[Bug c++/87436] [7 Regression] G++ produces >300MB .rodata section to initialize struct with big array

2019-01-08 Thread metalcaedes at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87436 --- Comment #13 from Daniel Gibson --- Great, thanks a lot for fixing this!

[Bug c++/87436] New: G++ produces >300MB .rodata section to initialize struct with big array

2018-09-25 Thread metalcaedes at gmail dot com
mal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: metalcaedes at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 44749 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44749&action=edit test code I'm

[Bug c++/87436] G++ produces >300MB .rodata section to initialize struct with big array

2018-09-25 Thread metalcaedes at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87436 Daniel Gibson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||metalcaedes at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/100839] New: -O2 does dangerous optimizations using FMA (please don't break my cross product)

2021-05-30 Thread metalcaedes at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
IRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: metalcaedes at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50893 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50893&action=edit simp

[Bug middle-end/100839] -O2 does dangerous optimizations using FMA (please don't break my cross product)

2021-05-30 Thread metalcaedes at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100839 Daniel Gibson changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Daniel Gibson

[Bug middle-end/100839] -O2 does dangerous optimizations using FMA (please don't break my cross product)

2021-05-30 Thread metalcaedes at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100839 Daniel Gibson changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Daniel Gibson

[Bug middle-end/100839] -O2 does dangerous optimizations using FMA (please don't break my cross product)

2021-05-30 Thread metalcaedes at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100839 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Gibson --- Are you sure about this? I couldn't find much about floats (and nothing about legal transformations) in the C++ standard, and if it's in IEEE-754 it should be the same for C and C++, right?