Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jolsa at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
We are missing expected declaration tag - DW_AT_declaration : 1 for function
in debug info data.
The problem we see is:
- fs/init.c calls vfs_getattr function
- vfs_getattr is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #2 from Jiri Olsa ---
Created attachment 49223
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49223&action=edit
fs/init.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #4 from Jiri Olsa ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> So this is really just something like: -O2 -g -dA:
> extern int foo (unsigned int, unsigned int);
>
> int
> bar (void)
> {
> foo (1, 2);
> return 0;
> }
>
> whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #9 from Jiri Olsa ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Also, to avoid confusion, upstream 10 branch is not affected, but in 10-RH
> we've backported the PR96383 changes from the trunk.
Is this gcc going to RHEL8? that co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #11 from Jiri Olsa ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> RHEL8 uses gcc 8 which is not affected (unless one uses DTS/GTS).
> Also, it is unclear for what in particular pahole or what wants to use
> DW_AT_declaration.
pah
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #13 from Jiri Olsa ---
hi,
any update on the fix? I'm seeing the bug now in fedora 32 with:
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 10.2.1 20201005 (Red Hat 10.2.1-5)
thanks,
jirka
