DavidSpickett wrote:
Once my comments are addressed this will be good to land. Only concern was
changing the default behaviour, and this PR does not go anywhere near that now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143126
___
lldb-commits mailing l
@@ -88,3 +88,10 @@ def test_save_core_via_process_plugin(self):
os.unlink(core)
except OSError:
pass
+
+def test_help(self):
+"""Test that help shows minidump as an option in plugin-names."""
DavidSpickett
@@ -16,4 +16,4 @@ run
DavidSpickett wrote:
I think you need a test for the error when a specific plugin name is given, vs
when no name is given.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143126
___
lldb-commits mail
https://github.com/charles-zablit updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144731
>From 3c9a3e5e9af0c9d58783c11490bda473ada84ef3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Zablit
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 16:41:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [lldb] upgrade HandleFrameFormatVariable callees to
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144645
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
DavidSpickett wrote:
Though I cannot reproduce the failure, so it could be to do with the high load
when run on the bots. Some process being deprioritised.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144768
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lis
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145015
It creates a pair of connected sockets using the simplest mechanism for the
given platform (TCP on windows, socketpair(2) elsewhere).
Main motivation is to remove the ugly platform-specific code in
ProcessGDBRe
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
It creates a pair of connected sockets using the simplest mechanism for the
given platform (TCP on windows, socketpair(2) elsewhere).
Main motivation is to remove the ugly platform-specific code in
ProcessGDB
https://github.com/da-viper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143126
>From fc849bd4e831f9dc6f53be3a8508e1eb33f4151c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ebuka Ezike
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:15:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] add plugin names to process save-core error
output.
s
https://github.com/labath created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145017
This lets get rid of platform-specific code in ProcessGDBRemote and use the
same code path (module differences in socket types) everywhere. It also unlocks
further cleanups in the debugserver launching code.
Depe
da-viper wrote:
The mach-o plugin works but the pecoff is an alias to minidump
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/4ec6d127c1857e77d70236b15b03d23ba1283a3d/lldb/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/Mach-O/ObjectFileMachO.cpp#L6642-L6670
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/4ec6d127c1857e77d7023
@@ -2008,38 +1979,54 @@ bool CPlusPlusLanguage::HandleFrameFormatVariable(
return true;
}
case FormatEntity::Entry::Type::FunctionReturnRight: {
-std::optional return_rhs = GetDemangledReturnTypeRHS(sc);
-if (!return_rhs)
+auto return_rhs_or_err = GetDemangl
https://github.com/Michael137 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144998
Starting with https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124790, Clang emits
`DW_AT_object_pointer` encoded as integer constants rather than DIE references.
This patch accounts for this.
>From 22e8f644c3cd88
https://github.com/charles-zablit updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144731
>From 3c9a3e5e9af0c9d58783c11490bda473ada84ef3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Zablit
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 16:41:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [lldb] upgrade HandleFrameFormatVariable callees to
@@ -88,3 +88,10 @@ def test_save_core_via_process_plugin(self):
os.unlink(core)
except OSError:
pass
+
+def test_help(self):
+"""Test that help shows minidump as an option in plugin-names."""
+self.expect(
+
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+CXX_SOURCES := main.cpp
+
+CXXFLAGS_EXTRAS := -std=c++14 -O0
labath wrote:
-O0 shouldn't be necessary and -std=c++14 should be set
[here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/e970f59e6b20dddc4369735affb79ca9be240c1c/lldb/packages/Python/lld
@@ -239,122 +240,39 @@
VectorIteratorSyntheticFrontEnd::GetIndexOfChildWithName(ConstString name) {
bool lldb_private::formatters::LibStdcppStringSummaryProvider(
ValueObject &valobj, Stream &stream, const TypeSummaryOptions &options) {
- const bool scalar_is_load_addr =
@@ -239,122 +240,39 @@
VectorIteratorSyntheticFrontEnd::GetIndexOfChildWithName(ConstString name) {
bool lldb_private::formatters::LibStdcppStringSummaryProvider(
ValueObject &valobj, Stream &stream, const TypeSummaryOptions &options) {
- const bool scalar_is_load_addr =
@@ -16,4 +16,4 @@ run
DavidSpickett wrote:
This needs to be done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143126
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
DavidSpickett wrote:
Ok so they aren't lying then. I suppose pecoff -> Windows and on Windows they
use minidump among other things.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143126
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
Michael137 wrote:
@ian-twilightcoder to chime in on the details again. Happy to give it a shot if
nothing breaks (I assume you tried running the API test-suite locally?)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144913
___
lldb-commits mailing list
ll
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144998
>From 22e8f644c3cd8856e1663bdf71aab4fa621f75bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 12:15:35 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb][DWARFASTParserClang] Support constant index
encodi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)
Changes
Starting with https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124790, Clang emits
`DW_AT_object_pointer` encoded as integer constants rather than DIE references.
