[Bug sanitizer/84428] ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384 "((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

2018-04-05 Thread vfried at opentext dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 --- Comment #15 from Vojtech Fried --- I am also getting this error. Our code is a big python extension. I run python3 and use LD_PRELOAD. In our code it throws an exception that would normally be caught. ==23331==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:

[Bug sanitizer/84428] ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384 "((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

2018-04-05 Thread vfried at opentext dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 --- Comment #17 from Vojtech Fried --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #16) > Is it public, so that I can reproduce that? No, it is not public and it is also a large project, so it is not useful for reproducing the issue. I am sorry.

[Bug sanitizer/84428] ==7122==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: ../../../sanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc:384 "((__interception::real___cxa_throw)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)

2018-04-06 Thread vfried at opentext dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428 --- Comment #18 from Vojtech Fried --- Created attachment 43866 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43866&action=edit simple repro I have added a simple way to reproduce it. Unpack and run run.sh. You need python3 installed (inc

[Bug libstdc++/71025] New: std::call_once aborts instead of propagating an exception (AIX 6.1)

2016-05-09 Thread vfried at opentext dot com
Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vfried at opentext dot com Target Milestone: --- When an exception is thrown inside a function called from std::call_once, the process is aborted. The exception should be

[Bug libstdc++/71025] std::call_once aborts instead of propagating an exception (AIX 6.1)

2016-05-09 Thread vfried at opentext dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71025 --- Comment #1 from Vojtech Fried --- I am sorry, probably duplicate of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146