[Bug other/99363] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/attr-flatten-1.c fails starting with r11-7469

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99363 Bug ID: 99363 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/attr-flatten-1.c fails starting with r11-7469 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/99392] New: [10/11 regression] ICE for g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-variadic20.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99392 Bug ID: 99392 Summary: [10/11 regression] ICE for g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-variadic20.C Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/99392] [10/11 regression] ICE for g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-variadic20.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99392 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Build||powerpc64-linux-gnu

[Bug target/99392] [10/11 regression] ICE for g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-variadic20.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99392 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is probably a duplicate of PR90448

[Bug target/99392] [10/11 regression] ICE for g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-variadic20.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99392 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug c++/90448] [8/9/10/11 Regression] decltype-based lambda parameter pack is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90448 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/90448] [8/9/10/11 Regression] decltype-based lambda parameter pack is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90448 --- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This (still) fails on powerpc BE 32 bit compiler for both gcc 10 and trunk.

[Bug other/99496] New: [11 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_c.C ICEs after r11-7557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496 Bug ID: 99496 Summary: [11 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_c.C ICEs after r11-7557 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/99498] New: [11 regression] new test case g++.dg/opt/pr99305.C in r11-7587 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99498 Bug ID: 99498 Summary: [11 regression] new test case g++.dg/opt/pr99305.C in r11-7587 fails Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/99496] [11 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_c.C ICEs after r11-7557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I only saw the xtreme 3 ICE on a power 9 and the xtreme 4 ICEs on a power 7. Ugh. Generating a .i is not straightforward for this.

[Bug other/99496] [11 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_c.C ICEs after r11-7557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Just running the compilation doesn't work as it requires some stuff that must be generated earlier. In module imported at /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3

[Bug tree-optimization/97494] [11 regression] several vector test case failures starting with r11-3966

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494 --- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I looked through the test results on all our testers and it looks like everything is cleaned up now. Thanks!

[Bug other/99496] [11 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_c.C ICEs after r11-7557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- seurer@marlin:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite$ /home3/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++7/../../xg++ -B/home3/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/g++7/../../ /home/seure

[Bug other/99496] [11 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_c.C ICEs after r11-7557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 50370 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50370&action=edit Requested proprocessed files

[Bug testsuite/99605] New: [11 regress] new test case g++.dg/modules/builtin-3_a.C fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99605 Bug ID: 99605 Summary: [11 regress] new test case g++.dg/modules/builtin-3_a.C fails for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/99607] New: [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/pr98099.c in r11-5706 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99607 Bug ID: 99607 Summary: [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/pr98099.c in r11-5706 fails Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/98099] ICE in gen_lowpart_common, at emit-rtl.c:1554

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98099 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLV

[Bug testsuite/99626] New: [10/11 regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99626 Bug ID: 99626 Summary: [10/11 regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-73.c fails for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug testsuite/99636] New: [10/11 regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-80.c fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99636 Bug ID: 99636 Summary: [10/11 regression] gcc.dg/strlenopt-80.c fails for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug other/99648] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr71522.c fails starting with r11-165 for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99648 Bug ID: 99648 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr71522.c fails starting with r11-165 for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/99655] New: [11 regression] Lots of ICEs in g++.dg/torture/pr85013.C after r11-7723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99655 Bug ID: 99655 Summary: [11 regression] Lots of ICEs in g++.dg/torture/pr85013.C after r11-7723 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99655] [11 regression] Lots of ICEs in g++.dg/torture/pr85013.C after r11-7723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99655 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Host||powerpc64*-linux-gnu

[Bug testsuite/99685] New: gcc.target/powerpc/divkc3-1.c and mulkc3-1.c fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99685 Bug ID: 99685 Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/divkc3-1.c and mulkc3-1.c fails for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/99718] New: [11 regression] ICE in new test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr98914.c for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99718 Bug ID: 99718 Summary: [11 regression] ICE in new test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr98914.c for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug libstdc++/77691] [8/9/10/11 regression] experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug other/99796] New: gfortran.dg/class_assign_4.f90 fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99796 Bug ID: 99796 Summary: gfortran.dg/class_assign_4.f90 fails for 32 bits Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: o

[Bug testsuite/91799] [10/11 regression] r273245 breaks test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr88233.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91799 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOP

[Bug other/99496] [11 regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_c.C ICEs after r11-7557

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99496 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug target/99648] [11 regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr71522.c fails starting with r11-165 for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99648 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The assembler isn't that long so here it is (from -Os): .file "pr71522.c" .machine power8 .section".text" .section.rodata.str1.1,"aMS",@progbits,1

[Bug target/99648] [11 regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr71522.c fails starting with r11-165 for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99648 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Which RTL do you want to see?