This patch accounts for this.
---
Full diff: htt
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+//===-- NativeRegisterContextAIX.h *- C++ -*-===//
DavidSpickett wrote:
Make line 1 line up with line 7, they should be the same length.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144645
__
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+//===-- NativeRegisterContextAIX.cpp ===//
DavidSpickett wrote:
Add more `-` so that line 1 ends at the same place line 7 does.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144645
___
https://github.com/DavidSpickett approved this pull request.
Looks a lot like the existing ppc Linux class, which makes sense, same
architecture.
With the comment formatting fixed, this LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144645
___
lldb-
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+//===-- NativeRegisterContextAIX.cpp ===//
HemangGadhavi wrote:
Done Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144645
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-com
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+//===-- NativeRegisterContextAIX.h *- C++ -*-===//
HemangGadhavi wrote:
Done Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144645
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-com
DavidSpickett wrote:
Just add the new tests and this will be good to go. Figure out whether the
other plugins are lying later :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143126
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.l
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Pavel Labath (labath)
Changes
This lets get rid of platform-specific code in ProcessGDBRemote and use the
same code path (module differences in socket types) everywhere. It also unlocks
further cleanups in the debugserver launching code.
De
labath wrote:
> Another aside: Does anyone know why the [libstdc++ `std::__cxx11::string`
> summaries](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/802fa92aee3565768887615108aa3e924d4e0fc7/lldb/source/Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus/LibStdcpp.cpp#L240-L358)
> weren't using the string summary? They were
https://github.com/DhruvSrivastavaX approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144645
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -326,11 +326,15 @@ void NativeProcessFreeBSD::MonitorSIGTRAP(lldb::pid_t
pid) {
if (thread_info != m_threads_stepping_with_breakpoint.end() &&
thread_info->second == regctx.GetPC()) {
thread->SetStoppedByTrace();
- Status brkpt_error =
@@ -32,6 +32,31 @@ class RegisterValue;
class Stream;
class Target;
class UnwindPlan;
+class EmulateInstruction;
+
+using BreakpointLocations = std::vector;
+
+class SingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor {
+public:
+ SingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor(
+ std::unique_
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+"""
+Test software step-inst
+"""
+
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
+
+
+class TestSoftwareStep(TestBase):
+@skipIf(archs=no_match(re.compile("rv*")))
+def t
@@ -14471,3 +14471,14 @@ bool
EmulateInstructionARM::CreateFunctionEntryUnwind(UnwindPlan &unwind_plan) {
unwind_plan.SetReturnAddressRegister(dwarf_lr);
return true;
}
+
+unsigned ARMSingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor::GetBreakpointSize(
+lldb::addr_t bp_addr, Sta
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+"""
+Test software step-inst
+"""
+
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
+
+
+class TestSoftwareStep(TestBase):
+@skipIf(archs=no_match(re.compile("rv*")))
--
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ class NativeProcessSoftwareSingleStep {
protected:
// List of thread ids stepping with a breakpoint with the address of
// the relevan breakpoint
- std::map m_threads_stepping_with_breakpoint;
+ std::multimap m_threads_stepping_with_breakpoint;
-
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+"""
+Test software step-inst
dlav-sc wrote:
addressed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127505
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
@@ -32,6 +32,31 @@ class RegisterValue;
class Stream;
class Target;
class UnwindPlan;
+class EmulateInstruction;
+
+using BreakpointLocations = std::vector;
+
+class SingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor {
+public:
+ SingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor(
+ std::unique_
@@ -588,7 +588,100 @@
EmulateInstruction::GetInternalRegisterNumber(RegisterContext *reg_ctx,
return LLDB_INVALID_REGNUM;
}
+std::unique_ptr
+EmulateInstruction::CreateBreakpointLocationPredictor(
