Regressions on master at commit r15-9072 vs commit r15-9069 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find
some details below.
In gcc_check master-aarch64, after:
| commit gcc-15-9063-gf3899e0fd3f
| Author: Tobias Burnus
| Date: Mon Mar 31 11:44:26 2025 +0200
|
| OpenMP: modify_call_for_o
Regressions on master at commit r15-9117 vs commit r15-9112 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr119473.c scan-assembler-not \\(%r26\\),
New passes:
Regressions on master at commit r15-9064 vs commit r15-9060 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/append-args-1.c (internal compiler error: in
modify_call_for_omp_dispatch, at gimplify.cc:3957)
FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/append-args-1.c (internal compiler error: in
modify_call_for_om
Regressions on master at commit r15-9059 vs commit r15-9050 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc -std=gnu++17 execution test
New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 at 12:59, Sam James via Gcc-regression
wrote:
>
> ci_not...@linaro.org writes:
>
> > Dear contributor,
> >
> > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please
> > find some details below.
> >
> > In gcc_check master-aarch64, after:
> > | commit gcc-1
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-9479 vs commit r13-9451 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O0 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-3.c -O0 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-3.c -O2 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c+
Regressions on master at commit r15-9064 vs commit r15-9061 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/append-args-1.c (internal compiler error: in
modify_call_for_omp_dispatch, at gimplify.cc:3957)
FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/append-args-1.c (internal compiler error: in
modify_call_for_om
Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11483 vs commit r14-11478 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/bitfield_race.c -O2 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/mutexset1.c -O2 output pattern test
FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/pr65400-1.c -O0 output pattern test
FAIL
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 at 17:49, Sam James via Gcc-regression
wrote:
>
> ci_not...@linaro.org writes:
>
> > Dear contributor,
> >
> > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please
> > find some details below.
> >
> > In arm-eabi cortex-m33 hard, after:
> > | commit gcc-
10 matches
Mail list logo