https://github.com/da-viper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163976
>From c20a05867dc386698c28d6244b88959686b29c48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ebuka Ezike
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 11:39:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb-dap] Send an Invalidated event on thread stack
change.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Ebuka Ezike (da-viper)
Changes
show information about the signal when the user presses `process handle
` i.e
```sh
(lldb) process handle SIGWINCH
NAME PASS STOP NOTIFY DESCRIPTION
=== = = ===
https://github.com/da-viper created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164176
show information about the signal when the user presses `process handle
` i.e
```sh
(lldb) process handle SIGWINCH
NAME PASS STOP NOTIFY DESCRIPTION
=== = = == =
@@ -1571,6 +1571,25 @@ class Process : public
std::enable_shared_from_this,
virtual size_t ReadMemory(lldb::addr_t vm_addr, void *buf, size_t size,
Status &error);
+ /// Read from multiple memory ranges and write the results into buffer.
---
emrekultursay wrote:
This PR seems to have broken the `platform process list` behavior for Android:
#164192
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160931
___
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mail
@@ -225,3 +227,63 @@ TEST_F(MemoryTest, TesetMemoryCacheRead) {
// instead of using an
// old cache
}
+
+/// A process class that reads `lower_byte(address)` for each `
@@ -225,3 +227,63 @@ TEST_F(MemoryTest, TesetMemoryCacheRead) {
// instead of using an
// old cache
}
+
+/// A process class that reads `lower_byte(address)` for each `
@@ -1971,6 +1971,34 @@ size_t Process::ReadMemory(addr_t addr, void *buf,
size_t size, Status &error) {
}
}
+llvm::SmallVector>
+Process::ReadMemoryRanges(llvm::ArrayRef> ranges,
+ llvm::MutableArrayRef buffer) {
+ llvm::SmallVector> results;
+
+
https://github.com/kazutakahirata created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164191
None
>From cf21a5bd82a0582b2a140d6f2d71615e162e93b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 13:22:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Remove a redundant call to std::unique_ptr::ge
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164191.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/unittests/DAP/TestBase.cpp (+1-1)
``diff
diff --git a/lldb/unittests/DAP/TestBase.c
felipepiovezan wrote:
> What's the thinking for doing this in "ptrace style" where the caller
> allocates a buffer and gives it to the function, vs. allocating the buffer on
> behalf of the caller?
No real motivation other than "the other APIs in `Process` do this, so this
must have been disc
11 matches
Mail list logo