+std::unique_ptr emulator_up) {
+ auto creator =
+ emulator_up->Get
@@ -32,6 +32,31 @@ class RegisterValue;
class Stream;
class Target;
class UnwindPlan;
+class EmulateInstruction;
+
+using BreakpointLocations = std::vector;
+
+class SingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor {
+public:
+ SingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor(
+ std::unique_
@@ -16,6 +16,16 @@
namespace lldb_private {
+class ARMSingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor
+: public SingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor {
+public:
+ ARMSingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor(
+ std::unique_ptr emulator_up)
+ : SingleStepBreakpointLocation
@@ -326,11 +326,15 @@ void NativeProcessFreeBSD::MonitorSIGTRAP(lldb::pid_t
pid) {
if (thread_info != m_threads_stepping_with_breakpoint.end() &&
thread_info->second == regctx.GetPC()) {
thread->SetStoppedByTrace();
- Status brkpt_error =
@@ -87,34 +87,10 @@ static size_t WriteMemoryCallback(EmulateInstruction
*instruction, void *baton,
return length;
}
-static lldb::addr_t ReadFlags(NativeRegisterContext ®siter_context) {
- const RegisterInfo *flags_info = regsiter_context.GetRegisterInfo(
- eRegister
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+"""
+Test software step-inst
+"""
+
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
+
+
+class TestSoftwareStep(TestBase):
+@skipIf(archs=no_match(re.compile("rv*")))
+def t
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+"""
+Test software step-inst
+"""
+
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
+
+
+class TestSoftwareStep(TestBase):
+@skipIf(archs=no_match(re.compile("rv*")))
+def t
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+"""
+Test software step-inst
+"""
+
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
+
+
+class TestSoftwareStep(TestBase):
+@skipIf(archs=no_match(re.compile("rv*")))
+def t
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+CXX_SOURCES := main.cpp
+
+CXXFLAGS_EXTRAS := -std=c++14 -O0
Nerixyz wrote:
Yes, that worked!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143177
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -16,6 +16,16 @@
namespace lldb_private {
+class ARMSingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor
+: public SingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor {
+public:
+ ARMSingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor(
+ std::unique_ptr emulator_up)
+ : SingleStepBreakpointLocation
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: David Spickett (DavidSpickett)
Changes
This controls whether tag checking is performed for loads and
stores, or stores only.
It requires a specific architecture feature which we detect
with a HWCAP3 and cpuinfo feature.
Live process tests
@@ -299,6 +299,8 @@ def parseOptionsAndInitTestdirs():
configuration.libcxx_library_dir = args.libcxx_library_dir
configuration.cmake_build_type = args.cmake_build_type.lower()
+configuration.target_triple = args.target_triple
+
Nerixyz wrote:
The
https://github.com/Nerixyz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143177
>From 9f957946e2538c8a0c0f6d772ae9c5d1946ec694 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nerixyz
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 21:49:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [LLDB] Add type summaries for MSVC STL strings
---
.../lldb/DataForm
@@ -299,6 +299,8 @@ def parseOptionsAndInitTestdirs():
configuration.libcxx_library_dir = args.libcxx_library_dir
configuration.cmake_build_type = args.cmake_build_type.lower()
+configuration.target_triple = args.target_triple
+
labath wrote:
I'd
https://github.com/dlav-sc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127505
>From 2520b8d7884d320ed7923685b1a3e8652a7e8f5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniil Avdeev
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 13:27:46 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb][RISCV] handle lr/sc single step
lldb-server had limi
https://github.com/Nerixyz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143177
>From d80694278209cfc1c88414b1f5eb8e9980ebb3fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nerixyz
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 21:49:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [LLDB] Add type summaries for MSVC STL strings
---
.../lldb/DataForm
https://github.com/DavidSpickett created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145033
This controls whether tag checking is performed for loads and
stores, or stores only.
It requires a specific architecture feature which we detect
with a HWCAP3 and cpuinfo feature.