[Bug rtl-optimization/96264] [10 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOP

[Bug bootstrap/99920] New: [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 Bug ID: 99920 Summary: [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #7 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I will try to recreate but I got rid of the old build compiler. It was a leftover from some work many years ago and I had forgotten I was even using it.

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- It is during stage1 and I was able to recreate using the system distro compiler, gcc version 4.3.4 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 152973] (SUSE Linux). I will bisect on the .o's now. FWIW here is a lis

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #11 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Swapping out those two .o files (individually and together) didn't yield a successful build. I brought in the 8.4.0 .o files in one at a time and eventually I got a successful build but at that p

[Bug bootstrap/99920] [10 regression] ICE building gcc 10 on power 7 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99920 --- Comment #18 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils I use on there is (GNU Binutils) 2.23.52.20130522

[Bug testsuite/99605] [11 regression] new test case g++.dg/modules/builtin-3_a.C fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99605 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug bootstrap/99983] New: [10 regression] ICE in bootstrap while building libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99983 Bug ID: 99983 Summary: [10 regression] ICE in bootstrap while building libstdc++ Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug bootstrap/99983] [10 regression] ICE in bootstrap while building libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99983 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64*-linux-gnu

[Bug c++/100052] New: [11 regression] ICE in compiling g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C after r11-8118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052 Bug ID: 100052 Summary: [11 regression] ICE in compiling g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C after r11-8118 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug testsuite/100071] New: Test case libgomp.fortran/alloc-2.F90 fails with invalid memory reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100071 Bug ID: 100071 Summary: Test case libgomp.fortran/alloc-2.F90 fails with invalid memory reference Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug testsuite/100073] New: [11 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr86058.c fails after r11-

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100073 Bug ID: 100073 Summary: [11 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr86058.c fails after r11- Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug testsuite/100071] Test case libgomp.fortran/alloc-2.F90 fails with invalid memory reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100071 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks for the fix. Any idea why it failed in the weird way it did? I ran it dozens of times and it only failed and then every time when the 64 bit test run was done a second time?

[Bug libstdc++/98678] 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc execution test FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98678 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/97356] New: [11 regression] several test case failures after r11-3748

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97356 Bug ID: 97356 Summary: [11 regression] several test case failures after r11-3748 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug middle-end/97392] New: [11 regression] g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C compilation failure starting with r11-3827

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97392 Bug ID: 97392 Summary: [11 regression] g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C compilation failure starting with r11-3827 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug analyzer/97411] New: [11 regression] bogus message from gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c after r11-3840

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97411 Bug ID: 97411 Summary: [11 regression] bogus message from gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c after r11-3840 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug testsuite/97426] New: [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/ipa/modref-1.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97426 Bug ID: 97426 Summary: [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/ipa/modref-1.c fails Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug testsuite/97426] [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/ipa/modref-1.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97426 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- g:10744da3452dac48cfa54d4480c269aac56421fa, r11-3909 The above partly fixes this but leaves at least one error: make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="tree-ssa.exp=gcc.dg/tree-ssa/modref-4.c" FAIL: gcc

[Bug other/96927] [11 regression] ICE in libstdc++-v3/include/chrono:442

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96927 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug tree-optimization/97494] New: [11 regression] several vector test case failures starting with r11-3966

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494 Bug ID: 97494 Summary: [11 regression] several vector test case failures starting with r11-3966 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/97504] New: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504 Bug ID: 97504 Summary: [11 regress] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ad

[Bug testsuite/97522] New: [11 regression] test cases fail on powerpc64 BE after r11-4077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97522 Bug ID: 97522 Summary: [11 regression] test cases fail on powerpc64 BE after r11-4077 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/97557] New: [11 regression] several ada test case failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97557 Bug ID: 97557 Summary: [11 regression] several ada test case failures Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504 --- Comment #10 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried it on powerpc64 yesterday and it built on the systems where it had failed previously although there were some new Ada test case failures. I'll give it another run to see if it is still OK

[Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504 --- Comment #14 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Builds fine for me on powerpc64 LE and BE.

