* Joseph Myers:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> There are also some xtests that require root privileges, such as
>> nptl/tst-setuid1. Building and testing as root is supported (but
>
> That looks like it ought to become a test using user namespaces (and so
> not an xtest).
Can
syscall_get_arch() is required to be implemented on all architectures
in addition to already implemented syscall_get_nr(),
syscall_get_arguments(), syscall_get_error(), and
syscall_get_return_value() functions in order to extend the generic
ptrace API with PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO request.
Acked-by
These should never have been defined in the arch tree to begin with, and
now uapi/linux/audit.h header is going to use EM_ARCOMPACT and EM_ARCV2
in order to define AUDIT_ARCH_ARCOMPACT and AUDIT_ARCH_ARCV2 which are
needed to implement syscall_get_arch() which in turn is required to
extend the gene
This argument is required to extend the generic ptrace API with
PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO request: syscall_get_arch() is going
to be called from ptrace_request() along with syscall_get_nr(),
syscall_get_arguments(), syscall_get_error(), and
syscall_get_return_value() functions with a tracee as their
On 12/28/18 8:44 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> Add information about ActionPointis number and supported set
> of targets (minimum / full).
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugeniy Paltsev
> ---
> arch/arc/include/asm/arcregs.h | 8 +++
> arch/arc/kernel/setup.c| 53
> +
On 1/9/19 9:35 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> + cpu->extn.ap_full = !ap.min;
This needs to be
+ cpu->extn.ap_full = !!ap.min;
___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/lis
On 12/21/18 4:05 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> Thing is ARC signal return depends on a restorer. Meaning !SA_RESTORER
>> doesn't
>> effectively exist (between libc and kernel). We currently honor user provided
>> value, instead we could simply overwrite it with default_rt_restorer and on
>> th
