Hello,
On 07/02/2018 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote:
> Dear testers,
>
> There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in
> a better state now.
>
> 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506.
>
> Please test, let me know how it goes, and upload binaries.
Loo
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 7 Feb 2018, at 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
> wrote:
>>
>> There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in
>> a better state now.
>>
>> 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506.
>>
>> Please test, let
Hello everyone,
Source, docs and binaries for LLVM-6.0.0-rc2 are now available at
http://prereleases.llvm.org/6.0.0/#rc2
I'll add more binaries as they become available.
Please report any problems you find, ideally as bugs marked as
blockers of http://llvm.org/PR35804
Thanks,
Hans
_
W dniu śro, 07.02.2018 o godzinie 21∶51 +0100, użytkownik Hans Wennborg
via Release-testers napisał:
> Dear testers,
>
> There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in
> a better state now.
>
> 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506.
>
> Please test, let me know how it
> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 7 Feb 2018, at 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in
>>> a better state now.
>>>
>>> 6
On 9 Feb 2018, at 20:40, Dimitry Andric via cfe-dev
wrote:
>
>> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg wrote:
...
>> What are all these test failures? Does it seems like they have a
>> common root cause and do we have a bug for it?
...
> The Clang Tools and Extra Tools Unit tests all appear to
On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:11, Dimitry Andric via Openmp-dev
wrote:
>
> On 9 Feb 2018, at 20:40, Dimitry Andric via cfe-dev
> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9 Feb 2018, at 10:20, Hans Wennborg wrote:
> ...
>>> What are all these test failures? Does it seems like they have a
>>> common root cause and do we have
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36331
Bug ID: 36331
Summary: Assertion failed: (idx < GetSize()), function
GetItemAtIndex, file StructuredData.h, line 188
Product: lldb
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
DWARFDebugPubnamesSet.h has a type definition like this:
typedef std::unordered_multimap,
CStringEqualBinaryPredicate>
cstr_to_index_mmap;
In particular, note that the hasher will hash the *pointer *rather than the
string it points to.
It looks like this
A quick glance indicates that this is all dead code. I can't see anything that
actually instantiates either of the pubnames classes.
The DWARF pubnames tables were a previous attempt at producing DWARF indexes,
but they didn't contain enough information to actually forstall deep dives into
the
10 matches
Mail list logo