Live process tests loo
https://github.com/charles-zablit updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144731
>From 3c9a3e5e9af0c9d58783c11490bda473ada84ef3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Zablit
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 16:41:40 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] [lldb] upgrade HandleFrameFormatVariable callees t
DavidSpickett wrote:
And if you want to test this, you need Arm's FVP and to add the following
shrinkwrap settings:
```
+-C cluster0.memory_tagging_support_level: 4
+-C cluster1.memory_tagging_support_level: 4
+-C bp.dram_metadata.is_enabled: 1
```
I did this on top of the v9.5-a con
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: David Spickett (DavidSpickett)
Changes
This will be used to detect the presence of Arm's new Memory Tagging store only
checking feature. This commit just adds the plumbing to get that value into the
detection function.
FreeBSD has not all
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r HEAD~1...HEAD
lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/gdbclientutils.py
lldb/test/API/functio
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: None (eleviant)
Changes
Patch fixes the sync-on-timeout logic in lldb and switches to qEcho based ping,
instead of qC. This fixes vRun message case, when there is no process yet and
qC returns an error.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/l
https://github.com/eleviant updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145072
>From 8436977c0331765ab17dbb47cd7113352642e575 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Evgeny Leviant
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 18:46:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Fix qEcho message handling
Patch fixes the sync-on
https://github.com/maryammo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142480
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/da-viper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143126
>From fc849bd4e831f9dc6f53be3a8508e1eb33f4151c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ebuka Ezike
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:15:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [lldb] add plugin names to process save-core error
output.
s
https://github.com/eleviant created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145072
Patch fixes the sync-on-timeout logic in lldb and switches to qEcho based ping,
instead of qC. This fixes vRun message case, when there is no process yet and
qC returns an error.
>From 8436977c0331765ab17dbb4
https://github.com/dlav-sc updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127505
>From 2520b8d7884d320ed7923685b1a3e8652a7e8f5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniil Avdeev
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 13:27:46 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [lldb][RISCV] handle lr/sc single step
lldb-server had limi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Michael Buch (Michael137)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#144880
Caused `TestObjCIvarsInBlocks.py` to fail on macOS CI.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145065.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/source/Pl
https://github.com/cmtice created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145055
As a preliminary to making DIL the default implementation for 'frame var', ran
check-lldb forcing 'frame var' to always use DIL, and discovered a few failing
tests. This fixes most of them. The only two remainin
@@ -16,4 +16,4 @@ run
da-viper wrote:
did not run it with a file since that is tested in the `TestProcessSaveCore.py`
file.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143126
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commit
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: Python code formatter, darker found issues in your code. :warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
darker --check --diff -r HEAD~1...HEAD
lldb/test/API/functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-stl/msvcstl/stri
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp,h --
llvm/include/llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFExpressionPr
https://github.com/cmtice updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145055
>From e9079e6357b933e84603997edb8d0cd27a515989 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caroline Tice
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:33:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [LLDB] Update DIL to pass current 'frame var' tests.
As a pr
https://github.com/cmtice updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145055
>From e9079e6357b933e84603997edb8d0cd27a515989 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caroline Tice
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:33:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [LLDB] Update DIL to pass current 'frame var' tests.
As a pr
@@ -74,24 +74,48 @@ struct DemangledNameInfo {
return BasenameRange.second > BasenameRange.first;
}
+ /// Returns \c true if `BasenameRange` is empty.
+ bool isBasenameEmpty() const {
+return BasenameRange.first == BasenameRange.second;
Michael137
https://github.com/JDevlieghere edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145015
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -52,6 +52,34 @@ TCPSocket::TCPSocket(NativeSocket socket, bool should_close)
TCPSocket::~TCPSocket() { CloseListenSockets(); }
+llvm::Expected<
+std::pair, std::unique_ptr>>
+TCPSocket::CreatePair() {
+ auto listen_socket_up = std::make_unique(true);
+ if (Status err
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145015
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -106,6 +106,10 @@ class Socket : public IOObject {
static std::unique_ptr Create(const SocketProtocol protocol,
Status &error);
+ static llvm::Expected<
+ std::pair, std::unique_ptr>>
JDevlieghere wrote:
Nit:
https://github.com/zyn-li updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144815
>From 16792f7dffae9ef95a3a09c2dbaa6731b07e0ea7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhiyuan Li
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 16:49:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb] Fix SBMemoryRegionInfoListExtensions iter to yield
uniqu
jyknight wrote:
> Thanks for the concrete example! [..]
