slydiman wrote:
Here is the log of lldb-server processes (parent and child) on remote Linux
```
/home/ubuntu/lldb-server p --log-channels lldb all --listen *:1234 --server
--min-gdbserver-port 1236 --max-gdbserver-port 1240
/home/ubuntu/lldb-server gdbserver tcp://[10.1.1.170]:0 --native-regs --
Michael137 wrote:
@jimingham @JDevlieghere @clayborg just to confirm, are you still ok with me
landing this and address the question of a common `CLanguageRuntime` plugin as
a follow-up?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80368
___
lldb-commi
https://github.com/temyurchenko created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98795
Relanding of #93913. Now, it also fixes incorrect declaration context in
function parameters creation.
>From 410c7ba9fb7667dabdfbc48fdbda427401ca8df0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artem Yurchenko <44875844
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: None (temyurchenko)
Changes
Relanding of #93913. Now, it also fixes incorrect declaration context
in function parameters creation.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98795.diff
7 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/
https://github.com/temyurchenko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98795
>From 410c7ba9fb7667dabdfbc48fdbda427401ca8df0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artem Yurchenko <44875844+temyurche...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 16:18:47 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang
temyurchenko wrote:
@AaronBallman could you please review?
I've fixed at least the LLDB tests. There was an actual bug in function
parameters construction that was revealed by the invariant check.
However, I can't run the whole LLDB suite. Even among the reported failing
tests, some are «un
