Hi,
When building gdbserver with -fsanitize=thread (added to CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS) we
run into:
...
ld: ../libiberty/libiberty.a(safe-ctype.o): warning: relocation against \
`__tsan_init' in read-only section `.text'
ld: ../libiberty/libiberty.a(safe-ctype.o): relocation R_X86_64_PC32 \
against sym
When amending the allowed alignment size to accommodate the larger values
permitted by newer tools, we retained the object file limit of 2^15 for
Darwin versions <= 10, since that is what the native tools expect there.
This triggers a different diagnostic path with a distinct error message,
which
David: PING
On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 22:45 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Also, the test gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-asm.cc fails and would need
> this line:
>
> #include
>
> Is this okay if I add it in this patch?
>
> On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 22:13 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > Hi.
> > The attache
Per Martin's request. These were deprecated years ago, but not removed
in a timely manner.
I didn't remove any bits in runtimes where the canonical repository is
elsewhere. Similarly I didn't remove any of the bits from config.guess
and config.sub which we get from gnu-config.
I did a san
This is 99.99% Aldy's work. My only real contribution was twiddling one
MIPS specific test in response to a regression after adding this patch
to my tester.
In simplest terms, this patch converts DOM to use the Ranger
infrastructure rather than the EVRP infrastructure. I'd basically
approve
Hello,
I referenced kind, nthread, and implicit as pointers in my last patch.
This patch fixes this bug. We review patches and even the committed ones.
Another thing, I didn't add gompd_thread_handle_access entries in the
ChangeLog.
libgomp/ChangeLog
2022-06-26 MohamedAtef
* ompd-helper.c (
On Linux/x86_64,
8c99e307b20c502e55c425897fb3884ba8f05882 is the first bad commit
commit 8c99e307b20c502e55c425897fb3884ba8f05882
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date: Sat Jun 25 18:58:02 2022 -0400
Convert DOM to use Ranger rather than EVRP
caused
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C -std=g
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 08:58:49AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 2:34 AM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 2:24 PM Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> > >
> > > A few testcases were marked for avr target, which has no alignment
> > > requirement