I just wanted to thank you (a bit late) for the explanation above, it was
really helpful!
> FWIW I'd like to get rid of the reference count of DiagnosticsEngine too, and
> make the lifetimes stricter and more explicit, but that's a lower
https://github.com/Michael137 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145065
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144998
>From 22e8f644c3cd8856e1663bdf71aab4fa621f75bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 12:15:35 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [lldb][DWARFASTParserClang] Support constant index
encodi
DavidSpickett wrote:
Depending on the user's knowledge of / interpretation of how signals work, I
don't think "sent by kernel" is enough for them to find their specific problem.
Asking my nearest totally accurate AI model:
> Yes, when an application receives a SIGILL (illegal instruction) signa
medismailben wrote:
Cool stuff!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144543
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2025-06-20T10:48:04-05:00
New Revision: 9524bfb27020d31b9474f595b7c0e5d2e1ac65f5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9524bfb27020d31b9474f595b7c0e5d2e1ac65f5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9524bfb27020d31b9474f595b7c0e5d2e1ac65f5.d
https://github.com/DavidSpickett updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145029
>From ba8fcf4ef14e25b8a628b994988d6a67bdbea7df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Spickett
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 10:43:48 +
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb][AArch64] Add HWCAP3 to register field detection
T
https://github.com/JDevlieghere closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143628
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -32,6 +34,37 @@ class RegisterValue;
class Stream;
class Target;
class UnwindPlan;
+class EmulateInstruction;
+
+using BreakpointLocations = std::vector;
+
+class SingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor {
+public:
+ SingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor(
+ std::unique_
@@ -1792,4 +1778,127 @@ bool EmulateInstructionRISCV::SupportsThisArch(const
ArchSpec &arch) {
return arch.GetTriple().isRISCV();
}
+BreakpointLocations
+RISCVSingleStepBreakpointLocationsPredictor::GetBreakpointLocations(
+Status &status) {
+ EmulateInstructionRISCV *
https://github.com/Sterling-Augustine created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145081
This is the culmination of a series of changes described in [1].
Although somewhat large by line count, it is almost entirely mechanical,
creating a new library in DebugInfo/DWARF/LowLevel. This
Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2025-06-20T10:54:00-05:00
New Revision: 749e4a53d252e23e870d4a1638ff9d846af58e7f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/749e4a53d252e23e870d4a1638ff9d846af58e7f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/749e4a53d252e23e870d4a1638ff9d846af58e7f.d
DavidSpickett wrote:
HWCAP3 has been present for a while -
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16-rc2/source/include/uapi/linux/auxvec.h#L35
The MTE patches are still in review
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250611150417.44850-5-yeoreum@arm.com/)
but are unlikely to change dr
https://github.com/DavidSpickett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145029
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
charles-zablit wrote:
I only get one test failures when running the `check-lldb-api` target:
`commands/platform/sdk/TestPlatformSDK.py` but it also happens on the main
branch, so there's probably something wrong with the SDK configuration on my
system.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pul
labath wrote:
Well.. IIUC, this test tries to attach to a process called "a.out" -- and hopes
that the process doesn't appear. If you run the test suite in parallel, you'll
have any number of processes like that going around all the time. Not only will
this test fail, but it will mess up the s
Author: Hemang Gadhavi
Date: 2025-06-20T20:18:39+05:30
New Revision: 20d57e77f6709ef32791391bc064d3ed5663272a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20d57e77f6709ef32791391bc064d3ed5663272a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20d57e77f6709ef32791391bc064d3ed5663272a.diff
Author: Maryam Moghadas
Date: 2025-06-20T13:03:14-04:00
New Revision: 65cb3bcf327da8f9740e56897bc9954364e59eb6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/65cb3bcf327da8f9740e56897bc9954364e59eb6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/65cb3bcf327da8f9740e56897bc9954364e59eb6.dif
https://github.com/zyn-li updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144815
>From 2054114501b9de9ab54d22044800607fd12d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhiyuan Li
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 16:49:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Fix SBMemoryRegionInfoListExtensions iter to yield
unique re
https://github.com/chelcassanova approved this pull request.
LGTM!
(For future reference, we should also do this when we run the framework fixup
Python script)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144217
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commit
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
