Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find
some details below.
In master-aarch64, after:
| commit gcc-16-1550-g9244ea4bf556
| Author: Andrew MacLeod
| Date: Mon Jun 16 15:41:47 2025 -0400
|
| Snap subrange boundries to bitma
Regressions on master at commit r16-1566 vs commit r16-1560 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: g++.dg/coroutines/torture/func-params-07.C -O2 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/coroutines/torture/func-params-07.C -O2 execution test
Regressions on master at commit r16-1565 vs commit r16-1559 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test
New passes:
FAIL: g++.dg/coroutines/torture/func-params-07.C -O2 execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/coroutines/torture/func-params-07.C -O2 executio
Regressions on master at commit r16-1567 vs commit r16-1565 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test
Could you file a glibc bug for this please? It needs some analysis to
see if it's an FP or not.
There's actually a suppression for -Os already there:
if (elem < table_size)
{
/* Compare the byte sequence but