[Bug testsuite/97590] New: new test case g++.dg/pr97560.C compilation errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97590 Bug ID: 97590 Summary: new test case g++.dg/pr97560.C compilation errors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/97594] New: new test case gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr97461.c execution failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97594 Bug ID: 97594 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr97461.c execution failure Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug other/97621] New: [11 regression] bogus message in gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c after r11-4434

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97621 Bug ID: 97621 Summary: [11 regression] bogus message in gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c after r11-4434 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug tree-optimization/97678] New: [11 regression] execution fail for gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-run-5.c after r11-4614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97678 Bug ID: 97678 Summary: [11 regression] execution fail for gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-run-5.c after r11-4614 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Stat

[Bug testsuite/97680] New: new test case c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-10.c in r11-4578 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97680 Bug ID: 97680 Summary: new test case c-c++-common/zero-scratch-regs-10.c in r11-4578 has excess errors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/97686] New: [11 regression] fortran.dg/pdt_14.f03 hangs after r11-4586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97686 Bug ID: 97686 Summary: [11 regression] fortran.dg/pdt_14.f03 hangs after r11-4586 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug other/97705] New: [11 regression] cc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c.*r.ira fails after r11-4637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97705 Bug ID: 97705 Summary: [11 regression] cc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c.*r.ira fails after r11-4637 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/97705] [11 regression] cc.c-torture/unsorted/dump-noaddr.c.*r.ira fails after r11-4637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97705 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried this on multiple systems and it looks like it may only fail on a BE system.

[Bug tree-optimization/97744] New: [11 regression] floating point result errors after r11-4637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97744 Bug ID: 97744 Summary: [11 regression] floating point result errors after r11-4637 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug tree-optimization/97744] [11 regression] 32 bit floating point result errors after r11-4637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97744 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This particular test has been problematic before. For example, see pr83497. Previously the change in output was from some floating point operations being reordered causing a minute rounding chang

[Bug testsuite/97788] New: [11 regression] g++.dg/ubsan/pr61272.C fails after r11-4852

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97788 Bug ID: 97788 Summary: [11 regression] g++.dg/ubsan/pr61272.C fails after r11-4852 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug bootstrap/97800] New: [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-4913

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97800 Bug ID: 97800 Summary: [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-4913 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/97800] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-4913

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97800 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCO

[Bug bootstrap/97806] New: [11 regression] bootstrap ICE starting with r11-4921

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97806 Bug ID: 97806 Summary: [11 regression] bootstrap ICE starting with r11-4921 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug tree-optimization/97845] New: [11 regression] ICE at gcc/toplev.c:330 after r11-4982

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97845 Bug ID: 97845 Summary: [11 regression] ICE at gcc/toplev.c:330 after r11-4982 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug go/97853] New: [11 regression] go front end fails to bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97853 Bug ID: 97853 Summary: [11 regression] go front end fails to bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug other/97911] New: [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911 Bug ID: 97911 Summary: [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCON

[Bug other/97911] [11 regression] make install issue undefined reference to std::__throw_bad_array_new_length after r11-5142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97911 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks! It is indeed working again.

[Bug libstdc++/97944] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails randomly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97944 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/95662] [11 regression] ICE at gimple-expr.c:87 since r11-1146

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95662 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAIT

[Bug analyzer/97090] gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c fails on arm and powerpc64*-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97090 --- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I saw FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/malloc-vs-local-1b.c (test for bogus messages, line 170) on a make check for 66dde7bc64b75d4a338266333c9c490b12d49825, r11-5583 just moments ago on a powerpc64 BE box

[Bug fortran/96983] [11 regression] ICE compiling gfortran.dg/pr96711.f90 starting with r11-3042

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983 --- Comment #29 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Still showing up on powerpc64.

