--- Comment #12 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 18:10 ---
Not worth backporting to 4.0.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 09:39 ---
Subject: Bug 25414
Author: aph
Date: Thu Apr 20 09:39:22 2006
New Revision: 113113
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113113
Log:
2006-04-05 Archit Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 11:25 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#known
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2839
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27352
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 15:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=11344)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11344&action=view)
Test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27352
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 15:18 ---
The output of this test should be something like:
java.lang.Throwable
at MySecurityManager.checkPermission(t.java:33)
at java.lang.Class.getClassLoader(Class.java:580)
at trial.x(trial.java:5
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 10:08 ---
The real reason is that we want the actual caller of
SecurityManager.checkPermission(), but we're walking up the stack to the user
code that called Class.newInstance() Class.getMethod(). This problem is as far
a
--- Comment #16 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-03 10:11 ---
I can certainly do that, but it doesn't fail on HEAD. Are you sure you really
want it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26447
--- Comment #18 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-03 10:22 ---
gcj -findirect-dispatch doesn't work with .java files, only with .class files,
so I didn't try it.
class XMLStreamWriter
{
void writeCharacters(String s) {}
}
class XMLStreamException extends Exception
--- Comment #11 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-04 13:54 ---
Subject: Bug 26858
Author: aph
Date: Thu May 4 13:54:15 2006
New Revision: 113526
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113526
Log:
2006-05-04 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-04 18:45 ---
Subject: Bug 27352
Author: aph
Date: Thu May 4 18:44:53 2006
New Revision: 113532
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113532
Log:
2006-05-04 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 17:41 ---
Xref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191211
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12257
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 10:59 ---
I can replicate this problem with gcj 4.1 and gcj svn trunk.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 11:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=11470)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11470&action=view)
A simpler testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27590
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 11:21 ---
zorro:~ $ gcj -shared -O -findirect-dispatch StandardServer.class
org/apache/catalina/core/StandardServer.java: In class
'org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer':
org/apache/catalina/core/StandardServer.java:
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 11:25 ---
Failed in link_block during finish_eh_generation ():
/* Link block B to chain after AFTER. */
void
link_block (basic_block b, basic_block after)
{
b->next_bb = after->next_bb;
b->prev_bb = after;
after
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 11:51 ---
There is a branch to a deleted label.
The RTL looks like this:
note 1148 1143 1144 237 [bb 372] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(insn 1144 1148 1145 237 (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
(compare:CCZ (reg:DI 408
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 11:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=11503)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11503&action=view)
Test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27754
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 14:31 ---
Subject: Bug 27754
Author: aph
Date: Wed May 24 14:31:23 2006
New Revision: 114043
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114043
Log:
2006-05-24 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 09:56 ---
.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 10:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=11512)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11512&action=view)
Patch
Try this. If it works for you I'll check it in.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27756
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 10:12 ---
This is caused by ecj generating non-nested variable scopes.
In Method name:"seekTypesInBinaryPackage":
slot#13: name: i, type: int (pc: 254 length: 82)
slot#15: name: elementName, type: java.lang.Strin
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 10:20 ---
I have found the real cause of these weird non-nested variable ranges.
It's because ecj reorganizes for loops in this way:
for (a; b; c)
{
foo;
}
becomes
goto barf;
do
{
foo;
c;
barf:
a;
if (!b)
g
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 10:23 ---
Err, I mean:
a;
goto barf;
do
{
foo;
c;
barf:
if (!b)
goto x;
} forever;
x:
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27756
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 13:52 ---
Subject: Bug 27756
Author: aph
Date: Fri May 26 13:52:18 2006
New Revision: 114131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114131
Log:
2006-05-25 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 13:54 ---
What am I supposed to write here, anyway? It's fixed because I fixed it.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 12:44 ---
Subject: Bug 1305
Author: aph
Date: Tue Jun 13 12:43:56 2006
New Revision: 114609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114609
Log:
2006-06-09 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #14 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 12:44 ---
Subject: Bug 27908
Author: aph
Date: Tue Jun 13 12:43:56 2006
New Revision: 114609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114609
Log:
2006-06-09 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 12:52 ---
Note that this patch has some problems. In particular, it doesn't work with
BC-compiled code. Also, on x86 it doesn't insert memory barrier instructions,
but this is arguably a bug in __sync_synchronize() r
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-15 11:23 ---
gcj creates all its trampolines on the heap, so exec stack shouldn't be needed.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 11:13 ---
Deferred 'til ecj.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedT
--- Comment #15 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 17:38 ---
Subject: Bug 27908
Author: aph
Date: Mon Jun 19 17:38:08 2006
New Revision: 114778
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114778
Log:
2006-06-19 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 17:38 ---
Subject: Bug 1305
Author: aph
Date: Mon Jun 19 17:38:08 2006
New Revision: 114778
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114778
Log:
2006-06-19 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-26 09:45 ---
Thank you for this patch.
It seems to be a patch for the core constant folding code. Would it not be
more
appropriate to do this in the Java front end's function convert() (in
java/typeck.c) ?
--
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-12 16:59 ---
I can't duplicate this one.
(gdb) s
gnu.java.lang.MainThread.MainThread(java.lang.Class, java.lang.String[])
([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
at /home/aph/gcc/trunk/libjava/gnu
--- Comment #23 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 13:14 ---
Subject: Bug 19505
Author: aph
Date: Mon Jul 17 13:14:38 2006
New Revision: 115518
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115518
Log:
2006-07-13 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 17:56 ---
Please try
jar cf ../tools.zip `find . -name .svn -prune -o -type d -print`
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38251
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 18:29 ---
Yes, of course.
jar has an update mode that adds files, so I can use that. How long may an
arglist be?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38251
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 18:48 ---
Sure, if you can use zip instead, do that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38251
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-24 18:52 ---
I suggest
jar cf ... to create it, and
zip u ... to add to it
that way you'll get the correct META-INF directory.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38251
--- Comment #10 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 11:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=16870)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16870&action=view)
Link map
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38396
--- Comment #11 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 11:32 ---
This looks like a bug to me.
zorro:tmp $ gcj /home/aph/gcc/trunk/ecj.jar
--main=org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch.Main -o ecj -findirect-dispatch
zorro:tmp $ readelf -d ecj
Dynamic section at offset 0xa92728
--- Comment #12 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 12:17 ---
Look at the exported symbols in the old version of libgcj_bc.so.
Make sure that these symbols are exported:
_Jv_JNI_PopSystemFrame
_Jv_LookupInterfaceMethod
_Jv_MonitorExit
_Jv_RegisterResource
--
http
--- Comment #16 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 13:26 ---
You'll still have the same problem until the change that adds the symbols to
libgcj_bc.so is back-ported to the gcc 4.3 branch.
I should have applied that change to the gcc 4.3 branch, but I didn't
realize
--- Comment #20 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-10 14:29 ---
OK, I will do all these fixes.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38751
--- Comment #24 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-12 17:36 ---
Subject: Bug 38396
Author: aph
Date: Mon Jan 12 17:35:48 2009
New Revision: 143301
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143301
Log:
2009-01-12 Andrew Haley
PR libg
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 14:59 ---
Thanks for looking.
As far as I can see _Jv_GetStringChars has been extern inline forever, so
doesn't matter. Probably should have a matching definition, but will never be
called.
_Jv_CreateJavaVM in libgcj.so
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-09 10:38 ---
These are new tests, and real bugs. They are not regressions, and may be
XFAILed on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-15 09:07 ---
That probably is my fault. However, I can't do anything about it until I see
the testsuite log file.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-15 09:08 ---
Re http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg00929.html:
That was answered on Fri, 12 Jun by Kaz Kojima.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40385
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-15 09:29 ---
I need to know why it's crashing. Usually there's some sort of error message.
If there's not, there's no choice but to debug.
This Darwin problem is clearly not the same bug as 40385, so it needs
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-15 15:47 ---
Adding Andreas Tobler; perhaps he knows.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 10:12 ---
Thanks for the patch, Andreas. Please push upstream(s).
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40590
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-29 16:12 ---
See the thread at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2009-06/msg00066.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40590
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-29 16:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=18093)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18093&action=view)
Test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40590
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-29 17:51 ---
Subject: Bug 40590
Author: aph
Date: Mon Jun 29 17:50:59 2009
New Revision: 149059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149059
Log:
2009-06-29 Andrew Haley
PR java/40590
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-30 09:59 ---
Fixed by commit.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-28 08:02 ---
This is actually a regression in debuginfo: the line number info is being
corrupted, somewhere after the front end. I don't know if this was caused by
the gimplify unit-at-a-time patch.
--
aph at gcc dot gn
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-30 07:37 ---
This regression in debuginfo seems to have been downgraded to P4, with no
explanation or discussion of which I'm aware.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40867
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-30 11:36 ---
Hmm, this seems to me as a rather perverse interpretation of the rule that
"Java issues are not release-critical": this bug may be manifested in Java
programs, but there is no evidence of which I'm
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-30 17:24 ---
This seems to be happening very early, because the very first tree dump shows:
StackTrace2$Inner.doCrash(java.lang.Object) (struct StackTrace2$Inner * this,
struct java.lang.Object * o)
[StackTrace2.java : 0:0
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-03 17:55 ---
Subject: Bug 40867
Author: aph
Date: Mon Aug 3 17:55:11 2009
New Revision: 150376
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150376
Log:
2009-07-31 Andrew Haley
PR java/40867
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 16:15 ---
You can get the class by generating a special-purpose thunk using the libffi
invocation interface and pointing the vector at the thunk.
Virtual methods are easy to do by adding a suitable "NoClassDefFoundError&qu
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 10:40 ---
It's not possibe from this description to tell when this problem occurs, nor
which kind of error it is. What does "crash" mean? When does it occur?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24616
--- Comment #11 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 14:52 ---
You're not describing this clearly. :-)
We need to point the execution vector at a piece of code that throws an
exception with the appropriate args. Now, how should we do that?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Comment #18 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 15:28 ---
It's probably not the best idea to solve everything in this bug in a single
patch.
Better make several patches, for the different issues.
Also, if there are some verifier changes needed, let's get those
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 18:22 ---
Two things:
Does this work for fds that aren't associated with sockets?
It doesn't quite avoid the need for locking, since we still need to make sure
that we only close an fd once.
--
http://gcc.gnu.or
--- Comment #21 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 17:20 ---
Accesses to static fields should be fixed already when compiling BC.
We generate a call to _Jv_ResolvePoolEntry(Class, int) for every static field
reference, which resolves the target class and returns a pointer to
--- Comment #23 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 13:46 ---
mm, I was wrong about static fields.
The problem is that a JV_CONSTANT_Fieldref constant pool entry points to a
JV_CONSTANT_Class, and at the present time we attempt to resolve that
JV_CONSTANT_Class reference at link
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-24 11:48 ---
Consider this program:
public class TimedWait
{
public static void main (String[] argv)
throws InterruptedException
{
Object o = new Object();
synchronized (o)
{
o.wait(Long.MAX_VALUE
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-24 11:48 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q4/msg00222.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-25 16:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25016
Author: aph
Date: Fri Nov 25 16:18:17 2005
New Revision: 107509
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107509
Log:
2005-11-25 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-25 16:31 ---
Subject: Bug 25016
Author: aph
Date: Fri Nov 25 16:31:09 2005
New Revision: 107510
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107510
Log:
2005-11-25 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-25 17:20 ---
Subject: Bug 25016
Author: aph
Date: Fri Nov 25 17:20:09 2005
New Revision: 107511
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107511
Log:
2005-11-25 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-01 15:31 ---
It's caused by only one multilib being installed. The 64-bit one is there, not
the 32-bit one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25207
--- Comment #24 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 17:43 ---
This is great, but an additional test case for dynamic method invocation is
needed.
We need to be able to continue if a class T that contains a method that refers
to a missing class M is initialized. At that time
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 14:40 ---
Subject: Bug 25265
Author: aph
Date: Thu Dec 8 14:40:48 2005
New Revision: 108232
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108232
Log:
2005-12-08 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 14:44 ---
Subject: Bug 25265
Author: aph
Date: Thu Dec 8 14:44:29 2005
New Revision: 108233
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108233
Log:
2005-12-08 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 15:32 ---
Subject: Bug 25265
Author: aph
Date: Thu Dec 8 15:32:44 2005
New Revision: 108235
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108235
Log:
2005-12-08 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25366
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 15:44 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ppzz]$ /home/aph/gcc/trunk/obj-i686-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/jc1
org/gnu/atk/AtkObject.java -fuse-boehm-gc -fnon-call-exceptions -O2 -fjni
-fclasspath=.:/usr/share/java/libgcj-4.1.0.jar -fPIC -o x.s
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 15:58 ---
Please try the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00861.html.
Let me know if it doesn't work.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 16:38 ---
I just tried it with the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00861.html.
Works for me.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 09:41 ---
Subject: Bug 25368
Author: aph
Date: Tue Dec 13 09:41:45 2005
New Revision: 108474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108474
Log:
2005-12-13 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 09:41 ---
Subject: Bug 25366
Author: aph
Date: Tue Dec 13 09:41:45 2005
New Revision: 108474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108474
Log:
2005-12-13 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 09:44 ---
Subject: Bug 25368
Author: aph
Date: Tue Dec 13 09:44:35 2005
New Revision: 108475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108475
Log:
2005-12-13 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 09:44 ---
Subject: Bug 25366
Author: aph
Date: Tue Dec 13 09:44:35 2005
New Revision: 108475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108475
Log:
2005-12-13 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 15:54 ---
This should now be fixed on trunk and 4.1 branch.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25429
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 16:30 ---
This is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175569
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25429
1 - 100 of 443 matches
Mail list logo
