On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> You mentioned the abstract deadline -- do you think Linaro has anything
>> to actually talk about in the "submit a presentation" sense here?
>
> Maybe you could give a lightning talk on the validat
In general the product should move forward and drop work-arounds like
-mimplicit-it. We (the greater ARM community) should fix these
package problems as they are found. Here's a bunch of quick-fire
statements:
* Qt is currently broken on ARM multiprocessor systems
* Qt provides a QAtomic class
Here's my summary based on these emails and the Monday call:
https://wiki.linaro.org/MichaelHope/Sandbox/GCC46Hosting
They're the same on the technical side, Launchpad wins on the release
side, and SVN wins on the community side.
There's two open questions:
1. How easy is it to frequently merge
On 11/16/2010 7:35 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> Andrew, could you look into (2) please? We need to have an
> authoritative answer from the GCC overseers or to assume 'no'.
GCC policy is simple: you can host any branch you want in GCC SVN, so
long as all the code is assigned to the FSF.
--
Mark Mi
