PenghaiZhang commented on issue #7362:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/7362#issuecomment-1696914036
Is there any example about how to use Query instead of Filter, especially
around the use of method `getDocIdSet` ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
thomasdc opened a new pull request, #12525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12525
`WordDelimiterGraphFilter` already contains support for the
`IGNORE_KEYWORDS` flag. This commits enables propagating that flag from the
`WordDelimiterGraphFilterFactory`.
Fixes https://github
benwtrent merged PR #12518:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12518
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.a
mkhludnev commented on issue #7362:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/7362#issuecomment-1697367875
> Is there any example about how to use Query instead of Filter, especially
around the use of method `getDocIdSet` ?
Hi, @PenghaiZhang .
DocIdSet just let to iterate doc i
mikemccand commented on issue #7820:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/7820#issuecomment-1697605932
Thanks @SevenCss. We may never know what got your index into this state,
unless it happens again.
Let's focus this issue on improving `CheckIndex` to detect and correct (wit
jpountz commented on PR #12526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12526#issuecomment-1698177593
Here are results on `wikimedium10m`. `OrHighHigh` and `OrHighMed` don't get
a speedup because their minimum competitive scores compute pretty quickly
anyway, but `OrHighHigh` sees a majo
jpountz opened a new pull request, #12526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12526
Currently, our dynamic pruning logic for disjunctions updates the minimum
competitive score as it sees more and more competitive hits. However this
process can take time if some of the high-scoring c
jpountz commented on PR #12489:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12489#issuecomment-1698178694
> So it takes much longer for dynamic pruning to start helping
significantly. I suspect we have room for improvement to better deal with this
sort of scenario.
I opened https://gi
PenghaiZhang commented on issue #7362:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/7362#issuecomment-1698275146
>
Hi @mkhludnev thanks for you quick response!! Actually my product had been
using Lucene v3.6.2 for over a decade. I managed to upgrade it to v4 on last
week, and now I
PenghaiZhang commented on issue #8600:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/8600#issuecomment-1698315841
I have checked the change log and migration guide for v5.5.5, but I cannot
find any info about `FieldCacheRangeFilter`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser
jainankitk opened a new issue, #12527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12527
### Description
While recently [working on numeric range
queries](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/issues/9541), I
noticed readInts24 to be consuming significant CPU cycles. When
PenghaiZhang commented on issue #7350:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/7350#issuecomment-1698334404
Same question - this one is neither mentioned in the migration guide nor the
change log list. Can someone please give some advice ?
--
This is an automated message from the Ap
12 matches
Mail list logo