasTemplateKeyword())
OS << "template ";
+
+ bool ForceAnonymous =
+ Policy.PrintAsCanonical && VD->getKind() == Decl::NonTypeTemplateParm;
---
@@ -1724,6 +1724,8 @@ void
JSONNodeDumper::VisitTemplateExpansionTemplateArgument(
void JSONNodeDumper::VisitExpressionTemplateArgument(
const TemplateArgument &TA) {
JOS.attribute("isExpr", true);
+ if (TA.isCanonicalExpr())
+JOS.attribute("isCanon", true);
---
OCHyams wrote:
> Possibly part of the design here is to simply not care, if it's only about
> internal consistency within a Function (does that hold after inlining too).
> Apologies if this is all explained in a later patch.
It is indeed the goal not to care; an instruction is only considered
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 47a986de762147c4f27a20ff9b1d75f9f5a50bdc
aec7a556fed56c72184963d21d6893e586d6a7e2 --e
@@ -1305,9 +1305,13 @@ void StmtPrinter::VisitDeclRefExpr(DeclRefExpr *Node) {
Qualifier->print(OS, Policy);
if (Node->hasTemplateKeyword())
OS << "template ";
+
+ bool ForceAnonymous =
+ Policy.PrintAsCanonical && VD->getKind() == Decl::NonTypeTemplateParm;
---
https://github.com/kbeyls edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133461
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135133
>From e8ab5ff779bc00ff6a239f0acea8182c69cb7bcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matheus Izvekov
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 02:52:36 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] implement printing of canonical template arguments of
https://github.com/vpykhtin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135180
None
>From 367db01dcf1d8f6305e86e624306f4aefc0b1f95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Valery Pykhtin
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:56:57 +
Subject: [PATCH] ssaupdaterbulk_add_phi_optimization
---
.../llvm/Trans
vpykhtin wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/135180?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning"
@@ -88,6 +89,45 @@ struct PerfSpeEventsTestHelper : public testing::Test {
return SampleSize == DA.BasicSamples.size();
}
+
+ /// Compare LBREntries
+ bool checkLBREntry(const LBREntry &Lhs, const LBREntry &Rhs) {
+return Lhs.From == Rhs.From && Lhs.To == Rhs.To &&
vpykhtin wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/135181?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning"
https://github.com/vpykhtin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135180
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/vpykhtin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135180
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/vpykhtin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135180
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/vpykhtin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135180
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/vpykhtin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135181
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/vpykhtin ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135180
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Valery Pykhtin (vpykhtin)
Changes
This is a replacement PR for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132004,
stacked version.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135180.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Valery Pykhtin (vpykhtin)
Changes
This is a replacement PR for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130611,
stacked version.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135181.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modif
@@ -180,13 +178,16 @@ void DataAggregator::start() {
if (opts::ArmSPE) {
if (!opts::BasicAggregation) {
- errs() << "PERF2BOLT-ERROR: Arm SPE mode is combined only with "
-"BasicAggregation.\n";
- exit(1);
+ // pidfrom_ip to_ip
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ class ValueMap {
using ValueMapCVH = ValueMapCallbackVH;
using MapT = DenseMap>;
using MDMapT = DenseMap;
+ /// Map {(InlinedAt, old atom number) -> new atom number}.
+ using DMAtomT = DenseMap, uint64_t>;
jmorse wrote:
Consider using
@@ -105,6 +105,13 @@ enum RemapFlags {
/// Any global values not in value map are mapped to null instead of mapping
/// to self. Illegal if RF_IgnoreMissingLocals is also set.
RF_NullMapMissingGlobalValues = 8,
+
+ /// Do not remap atom instances. Only safe if to do thi
@@ -117,9 +118,21 @@ struct ClonedCodeInfo {
/// If you would like to collect additional information about the cloned
/// function, you can specify a ClonedCodeInfo object with the optional fifth
/// parameter.
+///
+/// Set \p MapAtoms to false to skip mapping source atoms for
@@ -105,6 +105,13 @@ enum RemapFlags {
/// Any global values not in value map are mapped to null instead of mapping
/// to self. Illegal if RF_IgnoreMissingLocals is also set.
RF_NullMapMissingGlobalValues = 8,
+
+ /// Do not remap atom instances. Only safe if to do thi
https://github.com/jmorse edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133479
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -105,6 +105,13 @@ enum RemapFlags {
/// Any global values not in value map are mapped to null instead of mapping
/// to self. Illegal if RF_IgnoreMissingLocals is also set.
RF_NullMapMissingGlobalValues = 8,
+
+ /// Do not remap atom instances. Only safe if to do thi
https://github.com/jmorse approved this pull request.
