Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
git g:73bc09fa8c6b973a928a599498caa66a25c8bc8d, r10-7272
Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94239
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:497498c878d48754318e486428e2aa30854020b9, r10-7312
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr39902-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr79916.c (test for
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g: 4a01f7b1e73e98a86520d8a825ddd3777faa7c33
r10-7320
These fail on all powerpc64 targets.
I don't know what
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:724ec02c2c6d1b79788be77f68ebb6ca7b5b6acd, r10-7372
This specific revision can't be built because of a compilation error but this
is where the test case was introduced.
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
FAIL: g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C -O0 (test for
excess errors
,
||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
--- Comment #8 from Bill Seurer ---
I have duplicated the bug on a cross compile but not natively.
It occurs in the one function:
int do_signbit_if (__ibm128 a) { return __builtin_signbit (a); }
Natively this looks like this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #12 from Bill Seurer ---
confgures are identical.
Default compiler options are also identical, from -Q --help=target:
The following options are target specific:
-G0
-m32
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr93365.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error)
FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94386
--- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer ---
The problem is definitely caused by
g:7d57570b0658b8c1b8a97dafa53dfd4ab4bd3f65, r10-7444
I built it before and no problems, errors after.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94386
--- Comment #6 from Bill Seurer ---
git g:3fb7f2fbd5f109786922deb5af8fd8dd594a7ba6, r10-7443
make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gfortran.dg/pr93600_1.f90
# of expected passes3
git g:7d57570b0658b8c1b8a97dafa53dfd4ab4bd3f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #14 from Bill Seurer ---
I compared what happens with long double and they are very different
int do_signbit_tf (long double a) { return __builtin_signbit (a); }
cross:
;;
;; Full RTL generated for this function:
;;
(note 1 0 4 NOTE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94315
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g: 2523d721cfc861a3abea6e97736446c99ba8b52d, r10-7552
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/./prev-gcc/xg++
-B/home
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:8bf5faa9c463f0d53ffe835ba03d4502edfb959d, r10-7632
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94533
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|errors in new test case |errors in new test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #15 from Bill Seurer ---
Martin, are you expecting this build to have 64 bit or 128 bit long doubles?
The default should be 128 as it is natively but for some reason the cross
compiler is using 64. Even with that, though, the compil
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:33c45e51b4914008064d9b77f2c1fc0eea1ad060, r10-7665
FAIL: gfortran.dg/substr_6.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)
FAIL
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:892c755eae2e2e45547395013695fdd819c297fa, r9-8486
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-10b.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163
--- Comment #17 from Bill Seurer ---
Is there some earlier report to which this is a follow-on? The first comment
here sort of implies that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #29 from Bill Seurer ---
The suggestion above was to use -finline-arg-packing but I will try
-fno-inline-arg-packing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512
--- Comment #30 from Bill Seurer ---
I tried
-fno-inline-arg-packing
and with that the time to build all of spec2017 is 28m43 versus 63m to 65m
without.
For my purposes this is fine BUT will using this option have some sort of
performance effe
: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
commit 619602346aed9dae3f338d9f18767414446adf78, r10-7850
Note I only saw this on powerpc64 LE.
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t032 cp_compat_x_tst.o
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
A bunch of the newly activated libphobos test cases fail on powerpc64. I saw
this on both BE and LE.
FAIL: libphobos.allocations/tls_gc_integration.d execution test
FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94825
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:9b8e9006bb35641865358e2df4f6b3ae185b239a, r10-7999
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home3/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
-B/home3/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
commit g:78b9783774bfd3540f38f5b1e3c7fc9f719653d7, r10-8012
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
/home3/seurer/gcc/git/build
: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
This only happens on power 7 BE. Didn't see it on power 8 BE.
this run: g:308bc496884706af4b3077171cbac684c7a6f7c6, r11-59: 127 failures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94974
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
this run: g:f8a4141bae53f9125d374e5873dcda3f75392f1f, r11-169
FAIL
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
this run: g:bc484e250990393e887f7239157cc85ce6fadcce, r11-205:
This occurs on all powerpc 64 targets:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer ---
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c (test for excess errors)
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c scan-tree-dump slp2 "not profitable"
PASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c scan-tree-dump-times slp2 "BB vectorizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #3 from Bill Seurer ---
Created attachment 48508
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48508&action=edit
dump file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #5 from Bill Seurer ---
Created attachment 48509
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48509&action=edit
dump file p7 specific
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer ---
And for the power 7 specific one (the other one also occurs on power 7)
Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
Several of the spec 2000 test cases (specifically ) ICE when being built now.
