> It seems there was regression on fatigue/fatigue2
> http://gcc.opensuse.org/c++bench/pb11/ Fatigue
> was one of reasons to intorduce the heuristics, so it may be related to the
> patch :(
The test in pr 64099 comment 14 now requires -fwhole-program to inline the
subroutine perdida:
[Book15]
Honza,
> this is a variant of patch I commited (adding the suggested predicate)
This caused https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67923
Probably related pr66238 and pr66762.
TIA
Dominique
On 15/09/15 23:18, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Kugan
> wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds support for new tree code SEXT_EXPR.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cfgexpand.c b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
> index d567a87..bbc3c10 100644
> --- a/gcc/cfgexpand.c
> +++ b/gcc/cfgexpand.c
> @@ -5071,6 +
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:25:38PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Lynn A. Boger" writes:
>
> > Index: gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h
> > ===
> > --- gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h (revision 228653)
> > +++ gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h
Alan Modra writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/go/gospec.c b/gcc/go/gospec.c
> index ca3c2d7..fbb55be 100644
> --- a/gcc/go/gospec.c
> +++ b/gcc/go/gospec.c
> @@ -120,8 +120,10 @@ lang_specific_driver (struct cl_decoded_option
> **in_decoded_options,
>/* Whether the -S option was used. */
>bool
From fadd991f87dbd5752e9b6a2cce300dfe7cc8af25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chen Gang
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 22:59:35 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] gcc/ira.c: Check !HAVE_FP_INSTEAD_INSNS when frame pointer is
needed and as global register
For some architectures (e.g. bfin), when this case occurs, the
2015-10-11 Uros Bizjak
* config/alpha/alpha.h (ALPHA_ROUND): Implement using ROUND_UP macro.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on alphaev68-linux-gnu, committed
to mainline SVN.
Uros
Index: config/alpha/alpha.h
===
--- conf
Tested on Linux-PPC64.
/cp
2015-10-11 Ville Voutilainen
PR c++/58566
* lambda.c (lambda_return_type): Return error_mark_node
instead of void_type_node for the error cases.
/testsuite
2015-10-11 Ville Voutilainen
PR c++/58566
* g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-58566.C: New.
On 11 October 2015 at 20:05, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
> Tested on Linux-PPC64.
>
> /cp
> 2015-10-11 Ville Voutilainen
>
> PR c++/58566
> * lambda.c (lambda_return_type): Return error_mark_node
> instead of void_type_node for the error cases.
>
> /testsuite
> 2015-10-11 Ville Voutil
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote
>
> Please remind me why this logic isn't implemented as a target hook.
>
> supports_split_stack = TARGET_CAN_SPLIT_STACK;
>
> /* rs6000.h */
> #define TARGET_CAN_SPLIT_STACK TARGET_64BIT
There is a target hook for split stack support in
gcc/c
Ping?
(I don't have commit access)
Samuel Thibault, le Sat 19 Sep 2015 14:00:23 +0200, a écrit :
> On Linux, -p and -pg do not make gcc link against libc_p.a, only
> -profile does (as documented in r11246), and thus people expect -p
> and -pg to work without libc_p.a installed (it is actually eve
Hi.
I'm investigating balanced binary tree options for the multiple
priorities variant of the task scheduler. In looking at the splay tree
adaption in libgomp, I noticed that it requires preexisting typedefs and
other definitions before including splay-tree.h. This makes it
impossible to re
On Thu, 2015-10-08 09:37:03 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
[...]
> Heres the patch for reordered headers. Building as we speak. Hard to fully
> verify since Ada doesn't seem to bootstrap on trunk at the moment:
>
> +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
> | 6
On 10/10/15 11:00, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
I've committed this to gomp4 branch. Both these tests are trying an 'acc loop'
outside of an offload region. That's an error.
Missed that goacc/nesting-1 had 2 bogus loops.
nathan
2015-10-11 Nathan Sidwell
* c-c++-common/goacc/nesting-1.c: Rem
On 10/09/15 09:59, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
It's s string describing the pragma as parsed thus far. Again, not
documenting that as well as our usage of it is totally "standard", see
OpenMP's cp_parser_omp_parallel, cp_parser_omp_for, and many more.
Ok, I'm not going to hold this to a higher th
On 10/11/2015 02:58 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
On Thu, 2015-10-08 09:37:03 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
[...]
Heres the patch for reordered headers. Building as we speak. Hard to fully
verify since Ada doesn't seem to bootstrap on trunk at the moment:
+===GNAT BUG D
> On 10/11/2015 02:58 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> >On Thu, 2015-10-08 09:37:03 -0400, Andrew MacLeod
> >wrote:
> >[...]
> >>Heres the patch for reordered headers. Building as we speak. Hard to fully
> >>verify since Ada doesn't seem to bootstrap on trunk at the moment:
> >>
> >>+
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:29:36AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote
> >
> > Please remind me why this logic isn't implemented as a target hook.
> >
> > supports_split_stack = TARGET_CAN_SPLIT_STACK;
> >
> > /* rs6000.h */
> > #define TARGET_CAN
I've committed this to gomp4
1) move IFN_UNIQUE constants to the IFN_UNIQUE function definition
2) Update IFN_GOACC_REDUCTION_* comments to match the renamed oacc_device_lower
pass.
nathan
2015-10-11 Nathan Sidwell
* internal-fn.def (IFN_UNIQUE_UNSPEC, IFN_UNIQUE_OACC_FORK,
IFN_UNIQUE_O
This was spurred a bit by the need to fix 67892, which is a problem with
the old threader's support for threading across backedges.
I've indicated in the past that I'd like to simply drop that code. It's
fragile and generally just a PITA. The functionality would be replaced
by Sebastian's FS
-Original Message-
From: Bin.Cheng [mailto:amker.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 8:15 AM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Cc: GCC Patches; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida;
Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: [RFC, Patch]: Optimized changes in the register used ins
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Attached patch documents new functionality in gcc-6 release notes.
>x86-64 targets now allow stack realignment from word-aligned stack
>pointer
Something seems to be missing/odd here? "a word-aligned stack
pointer" or "word-aligned stack
The problem involves a derived type with a character component declared
CHARACTER(NULL()) or CHARACTER(NULL(n)), where mold argument n is an integer
pointer.
I might be missing something, but I'm not sure there's a point to having a
character variable whose length is the target of a null pointe
Hi,
tree_profiling clears PURE/CONST flags on all functions it touches. This is
from the times when optimization and instrumentation was mixed and it was
necessary to keep things synchronized so early optimization of later functions
is not affected by the instrumentation. This is no longer case f
Hi,
this patch fixes a case of extreme imprecision I noticed while looking into
profiles of PHP interpretter. There is a function that is called 22 times
and contains the main loop. Now since the frequency of entry block is dropped
to 0, we do not have any information of relative frequencies in th
26 matches
Mail list logo
