Re: [lldb-dev] Review of API and remote packets

2016-04-12 Thread Ravitheja Addepally via lldb-dev
One of the downsides of using the gdb protocol is that these packets are stateful meaning the thread id option is not there and the word btrace stands for branch trace which basically suggests execution tracing. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Pavel Labath wrote: > I think we should reuse packe

Re: [lldb-dev] Review of API and remote packets

2016-04-12 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-dev
LLDB already has the QThreadSuffixSupported extension, which adds the ";thread:" suffix to a bunch of packets. We could say that if the client requests this extension, we will support it on these packets as well. Otherwise we fall back to the "Hg" thingy. I haven't looked at how hard it would be t

[lldb-dev] [Bug 27326] New: Provide a way to exit lldb with a non-zero exit status

2016-04-12 Thread via lldb-dev
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27326 Bug ID: 27326 Summary: Provide a way to exit lldb with a non-zero exit status Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: norma