Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eda-qa at disemia dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35594
--- Comment #1 from eda-qa at disemia dot com 2008-03-14 21:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=15323)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15323&action=view)
g++ --save-temp fail.cc
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35594
--- Comment #3 from eda-qa at disemia dot com 2008-03-14 21:34 ---
Agreed. That was the obvious bit I was missing.
Sorry about that, just didn't recognize it at first.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35594
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57178
Bug #: 57178
Summary: bogus warning with -O3 using boost::optional
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57178
--- Comment #1 from eda-qa at disemia dot com 2013-05-05 14:56:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 30034
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30034
example
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50455
Bug #: 50455
Summary: duplicate class/constructor silently accepted, wrong
constructor linked
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50455
--- Comment #1 from eda-qa at disemia dot com 2011-09-19 12:20:24 UTC ---
The compiler/linker is silently ignoring that a class has been defined twice
and this results in the linker linking to the incorrect constructor at
instantiation time.
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50455
--- Comment #2 from eda-qa at disemia dot com 2011-09-19 12:21:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 25317
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25317
2 of 2 reproduction source files
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50455
--- Comment #3 from eda-qa at disemia dot com 2011-09-19 12:23:13 UTC ---
Triage notes: As the issue is that no diagnostic is produced I was uncertain
how to locate duplicates -- I tried a few search queries and came up empty.
Also note that both
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50455
--- Comment #4 from eda-qa at disemia dot com 2011-09-19 12:25:08 UTC ---
g++ (GCC) 4.4.5 20101112 (Red Hat 4.4.5-2)
GNU ld version 2.20.51.0.2-20.fc13 20091009
Linux devbox 2.6.34.9-69.fc13.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 3 09:23:03 UTC 2011 x86_64
x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50455
--- Comment #8 from eda-qa at disemia dot com 2011-09-19 12:53:33 UTC ---
I agree that this is a violation of the ODR. I agree this might be difficult
for the linker to detect.
However for a user this is a serious problem that can be very hard to
P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eda-qa at disemia dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22588
--- Additional Comments From eda-qa at disemia dot com 2005-07-21 13:24
---
Created an attachment (id=9317)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9317&action=view)
Testcase/demonstration of defect
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22588
s
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eda-qa at disemia dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Additional Comments From eda-qa at disemia dot com 2005-07-21 19:54
---
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f95,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr--enable-shared
--with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib
--- Additional Comments From eda-qa at disemia dot com 2005-07-21 19:55
---
Created an attachment (id=9325)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9325&action=view)
demostration of the error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22597
Version: 3.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eda-qa at disemia dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19741
--- Additional Comments From eda-qa at disemia dot com 2005-02-01 14:06
---
Created an attachment (id=8121)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8121&action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19741
--- Additional Comments From eda-qa at disemia dot com 2004-06-28 05:40 ---
Agreed. The redux and my original code are invalid, putting the template
specialization in its proper namespace removes the error.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16224
ponent: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eda-qa at disemia dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18756
--- Additional Comments From eda-qa at disemia dot com 2004-12-01 15:10
---
Created an attachment (id=7649)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7649&action=view)
Non preprocessed file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18756
--- Additional Comments From eda-qa at disemia dot com 2004-12-01 15:12
---
Created an attachment (id=7650)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7650&action=view)
ii file.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18756
--- Additional Comments From eda-qa at disemia dot com 2004-12-01 16:24
---
To summarize, this defect effectively states that:
assert( (x/y) == (x/y) )
may cause an assertion if compiled with optimization.
While I understand why it happens, that doesn't mean it isn't a def
23 matches
Mail list logo