Errors are occurring in a couple of different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95064
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||powerpc64*-linux-gnu
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #10 from Bill Seurer ---
I tried the update on the spec 2000/2006 tests that were ICEing before and they
compile now.
: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #11 from Bill Seurer ---
/home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/bin/gfortran -c -o
module_ra_cam.fppized.o -I. -I./netcdf/include -I./inc -m64 -O0 -g3
-mcpu=power8 -Wno-deprecated-declarations -fconvert=big-endian -std=legacy
module_ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #13 from Bill Seurer ---
I don't know fortran and this appears to be part of a multi-thousand line
extremely complex function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #17 from Bill Seurer ---
he patch works and has no further fallout that I see.
I will still try to extract something small from that big fortran function but
as I have not written any fortran code in more than 35 years it may take a
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
git g:f884bef2105d748fd7869cd641cbb4f6b6bb, r11-349
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=gomp.exp=gfortran.dg/gomp/target1.f90
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:f6e1a4cd83190746b6544917f7526fa480ca5f18, r11-345
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #18 from Bill Seurer ---
I am still cutting down the code but this should answer the question about if
it really could be zero:
if (cldeps > 0) then
do k = k1,k2
asor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #19 from Bill Seurer ---
There's some stuff above this in the module but this is the part that shows the
error and I think it contains all the declarations.
subroutine Z()
real(r8) :: cld(99,99)
real(r8) cldeps
parameter (cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #21 from Bill Seurer ---
We can't modify the spec code but we can add "compatibility" options.
Shouldn't the if test make the compiler ignore the statement with the divide by
zero? It shouldn't ever be executed.
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:573e5f0500968dcf4025b8fc0ae5fb367f9c70d9, r11-477
r11-476 worked fine.
While building the compiler:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag CXX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95223
--- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer ---
It was definitely r11-477. I see this causing an ICE when building gcc albeit
only on power 9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95223
--- Comment #10 from Bill Seurer ---
It works for me, too, now. Thanks!
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:a4b48fc47c3406b6f41be093c4615879b7006710, r11-478
FAIL
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
After r11-205 gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr69907.c fails during make check. I only see
this on a power 7.
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
One example:
Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test2/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95273
--- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer ---
Here's a full list:
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/990128-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler
> error)
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/99
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #9 from Bill Seurer ---
It looks good in a test I just ran.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95261
--- Comment #3 from Bill Seurer ---
I just tried on current trunk and these have cleared up now.
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:a746f952abb78af9db28a7f3bce442e113877c9c, r11-611
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=dg-torture.exp=gcc.dg/torture/pr92088-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95273
--- Comment #8 from Bill Seurer ---
Those are new ones. I will track down the source tomorrow morning if no one
else has in the meantime.
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:e31cd607e999ca6ab47b7e65a7045b1594e4fba4, r11-689
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gcc.dg/vshift-5.c
FAIL: gcc.dg/vshift-5.c (internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95391
--- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer ---
Also causes gcc.dg/vect/pr46126.c to ICE in the same spot.
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:ee969a36d9887e1a3230fe3de2d398fd6c6dac49, r11-736
> FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-perm-char.c s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95058
--- Comment #10 from Bill Seurer ---
There is still one that is failing:
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=vect.exp=gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr68892.c scan-tree-dump slp2 "not profitable"
XPASS: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr6
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
Executing on host:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:d176184d98a00ab379ae5959aed1908a79995e6b, r11-594
make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90
FAIL
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gfortran.dg/pr95090.f90
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95090.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95090
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95537
--- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer ---
Wait, perhaps this is the same as pr95530? It started with a different
revision, though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530
--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer ---
The above is all the traceback a normal compiler build provided. I will try
building a debug version.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530
--- Comment #3 from Bill Seurer ---
The debug build did not ICE.
