abidh accepted this revision.
abidh added a comment.
Looks good.
Comment at: packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-mi/main.cpp:22
{
-int a = 10;
+int a = 10;
+
This declaration looks redundant.
Comment at: tools/lldb-mi/MICmdCmd
Author: hhellyer
Date: Tue Jan 3 05:03:14 2017
New Revision: 290874
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=290874&view=rev
Log:
Simplify reading of Linux notes to correctly handle endianess.
Summary:
This patch changes and simplifies the way notes are read from Linux Elf cores.
The current
Author: labath
Date: Tue Jan 3 07:18:12 2017
New Revision: 290890
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=290890&view=rev
Log:
Fix-up TestLinuxCore for r290874
r290874 enabled the s390x test, which caused the rest of the tests to start
misbehaving. This is because this test switches the sel
tberghammer created this revision.
tberghammer added a reviewer: labath.
tberghammer added a subscriber: lldb-commits.
Improve the performance of jModulesInfo in lldb-server
Previously it parsed /proc//maps for every module separately
resulting in a very slow response time. This CL add some cachi
tberghammer abandoned this revision.
tberghammer added a comment.
Based on the feedback will try to fix the Clang AS importer instead (don't have
any ETA for it)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27394
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.
labath accepted this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Looks great, thanks.
Do you have any measurements on the real impact this makes on jModulesInfo
packet?
Comment at: source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeProcessLinux.cpp:1757
tberghammer marked an inline comment as done.
tberghammer added a comment.
On some extremely large cases I seen the response time to fell from ~120s to
~8s (default packet timeout is 2s).
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28233
___
lldb-commits mailing lis
Author: tberghammer
Date: Tue Jan 3 10:29:43 2017
New Revision: 290895
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=290895&view=rev
Log:
Improve the performance of jModulesInfo in lldb-server
Previously it parsed /proc//maps for every module separately
resulting in a very slow response time. Thi
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL290895: Improve the performance of jModulesInfo in
lldb-server (authored by tberghammer).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28233?vs=82884&id=82897#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://r
Hi Michal,
It looks like this patch may have broken this bot.
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/lldb_build_test/23767/consoleFull#-1083450927b825e790-484f-4586-af29-73c4754ff671
What do you think?
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 10:31 AM Michal Gorny via lldb-commits <
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote
I bet it's the Xcode build not replicating the
if (LLVM_ENABLE_DIA_SDK)
add_subdirectory(PDB)
endif()
and trying to run the PDB test even though it shouldn't.
(I don't really have a good idea on how to fix this.)
pl
On 3 January 2017 at 17:36, Zachary Turner via lldb-commits
wrote:
> Hi Micha
It may also be the addition of a source file not being added to the Xcode
project. This is currently handled by manual changes to the xcodeproj.
-Tim
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-commits <
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I bet it's the Xcode build not replicating
Author: jmolenda
Date: Tue Jan 3 18:01:25 2017
New Revision: 290917
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=290917&view=rev
Log:
Remove SymbolFilePDBTests.cpp from the list of tests to include in the
lldb-gtest binary that xcode builds for -scheme lldb-gtest; these tests
won't run on macosx
Author: cbieneman
Date: Tue Jan 3 21:36:35 2017
New Revision: 290934
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=290934&view=rev
Log:
[CMake] Fix install rules for tools included in the framework
The logic for install rules was wrong for tools included in the framework if
the framework build i
nitesh.jain updated this revision to Diff 83012.
nitesh.jain added a comment.
Update diff as per suggestion.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27088
Files:
include/lldb/API/SBDwarf.h
packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py
packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server/TestLldbGdbServer.py
nitesh.jain added a comment.
Instead of creating header SBDwarf.h, is it possible that python can reuse llvm
Dwarf.h ?
Thanks
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27088
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/m
16 matches
Mail list logo
