https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161688
>From 7300143d42a2a496d5ce522c7f862cb458fa6d9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 16:24:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [lldb][Expression] Emit a 'Note' diagnistc that indicates
https://github.com/Michael137 commented:
I have the suspicion that this could be done simpler.
`CXXRecordDecl::lookupInBases` is already perfectly capable of finding field in
anonymous structures in bases. That's why the expression evaluator is able to
find them just fine.
I think the actual
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158256
___
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158256
___
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/DavidSpickett approved this pull request.
LGTM, I see that NetBSD and Linux do this too.
Though I doubt whether debugging works on those platforms either, and I don't
think we have upstream tests for it so I won't demand them here.
This change applies to AArch64 as well, rig
@@ -167,6 +167,12 @@ function(add_lldb_executable name)
)
target_link_libraries(${name} PRIVATE ${ARG_LINK_LIBS})
+ if(WIN32)
+list(FIND ARG_LINK_LIBS liblldb LIBLLDB_INDEX)
+if(NOT LIBLLDB_INDEX EQUAL -1)
+ target_link_options(${name} PRIVATE
"/DELAYLOAD:$.
mstorsjo wrote:
> This, combined with `liblldb.dll` being delay loaded, allows to package
> `python.dll` with the `llvm` installer.
Just for reference - for llvm-mingw, we've been bundling a python install in
our toolchain as well, but we've solved this slightly differently. We've just
copied
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Martin Storsjö (mstorsjo)
Changes
ec28b95b7491bc2fbb6ec66cdbfd939e71255c42 made liblldb delayloaded, but the
supplied command line parameter is only valid for MSVC style builds.
For mingw builds using LLD, we can easily pass a similar opti
https://github.com/DrSergei updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162517
>From 3d548533d38277eb2ba59c810f7634909bb7adbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Druzhkov Sergei
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 11:38:55 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb-dap] Allow empty memory reference in disassemble
ar
@@ -789,6 +789,10 @@ def canRunLibcxxTests():
return True, "libc++ always present"
if platform == "linux":
+if not configuration.libcxx_include_dir or not
configuration.libcxx_library_dir:
+return False, "API tests require a locally built libc+
DavidSpickett wrote:
> --category libc++
It shows 68 skipped, did you paste the wrong output?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162657
___
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ll
aokblast wrote:
> I can merge this if you need me to.
Sure. Thanks for your help!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162811
___
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
> As in, I wanted to show that the simluators aren't part of the libc++
> category :p
Ok I see now. You enabled only that category, to show that no simulator test
falls into it. Rather than disabling the category, to show that all the
simulator tests ran (because how woul
https://github.com/smallzhong closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161955
___
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/mstorsjo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162809
___
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
My impression is that 32-bit executables are much more common on x86. To the
point where there are standard flags like `-m32`, which we do not have for
AArch64/AArch32.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162811
___
lldb-co
smallzhong wrote:
Sorry, I accidentally created a pull request for all commits. I'll close this
one and create a new one.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161955
___
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/mstorsjo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162831
___
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
felipepiovezan wrote:
> the need for coroutine stack traces. I need to splice in additional stack
> frames in the middle of real, physical stack frames.
@vogelsgesang Have you considered writing a custom unwinder for this? If you
want stack frames from which you can perform step operations, I
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+"""
+Tests the exit code/description coming from the debugserver.
+"""
+
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
+
+
+@skipUnlessDarwin
+@skipIfOutOfTreeDebugserver
+class T
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+"""
+Tests the exit code/description coming from the debugserver.
DavidSpickett wrote:
"...when handling MultiMemRead packets."
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162670
___
lldb-commits mailin
https://github.com/aperez closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162752
___
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/aokblast updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162890
>From 02a3bd3f786925b22f29a8c9f7c9a1db2c9dbec4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ShengYi Hung
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 01:07:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [LLDB, FreeBSD, x86] Fix empty register set when trying to
get
Author: Michael Buch
Date: 2025-10-10T19:23:02+01:00
New Revision: e3620fe0685c656915977d55f822a82090041965
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e3620fe0685c656915977d55f822a82090041965
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e3620fe0685c656915977d55f822a82090041965.diff
https://github.com/adrian-prantl approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162657
___
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -789,6 +789,10 @@ def canRunLibcxxTests():
return True, "libc++ always present"
if platform == "linux":
+if not configuration.libcxx_include_dir or not
configuration.libcxx_library_dir:
+return False, "API tests require a locally built libc+
@@ -426,6 +433,47 @@ SBError Driver::ProcessArgs(const opt::InputArgList &args,
bool &exiting) {
return error;
}
+#ifdef _WIN32
+// Returns the full path to the lldb.exe executable
+inline std::wstring GetPathToExecutableW() {
+ // Iterate until we reach the Windows max pa
Michael137 wrote:
> Ping - I'd like to use the added test from this PR as the "current state" and
> fix the missing things from above in other PRs.
Will some time today. Sorry for the delay!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156250
___
lldb-
@@ -9,6 +10,16 @@ import { LogFilePathProvider, LogType } from "./logging";
const exec = util.promisify(child_process.execFile);
+/**
walter-erquinigo wrote:
better use this package https://www.npmjs.com/package/untildify
there are some interesting cases rel
29 matches
Mail list logo