[Bug testsuite/98085] New: [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/if-to-switch-2.c fails in r11-5605

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98085 Bug ID: 98085 Summary: [11 regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/if-to-switch-2.c fails in r11-5605 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/98107] New: [11 regression] ICE at hash-table.c:137 starting with r11-5663

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98107 Bug ID: 98107 Summary: [11 regression] ICE at hash-table.c:137 starting with r11-5663 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/98111] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c fails after r11-5674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98111 Bug ID: 98111 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c fails after r11-5674 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/98125] New: New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 Bug ID: 98125 Summary: New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug testsuite/98125] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- #define HAVE_GAS_SECTION_LINK_ORDER 1

[Bug tree-optimization/98131] New: new test case g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nodiscard1.C in r11-5719 has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98131 Bug ID: 98131 Summary: new test case g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nodiscard1.C in r11-5719 has excess errors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug tree-optimization/98180] New: [11 regression] ICE at gcc/toplev.c:327 for gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-revb-runnable.c after r11-5821

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98180 Bug ID: 98180 Summary: [11 regression] ICE at gcc/toplev.c:327 for gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-revb-runnable.c after r11-5821 Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug testsuite/98280] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-logical-ors-char.c fails after t11-5958 with assembler output differences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98280 Bug ID: 98280 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-logical-ors-char.c fails after t11-5958 with assembler output differences Product: gcc Version:

[Bug libstdc++/98298] New: [11 regression] g++.dg/pch/system-1.C assembly comparison fails after r11-6072

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98298 Bug ID: 98298 Summary: [11 regression] g++.dg/pch/system-1.C assembly comparison fails after r11-6072 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug testsuite/98325] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr25376.c fails after r11-5027

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98325 Bug ID: 98325 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr25376.c fails after r11-5027 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug middle-end/95757] [11 regression] missing warning in gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c since r11-1517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95757 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Still seeing this on powerpc64, too. g:8379916b167de9bebc32401526b6f53d06dca349, r11-6152 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25.c" FAIL: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-25

[Bug ipa/98349] New: [11 regression] cc.target/powerpc/sse-movhps-1.c and sse-movlps.c fail after r11-3434

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98349 Bug ID: 98349 Summary: [11 regression] cc.target/powerpc/sse-movhps-1.c and sse-movlps.c fail after r11-3434 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug ipa/98351] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/sse-andnps-1.c and sse2-andnpd-1.c fail after r11-3308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98351 Bug ID: 98351 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/sse-andnps-1.c and sse2-andnpd-1.c fail after r11-3308 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/97298] New: [11 regression] ICE at lto-streamer-out.c:554 after r11-3303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97298 Bug ID: 97298 Summary: [11 regression] ICE at lto-streamer-out.c:554 after r11-3303 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug other/97299] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-3.c fails after r11-3563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97299 Bug ID: 97299 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-reduc-3.c fails after r11-3563 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/97300] New: [11 regression] several test cases fail after r11-3308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97300 Bug ID: 97300 Summary: [11 regression] several test cases fail after r11-3308 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug other/97301] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/sse-movlps-1.c fails after r11-3434

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97301 Bug ID: 97301 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/sse-movlps-1.c fails after r11-3434 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libbacktrace/97310] New: new test case mtest_minidebug from r11-3196 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97310 Bug ID: 97310 Summary: new test case mtest_minidebug from r11-3196 fails on powerpc64 BE Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/97337] New: new test case gcc.dg/pr97315-1.c fails with excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97337 Bug ID: 97337 Summary: new test case gcc.dg/pr97315-1.c fails with excess errors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/98358] New: new test case g++.dg/template/pr98297.C in r8-10683 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98358 Bug ID: 98358 Summary: new test case g++.dg/template/pr98297.C in r8-10683 fails Product: gcc Version: 8.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug libstdc++/98384] New: new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384 Bug ID: 98384 Summary: new test case 20_util/to_chars/long_double.cc in r11-6249 fails on powerpc64 BE Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >