https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117423
--- Comment #21 from pipcet at protonmail dot com ---
Created attachment 61848
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61848&action=edit
patch documenting the problem
This is obviously not something we should consider applying, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121046
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue4294
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120987
--- Comment #22 from Tom de Vries ---
FYI, I've submitted a workaround for gdb that disables -fipa-modref for release
gcc 12.0 - 16.0 (
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2025-July/219213.html ), assuming
that his will be fixed in 16.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120763
Bug 120763 depends on bug 119267, which changed state.
Bug 119267 Summary: RISC-V: gcc generates vsetivli with wrong LMUL with
extended assembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119267
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119267
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121048
Bug ID: 121048
Summary: [16 Regression] Recent vectorizer changes cause RISC-V
testsuite regressions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119742
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Also, do we want to make this change?
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/bitset
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/bitset
@@ -720,7 +720,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER
namespace __bitset
{
-#if _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121047
Bug ID: 121047
Summary: Possible hardware issue with Raptor Lake processors
for code that gcc may generate
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121046
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Ev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121046
Bug ID: 121046
Summary: Asking is_constructible_v, NonTrivial*>
is ill-formed
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121046
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think we should open a library issue to add a constraint to the standard.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121047
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-07-12
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121043
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
While bisecting on gcc-15 branch I can not reproduce the OpenCoarray test
failure. However, I do see the following on gcc-15 pulled this morning. Clean
build.
FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/parameter-3.f90 -O (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86015
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The standard relaxed the rules slightly for iterator difference types, to
permit integer-class types to be used as difference types (see
[iterator.concept.winc]). However, those integer-class types are
imp
=/usr/include/c++/v1 --enable-linker-build-id
--with-build-config='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-cet'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250712 (experimental)
f3186568d09c02a6d8915e43c0f5d7df704dfa0d (Gentoo Hardened 16.0. p, commit
fe1f0199d8773ec7dffa4b7b7c26b1dd56cf6fd6)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121049
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121049
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 61850
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61850&action=edit
localtime.c
Reduced it a bit more.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121049
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61852|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88374
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90919
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2020-01-28 00:00:00 |2025-7-12
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121045
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87600
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:651845ceaae26a1b2c03f215e16e7e711dcea2cc
commit r16-2214-g651845ceaae26a1b2c03f215e16e7e711dcea2cc
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Tue Jul 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87600
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6d3c88e7bb07f94308074f9751e4384a191e022
commit r16-2215-ge6d3c88e7bb07f94308074f9751e4384a191e022
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Tue Jul 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120983
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6d3c88e7bb07f94308074f9751e4384a191e022
commit r16-2215-ge6d3c88e7bb07f94308074f9751e4384a191e022
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Tue Jul 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120983
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:651845ceaae26a1b2c03f215e16e7e711dcea2cc
commit r16-2214-g651845ceaae26a1b2c03f215e16e7e711dcea2cc
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Tue Jul 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117998
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114477
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106610
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Isn't this invalid because of [concepts.equality] p6?
The indirectly_readable concept requires that *it works on a const lvalue,
which means it has to behave the same on lvalues and rvalues or the same ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102181
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121049
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61851|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121049
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61850|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121049
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-07-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121045
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121049
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
May have overreduced, sec.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121049
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
35 matches
Mail list logo