Going back to a normal build and running f951 in gdb I see:
(gdb) run /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90
-quiet -dumpbase equiv_11.f90 -dumpbase-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530
--- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer ---
Note that I did this run on a power 9 LE system.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95537
--- Comment #3 from Bill Seurer ---
Running f951 directly via gdb on a power 9 LE system I see:
(gdb) run /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr95090.f90
-quiet -dumpbase pr95090.f90 -dumpbase-ext .f90 -mcpu=power9 -O -versio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95537
--- Comment #5 from Bill Seurer ---
Still fails:
make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gfortran.dg/pr95090.f90
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95090.f90 -O (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95090.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530
--- Comment #7 from Bill Seurer ---
The fortran.h patch (which looks to be the same one you asked about in pr95537)
works here:
make -k check-gcc-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=gfortran.dg/equiv_11.f90
# of expected passes3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530
--- Comment #8 from Bill Seurer ---
Oops, no, they are different. But this one works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95537
--- Comment #7 from Bill Seurer ---
I used the wrong patch file, sorry.
This patch did not apply cleanly to current trunk.
patching file gcc/fortran/decl.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 4285.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gcc/fortran/de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95537
--- Comment #8 from Bill Seurer ---
Nope, still fails.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95530
--- Comment #10 from Bill Seurer ---
The combined patch cleans up the ICEs for both issues.
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:b825a22890740f341eae566af27e18e528cd29a7, r11-959
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-trunk-bootstrap/./prev-gcc/xg++
-B/home
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer ---
bootstrap works with that patch
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:b825a22890740f341eae566af27e18e528cd29a7, r11-959 and still occurring at
r11-1075
I see the following when doing a simple build (not even a bootstrap) of gcc on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95595
--- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer ---
OK, this will also fails on an LE system if I use --with-cpu=power7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
--- Comment #6 from Bill Seurer ---
I tried the patch and it allowed me to build gcc on a power7 system.
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org,
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95617
--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer ---
oops, thought I had included that:
wn-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/home/seurer/gcc/git/gc
: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:371cc683371bedb0e53ebcee0c0e89604a1e74b1, r11-1181
This appears to affect at the least all powerpc64 and AIX builds. Even basic
non-bootstrap ones.
libtool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95628
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Bu
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:1396fa5b91cfa0b3708ec9df33c0bb84386081d6, r11-1146
Note: this may be related to pr95649.
I am seeing this on powerpc64 when building two of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95649
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95662
--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer ---
OK. If you fix the other one I will try it and see if it fixes this, too.
: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:a97e49a89d11b302b12ec319a3316ba78adca02a, r11-1349
Executing on host:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/home/seurer/gcc
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:92bed036098928cd4659c8990e14cf7ad040e0c2, r11-1350
Note: I only saw this on powerpc64 LE systems, not BE.
Executing on host:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/gcc/testsuite/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95706
--- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer ---
No idea, sorry. Is that the problem? Supposed to be an error but on a
different line?
: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:502d63b6d6141597bb18fd23c87736a1b384cf8f, r11-1445
This also appears to break bootstrap for powerpc64
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vmx/5-11.c -O0 (internal compiler er
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:5acc654e380797bbf402bc3a0a67f9a6ac4c2a83, r11-1517
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:abcde0a658e17dbbabcb396eaae5a3612e07d401, r11-1595
make -k check-gcc
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:84323d9fa7526496d844f167f6353e0ec12279e8, r9-8693
This same error occurs on both gcc 8 and 9. Bad backport maybe?
commit 84323d9fa7526496d844f167f6353e0ec12279e8
Author: Harald
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:d2adb79eac663874593a28387db593fb4bb2995f, r11-1649
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g:86ce59b4f05d8f68ec4d9a14a7732acb370412db, r11-1647
Saw this on powerpc64 both BE and LE.
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95877
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