LGTM, code and tests are good. As ever all my comments are about comments and
maintainability!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133479
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-comm
@@ -284,6 +291,9 @@ inline void RemapInstruction(Instruction *I,
ValueToValueMapTy &VM,
.remapInstruction(*I);
}
+/// Remap source atom. Called by RemapInstruction.
jmorse wrote:
IMO too terse; needs some purpose and context.
https://github.com/llvm/l
https://github.com/nikic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134689
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -1761,6 +1761,9 @@ void RelocationBaseSection::computeRels() {
llvm::sort(nonRelative, irelative, [&](auto &a, auto &b) {
return std::tie(a.r_sym, a.r_offset) < std::tie(b.r_sym, b.r_offset);
});
+llvm::sort(irelative, relocs.end(), [&](auto &a, auto &b) {
@@ -1964,6 +1979,26 @@ void elf::postScanRelocations(Ctx &ctx) {
for (ELFFileBase *file : ctx.objectFiles)
for (Symbol *sym : file->getLocalSymbols())
fn(*sym);
+
+ // Now that we have checked all ifunc symbols for demotion to regular
function
+ // symbols, move
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ void printTraceSymbol(const Symbol &sym, StringRef name);
enum {
NEEDS_GOT = 1 << 0,
NEEDS_PLT = 1 << 1,
+ // True if this is an ifunc with a direct relocation that cannot be
smithp35 wrote:
Although not new, could be worth expanding on
@@ -1357,6 +1357,8 @@ void
TextNodeDumper::VisitTemplateExpansionTemplateArgument(
void TextNodeDumper::VisitExpressionTemplateArgument(
const TemplateArgument &TA) {
OS << " expr";
+ if (TA.isCanonicalExpr())
+OS << " canon";
mizvekov wrote:
Done
https://github.com/vpykhtin created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135181
None
>From c22138d41a4e1d81f3017478bfe9496fc80164f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Valery Pykhtin
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:58:13 +
Subject: [PATCH] amdgpu_use_ssaupdaterbulk_in_structurizecfg
---
llvm/l
https://github.com/smithp35 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133531
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-elf
Author: Peter Collingbourne (pcc)
Changes
This lock is unnecessary because we can add the relocations to
shards and let them be sorted later.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135123.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified)
arsenm wrote:
### Merge activity
* **Apr 9, 12:21 PM EDT**: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull
request via
[Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/135024).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135024
_
@@ -3087,12 +3087,22 @@ Instruction
*InstCombinerImpl::visitGetElementPtrInst(GetElementPtrInst &GEP) {
return nullptr;
if (GEP.getNumIndices() == 1) {
-// We can only preserve inbounds if the original gep is inbounds, the add
-// is nsw, and the add operands ar
@@ -3087,12 +3087,22 @@ Instruction
*InstCombinerImpl::visitGetElementPtrInst(GetElementPtrInst &GEP) {
return nullptr;
if (GEP.getNumIndices() == 1) {
-// We can only preserve inbounds if the original gep is inbounds, the add
-// is nsw, and the add operands ar
@@ -3087,12 +3087,22 @@ Instruction
*InstCombinerImpl::visitGetElementPtrInst(GetElementPtrInst &GEP) {
return nullptr;
if (GEP.getNumIndices() == 1) {
-// We can only preserve inbounds if the original gep is inbounds, the add
-// is nsw, and the add operands ar
https://github.com/ritter-x2a updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132353
>From 11282b1d43e87a092a6d21cc23e6962b65554eb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Ritter
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 03:33:02 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [AMDGPU][SDAG] Only fold flat offsets if they are inbounds
F
https://github.com/ritter-x2a updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131862
>From 75e41ae17d5daae609c6f25025c730e9bb3924bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Ritter
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 06:51:16 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [SDAG] Introduce inbounds flag for pointer arithmetic
This p
https://github.com/ritter-x2a updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131862
>From 75e41ae17d5daae609c6f25025c730e9bb3924bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabian Ritter
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 06:51:16 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [SDAG] Introduce inbounds flag for pointer arithmetic
This p
https://github.com/philnik777 approved this pull request.
LGTM assuming the diff landed is the same I see. I'm really not a fan of
complicating things unnecessarily though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132291
___
llvm-branch-commits mail
https://github.com/mtrofin updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134766
>From 97908a0b652420ce82f3fe965f8eb12002e74a85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mircea Trofin
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 18:22:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [ctxprof] Flatten indirect call info in pre-thinlink
compilation
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134691
This could be more relaxed, and look for uses of globals in
the same function but no tests apparently depend on that.
>From f543f056aa7e16b1f793d018e0b9c022b006f477 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Arsenault
arsenm wrote:
> [!WARNING]
> This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is
> open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack href="https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/134689?utm_source=stack-comment-downstack-mergeability-warning";
https://github.com/wrotki updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133832
>From ca129ea5996c2f2b99868bccd2246690a65b6c9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mariusz Borsa
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 17:06:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Sanitizers][Darwin][Test] XFAIL malloc_zone.cpp
The malloc_zone
https://github.com/mtrofin ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134468
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -5039,10 +5039,26 @@ calculateRegisterUsage(VPlan &Plan,
ArrayRef VFs,
// even in the scalar case.
RegUsage[ClassID] += 1;
} else {
+ElementCount VF = VFs[J];
+// The output from scaled phis and scaled reductions act
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135191
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 08e080ee98832c2aec6f379b04f486bea18730cc
Requested by: @RKSimon
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135191.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FixupVecto
https://github.com/pcc updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132291
>From 89ce369ab9b49b8c23a87ad0a888002dd85c094c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Collingbourne
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:12:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Format
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1
---
libcxx/test/lib
https://github.com/pcc updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132291
>From 89ce369ab9b49b8c23a87ad0a888002dd85c094c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Collingbourne
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:12:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Format
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1
---
libcxx/test/lib
https://github.com/pcc updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135123
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/pcc updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135123
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/qcolombet approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135024
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134711
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/pcc updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132291
>From 89ce369ab9b49b8c23a87ad0a888002dd85c094c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Collingbourne
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:12:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Format
Created using spr 1.3.6-beta.1
---
libcxx/test/lib
https://github.com/pcc edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133530
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -16,105 +16,50 @@
//===--===//
#include "polly/CodePreparation.h"
-#include "polly/LinkAllPasses.h"
#include "polly/Support/ScopHelper.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/DominanceFrontier.h"
#include "llvm/Anal
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
; RUN: opt -passes=loop-vectorize -enable-epilogue-vectorization=false
-mattr=+neon,+dotprod -force-vector-interleave=1 -S < %s | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes=CHECK-INTERLEAVE1
; RUN: opt -passes=loop-vectorize -enable-epilogue-vectorization=false
-mattr=+neo
https://github.com/vpykhtin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135180
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: undef deprecator found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git diff -U0 --pickaxe-regex -S
'([^a-zA-Z0-9#_-]undef[^a-zA-Z0-9_-]|UndefValue::get)' 'HEAD~1' HEAD
llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar
@@ -239,6 +298,63 @@ class GOFFWriter {
GOFFWriter::GOFFWriter(raw_pwrite_stream &OS, MCAssembler &Asm)
: OS(OS), Asm(Asm) {}
+void GOFFWriter::defineSectionSymbols(const MCSectionGOFF &Section) {
+ if (Section.isSD()) {
+GOFFSymbol SD(Section.getName(), Section.getId
@@ -191,16 +201,27 @@ define void @test_tailcall_omit_mov_x16_x16(ptr %objptr)
#0 {
define i32 @test_call_omit_extra_moves(ptr %objptr) #0 {
; CHECK-LABEL: test_call_omit_extra_moves:
; DARWIN-NEXT: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
-; ELF-NEXT: str x30, [sp, #-16]!
-;
https://github.com/smithp35 commented:
How does this work in the non-PIE (PDE) case when we take the address of an
ifunc and pass it to a function in a shared library, which then compares the
argument with its own global address take of the ifunc?
For example:
shared lib
```
typedef void Fptr(
smithp35 wrote:
I have some small reservations about using ifunc resolvers like this. Mostly in
that we are using a mechanism invented for a different purpose, and relying on
some specific linker behaviour to make this case work.
This is similar to comments made in the Discourse post
https://
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-debuginfo
Author: Matheus Izvekov (mizvekov)
Changes
This patch extends the canonicalization printing policy to cover expressions
and template names, and wires that up to the template argument printer,
covering expressions.
This is helpful for debuggi
@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ namespace llvm {
class GOFFObjectWriter;
class MCGOFFStreamer : public MCObjectStreamer {
+ std::string RootSDName;
+ std::string ADAPRName;
uweigand wrote:
These are no longer used, I think.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/1337
@@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ CHECK-SPE-NO-LBR: PERF2BOLT: Starting data aggregation job
RUN: perf record -e cycles -q -o %t.perf.data -- %t.exe
RUN: not perf2bolt -p %t.perf.data -o %t.perf.boltdata --spe %t.exe 2>&1 |
FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-SPE-LBR
-CHECK-SPE-LBR: PERF2BOLT-
@@ -46,6 +46,11 @@ define i1 @select_exit_cond(ptr %start, ptr %end, i64 %N) {
; CHECK-NEXT:[[STEP_ADD_5:%.*]] = add <2 x i64> [[STEP_ADD_4]], splat (i64
2)
; CHECK-NEXT:[[STEP_ADD_6:%.*]] = add <2 x i64> [[STEP_ADD_5]], splat (i64
2)
; CHECK-NEXT:[[STEP_ADD_7:%.*
https://github.com/matthias-springer created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135051
The LLVM dialect no longer has its own vector types. It uses `mlir::VectorType`
everywhere. Remove `LLVM::getFixedVectorType/getScalableVectorType` and use
`VectorType::get` instead. This commit addre
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134869
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
