Yeah, sorry about that, I wrote that message in a hurry.
This was a generic issue with expressions in backticks (``) concerning the
printing of pointers (or even integers, as I later found out) of different
sizes. Basically a 64-bit pointer would get printed as a decimal value, but
a 32-bit one in
Author: labath
Date: Fri Sep 2 04:25:42 2016
New Revision: 280477
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=280477&view=rev
Log:
Bump up TestCallWithTimeout timeout
Still a bit flaky on remote targets. Trying a larger bump this time. :/
Modified:
lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/tes
Author: labath
Date: Fri Sep 2 04:25:36 2016
New Revision: 280476
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=280476&view=rev
Log:
Make Scalar::GetValue more consistent
Summary:
It seems the original intention of the function was printing signed values in
decimal format, and
unsigned values in
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL280476: Make Scalar::GetValue more consistent (authored by
labath).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24126?vs=69979&id=70140#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24126
labath added inline comments.
Comment at: lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/Process/minidump/MinidumpParser.cpp:146
@@ +145,3 @@
+break;
+}
+
You have a "enumeration not handled in a switch" warning here. Could you do
something about that?
Repository:
Author: labath
Date: Fri Sep 2 04:52:18 2016
New Revision: 280478
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=280478&view=rev
Log:
Revert "Make Scalar::GetValue more consistent"
This reverts commit r280476 as it breaks several tests on i386. I was fixing an
32-bit
breakage, and I did not run t
Author: labath
Date: Fri Sep 2 05:58:52 2016
New Revision: 280480
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=280480&view=rev
Log:
Reapply "Make Scalar::GetValue more consistent"
this is a resubmission of r280476. The problem with the original commit was
that it was printing
out all numbers as
dvlahovski added inline comments.
Comment at: lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/Process/minidump/MinidumpParser.cpp:146
@@ +145,3 @@
+break;
+}
+
labath wrote:
> You have a "enumeration not handled in a switch" warning here. Could you do
> something about
Author: tberghammer
Date: Fri Sep 2 10:52:19 2016
New Revision: 280490
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=280490&view=rev
Log:
Fix 2 waring in the OCaml AST context
Modified:
lldb/trunk/include/lldb/Symbol/OCamlASTContext.h
lldb/trunk/source/Symbol/OCamlASTContext.cpp
Modified
Author: tberghammer
Date: Fri Sep 2 10:56:33 2016
New Revision: 280492
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=280492&view=rev
Log:
Fix build breakage caused by r280490
Modified:
lldb/trunk/source/Symbol/OCamlASTContext.cpp
Modified: lldb/trunk/source/Symbol/OCamlASTContext.cpp
URL:
h
Hello everyone,
LLVM buildmaster will be updated and restarted after 6 PM Pacific time
today.
Thanks
Galina
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
Author: enrico
Date: Fri Sep 2 13:15:48 2016
New Revision: 280513
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=280513&view=rev
Log:
Check for null
Modified:
lldb/trunk/source/Core/ValueObject.cpp
Modified: lldb/trunk/source/Core/ValueObject.cpp
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lld
SVN mirror in the LLVM Lab is behind the master SVN. This affects the build
bots.
I'm looking in to this.
Thanks
Galina
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
edmunoz created this revision.
edmunoz added a reviewer: ki.stfu.
edmunoz added a subscriber: lldb-commits.
edmunoz set the repository for this revision to rL LLVM.
edmunoz added a project: LLDB.
Herald added a subscriber: ki.stfu.
When extracting options for long options (starting with "--"), the
edmunoz added inline comments.
Comment at: tools/lldb-mi/MICmdArgValOptionLong.cpp:190
@@ -189,10 +189,3 @@
{
-CMIUtilString::VecString_t vecOptions;
-MIuint nOptionsPresent = 0;
-if ((m_eExpectingOptionType != eArgValType_StringQuoted) &&
(m_eExpectingOptionType !=
mgorny added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D23882#527682, @ki.stfu wrote:
> lgtm if tests are passed
I can't say tests pass for me right now, but the results (failures, errors and
unexpected passes) are the same with and without the patch.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23882
Hello everyone,
The issue with the SVN mirror in the Lab has been resolved.
Please let me know if anything seems wrong with the builders.
Thank you for understanding.
Thanks
Galina
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists
17 matches
Mail list logo
