Forward my + 1 from linkis@dev (non-binding)
Chen Xia
wangxiaogang 于2022年4月6日周三 12:24写道：
>
> There was a small error in the first email, the second email was corrected:
>
> "Hello Linkis Community," --> "Hello Incubator Community,"
>
> Lidong Dai 于2022年4月5日周二 23:05写道：
> >
> > by the way, I not
Copy my +1 from dev@linkis (non-binding)
Best Regards!
Chen Xia
peacewong 于2022年5月11日周三 15:13写道：
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Linkis(Incubating) version
> 1.1.1-RC1
>
> The Apache Linkis community has voted on and approved a proposal to
>
> Hi Justin
>
> I confirmed in the py4j-0.10.7-src.zip file, and the backport.py file
> clearly states that it is all licensed under the PSF License.
>
> So can it be considered that py4j-0.10.7-src.zip is licensed under
> BDS license, except that backport.py is under PSF license
>
> In this c
Hi Justin
I also find that other projects also have this issue such as spark[1] ,
flink[2] and so on.
Is it necessary to start a new thread email to discuss this?
Looking forward to your further reply.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/python/lib/py4j-0.10.9.5-src.zip
[2]
https://g
Hi Justin
We found that the new version of py4j has removed the backport.py file, so
after our evaluation, we upgraded the py4j version to
py4j-0.10.7-src.zip[1].
But the py file is still missing license headers and have different
authors[2]. We don't know how to solve this problem.
[1] https://
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your reminder,
About "how contributions to the project are licensed",I found some
useful information:
According to py4j CONTRIBUTING.rst[1]:
"Py4J does not have an official Contributor License Agreement (CLA),
but it is assumed that as soon as you make a contribution (patc
Hi:
I notice There is a minor issue with the MXNet website,
some check type not pass the website check here:
https://whimsy.apache.org/pods/project/mxnet
Best Regards!
Chen Xia
Gordon 于2022年6月3日周五 13:09写道：
> +1 binding
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2022, 9:22 PM Mingshen Sun wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-bin
+1(non-binding)
I have checked:
[OK] Download links are valid.
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[OK] There are LICENSE and NOTICE files.
[OK] There is a DISCLAIMER file.
[OK] The year in the NOTICE file is correct.
[OK] All text files have ASF license.
[OK] No unlicensed compiled arch
Thank Justin for your very careful check.
We did use the ASF license header incorrectly[1]. We will fix it to the
right "New BSD" license and state it in the LICENSE file.
We contacted the committer of the util directory code file to confirm that
the license is correct. For the dom.js file [2]
Hi Justin
Thanks for your advice.
I have modified the README.md [1] to optimize the points you mentioned.
Best Regards!
Chen Xia
1 https://github.com/apache/incubator-linkis/blob/master/README.md
Justin Mclean 于2022年6月30日周四 11:26写道：
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in nam
Forward my +1 from dev@linkis (non-binding)
Best Regards!
Chen Xia
ShaoFeng Shi 于2022年7月26日周二 22:46写道：
> +1 (binding)
>
> Looks good to me, I checked:
> - the signature is by IPMC
> - the sha hash is good
> - LICENSE and NOTICE are there
> - 'mvn clean install' success
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sh
+1 (non-binding)
I checked
[YES] release files in correct location
[YES] release files have the word incubating in their name
[YES] the digital signature and hashes correct
[YES] DISCLAIMER file exist
[YES] LICENSE and NOTICE files exists
[YES] the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct
[YES] the NOTICE
+1 (non-binding)
I checked
[YES] release files in correct location
[YES] release files have the word incubating in their name
[YES] the digital signature and hashes correct
[YES] DISCLAIMER-WIP file exist
[YES] LICENSE and NOTICE files exists
[YES] the NOTICE year correct
By the way, I see some
+1 non-binding I checked:
Incubating in name
Verified signature and checksum
LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
DISCLAIMER file exist
NOTICE year correct
All files have license headers if necessary.
By the way, as some IPMC suggested before[1], it's suggested not to use
`Binding Vote` and `Non Binding` o
+1 (non-binding)
I checked
[YES] release files have the word incubating in their name
[YES] the digital signature and hashes correct
[YES] DISCLAIMER-WIP file exists
[YES] LICENSE and NOTICE files exist
[YES] the NOTICE year correct
I notice devlake has multiple releases under the dist/release ar
Forward my +1 (non-binding) from dev@linkis
Best Regards!
Chen Xia
俊平堵 于2022年9月3日周六 09:09写道：
> +1 binding.
>
> I checked:
> - Download links are valid.
> - The checksums and signatures are correct. - LICENSE and NOTICE files look
> good. - DISCLAIMER in place.
> - community vote result is va
+1(non-binding)
I checked:
1. All download links are valid
2. Checksum and signature are OK
3. LICENSE and NOTICE are existed
I personally think the mail thread view url page presented by pony mail is
better, as you used in the dev vote results[1]
Need to pay attention, PPMC members have formal
+1(non-binding)
I checked:
1. All download links are valid
2. Checksum and signature are OK
3. LICENSE and NOTICE are existed
I try to svn co from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/heron/heron-0.20.5-incubating-rc4/
The entire file size is nearly 3591 MB, It takes a certain amou
We applied for the Docker Hub permission before[1], but the feedback
Docker Hub is out of seats.
It is recommended to use the Github Docker Registry.
Does this meet the ASF docker image distribution requirements (The
official website document[2]
mentions:artifacts need to be placed in
https://hub.d
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards!
Chen Xia
Sunil Govindan 于2022年10月13日周四 08:24写道：
>
> +1 binding
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 2:43 PM Weiwei Yang wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> > Good luck!!
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:13 PM Felix Cheung
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > >
> > >
+1 non-binding
Best Regards!
Chen Xia
Yu Xiao 于2022年10月14日周五 10:33写道：
>
> + 1 ，about add PPMC~
>
> Best wishes!
>
> Yu Xiao
> Apache ShenYu
>
> Austin Bennett 于2022年10月14日周五 10:24写道：
> >
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > Out of curiosity: is there a specific motivation for the change for the
> > in
+1(non-binding)
I checked:
[YES] All download links are valid
[YES] Checksum and signature are OK
[YES] LICENSE and NOTICE are existed
It is recommended to use this address[1] as the download URL of the KEYS
file
I notice Pegasus project has multiple releases under the dist/release
area[2].
Old
+1 (non-binding)
[YES] Download links are valid.
[YES] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[YES] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current release.
[YES] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each repo.
[YES] All files have license headers if necessary.
[YES] No unli
23 matches
Mail list logo
