http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50772
Bug #: 50772
Summary: Inline assembler "A" constrain works non-expectedly on
64-bits target
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54137
Bug #: 54137
Summary: expected primary-expression error when accessing
template method
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54137
--- Comment #2 from vagran 2012-07-31 11:46:02
UTC ---
Thanks!
Would be fine if the error message could contain the probable cause hint for
this kind of error (if technically possible).
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vagran.ast at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
On Ubuntu 18.04.1 I try to compile and run example from
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/locale/codecvt/out under Valgrind.
#include
#include
#include
int main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89118
--- Comment #1 from vagran ---
If using std::locale::classic() it additionally does not return valid result as
well. According to standard it should. See notes:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/locale/locale/classic.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336
--- Comment #9 from vagran ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > Is this test valid? BTW, clang works fine on x86.
>
> No this testcase is not valid at all. See
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedoc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60336
--- Comment #24 from vagran ---
Just to be on a safe side, please, also do not forget that empty struct (or
class) is really zero in the case when another structure (or class) is derived
from it. For example, such test would be useful after fix:
