Quick re-cap.
After a few rounds, not only the "external server" proposal got
obliterated as totally unnecessary, but the idea that we may even need
a hook at all is now challenged.
Jared's idea to use "git describe" is in line with previous proposals
to use rev-list --count and to do so only up
On 5 Jul 2016, at 11:44, Renato Golin via llvm-foundation
wrote:
>
> Just for reference, GitHub *does* have an SVN interface [1], and you
> can already checkout a specific revision with "svn checkout -r NNN
> repo", which *is already* using "git rev-list --count".
>
> This means that, for SVN b
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28428
Bug ID: 28428
Summary: lldb.SBProcess.is_running and
lldb.SBProcess.is_stopped Python accessors
Product: lldb
Version: 3.8
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
You should sample lldb-mi to see what it is doing. Also if you can get a more
complete packet log of the traffic between Eclipse and lldb-mi we might be able
to see what is going on. Another thing to note: if you are remote debugging to
a Mac from another machine and don't have any files cached
Since your compile unit is Java:
> 0x000b: TAG_compile_unit [1] *
> AT_producer( "RoboVM 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT" )
> AT_language( DW_LANG_Java )
> AT_name( "Main.java" )
> AT_stmt_list( 0x )
> AT_comp_dir(
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28428
Greg Clayton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On 5 July 2016 at 12:13, David Chisnall wrote:
> Note that GitHub (currently, at least) doesn’t export submodules sensibly
> with their svn version.
SVN users can continue using the projects directly, they *just* need
to change the SVN repository location of every project to GitHub.
It can't ge
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Tom Honermann via llvm-dev <
llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> We're using tags in this manner for our internal repos and LLVM/Clang
> mirrors and haven't experienced any problems. We're at ~50k tags for
> our most used repo, so not quite at hundreds of thousands y
> On Jul 5, 2016, at 3:44 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev
> wrote:
>
> Quick re-cap.
>
> After a few rounds, not only the "external server" proposal got
> obliterated as totally unnecessary, but the idea that we may even need
> a hook at all is now challenged.
This is not clear to me.
How is t
On 5 Jul 2016 10:45 p.m., "Mehdi Amini" wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 5, 2016, at 3:44 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <
llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Quick re-cap.
> >
> > After a few rounds, not only the "external server" proposal got
> > obliterated as totally unnecessary, but the idea that we
We'll be at Tied House as usual, starting on Thursday the 7th at 7pm!
If you can, help us plan and RSVP here: http://meetu.ps/2XQyLm
See everyone there!
George
___
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
11 matches
Mail list logo
