Ported from svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/ARM/embedded-4_9-branch
* config.gcc (--with-multilib-list): Accept arm embedded cores.
* configure.ac (with_multilib_list): Export for being used in arm
embedded multilib fragment.
* configure: Regenerated.
* Makefile.in (with_multilib_list):
Hello Ramana!
> Thank you for your patch - In this case before you make any more
> changes to this patch - comparing your patch and Terry's patch here
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00729.html shows no real
> differences
As I wrote in the patch, it is a port from the embedded-4_9-
Hello Ramana!
> There are usually features on the embedded-X_X-branch used to create
> releases that may not be on an FSF release branch.
Not on the embedded-5 branch and as far as I analysed it, all changes of
embedded-4.9 branch are now at Trunk.
>> I would like to ask if you have a copyright
Hello Ramana and Tejas!
The patch is originally from Terry Guo
(see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00729.html).
SVN commit r210320 on
svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/ARM/embedded-4_9-branch .
The original was using "with_multilib_list" instead of TM_MULTILIB_CONFIG.
Moreover, i
Hello !
Did rebase the patch (sent at 11/08/2015 01:24 AM) to latest trunk
(335ce86cb6cea8046993ab93d573316fd9ff798c).
The patch is originally from Terry Guo
(see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00729.html).
SVN commit r210320 on
svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/ARM/embedded-4_9-
Ping!
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg01578.html
On 05/19/2016 11:42 PM, Jasmin J. wrote:
Hi!
Ping!
Attached is a rebased version of my patch due to commit
33ac16c8cc870229a6a08cd7037275b01e7a0b9d
*** gcc/ChangeLog ***
2016-04-19 Thomas Preud'homme
J
Hi!
I would really like to see this in GCC, because this is the base for the
next patch "Add multilib support for bare-metal ARM architectures".
BR
Jasmin
*
On 04/27/2016 04:17 PM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
Ping?
Best rega
my new version of this patch.
This is still a requirement.
BR
Jasmin
***
On 03/04/2016 01:19 AM, Jasmin J. wrote:
Hi all!
As to the need to modify Makefile.in and
configure.ac, this is because the patch aims to let control
/2016 01:19 AM, Jasmin J. wrote:
Hi all!
As to the need to modify Makefile.in and
configure.ac, this is because the patch aims to let control to the user
as to what multilib should be built.
As Ramana asked in his answer to my first version of the patch: Why?
The GCC mechanism to forward this to
