On 31 May 2017 at 19:40, Jim Ingham wrote:
> Pavel, can you say more about your idea?
>
> In both ObjC and C++ methods, you can refer to an ivar either as "this->ivar"
> or just "ivar". But the DWARF for C++ doesn't tell lldb that a particular
> language supports referring to ivars transparentl
Pavel, this is pretty much exactly what happens. (Except that there is
no frontend. The substitution is done during CodeGen. But that is just a
detail)
I think a more general solution, that doesn't tie mulle-objc implicitly
to the dwarf format would be better in the long term though.
Ciao
Na
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:44 AM Matthias Braun via llvm-dev <
llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> > On May 31, 2017, at 4:06 AM, Pavel Labath wrote:
> >
> > Thank you all for the pointers. I am going to look at these to see if
> > there is anything that we could reuse, and come back. In the mean
