https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118890
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-20
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120716
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Summary|ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120708
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:050b1708ea532ea4840e97d85fad4ca63d4cd631
commit r16-1588-g050b1708ea532ea4840e97d85fad4ca63d4cd631
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu Jun 19 05
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120716
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Guess the important part of the patch is
tree **use = const_vars.get (var);
- if (use && TREE_CODE (**use) == DECL_EXPR)
+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120639
--- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp ---
> We could use scatter stores, building the index vector somehow cleverly with
> i_width contiguous indexes interspaced by i_dst_stride. In fact this vector
> could be built as inductions when building the i_h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120598
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120730
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114895
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120639
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025, rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120639
>
> --- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp ---
> > We could use scatter stores, building the i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70308
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120427
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14/15/16 Regression] |[12/13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118276
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120728
Bug ID: 120728
Summary: vmovdqu8 is used on YMM unnecessarily
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120557
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120728
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120728
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120721
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120634
--- Comment #2 from Jørgen Kvalsvik ---
I posted a fix on gcc-patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/687131.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120728
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120724
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-20
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120729
Bug ID: 120729
Summary: Compilation takes forever with -Wuninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120731
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120722
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Stubbs ---
Previously simplify_gen_subreg worked with this pattern:
(reg:DI 106 vcc_lo [orig:693 loop_mask_26 ] [693])
gave
(subreg:SI (reg:DI 106 vcc_lo [orig:693 loop_mask_26 ] [693]) 4)
Now it fails.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120639
--- Comment #5 from Robin Dapp ---
> Well, consider the desired index vector being a real induction (just
> store it somewhere). If we can handle that, we should be able to
> handle the scatter. If not, we can't handle the scatter.
Hmm, I thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120717
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120729
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120729
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So the code checks _all_ paths through the CFG, visited_flag_phis only prunes
backedges during the recursion of of processing one path. To be unlucky
one has to have a very deep back-to-back PHI def chain,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120557
--- Comment #3 from Alex ---
If I remember correctly, originally we decided that deducing this as a
pre-c++23 extension should be pretty benign. Fixing this to work in
c++11 would be going beyond that though, as generic lambdas are c++14,
so ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119971
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119971
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf284e8f5edf0d039b1dd9af5d62e355ce85a7ba
commit r15-9850-gbf284e8f5edf0d039b1dd9af5d62e355ce85a7ba
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118443
Bug 118443 depends on bug 119971, which changed state.
Bug 119971 Summary: [15 Regression] RISC-V: Wrong code with bitmanip extension
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119971
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120722
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Stubbs :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95752870fb5c51868a084b94705a83d728be52c8
commit r16-1593-g95752870fb5c51868a084b94705a83d728be52c8
Author: Andrew Stubbs
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120639
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> Am 20.06.2025 um 16:17 schrieb rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
> :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120639
>
> --- Comment #5 from Robin Dapp ---
>> Well, consider the desired inde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120729
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120720
--- Comment #2 from Simon H. ---
I'm not sure what the canonical non-builtin entrypoint would be in this case.
Some kind of idiom detection?
I tried the is_constant_evaluated() test but it only picks up things which are
explicitly constexpr ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101366
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108585
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120654
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So we get
[irange] UNDEFINED
into range_fits_type_p and then
/* We can only handle integral and pointer types. */
src_type = vr->type ();
if (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (src_type)
&& !POINTER_TYPE_P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120654
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6bd1223bd55ed60fa5dbfd4a8444e133e5e933f5
commit r16-1589-g6bd1223bd55ed60fa5dbfd4a8444e133e5e933f5
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116674
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:638e90e5e8000b6b6b320b02229310c63c441b9f
commit r14-11855-g638e90e5e8000b6b6b320b02229310c63c441b9f
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120654
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15/16 Regression] Crash |[14/15 Regression] Crash at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120666
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120730
Bug ID: 120730
Summary: parse.cc doesn't compile with bison 3.5.1
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: cobol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eebssk1 at godaftwithebk dot
pub
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120634
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jorgen Kvalsvik :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:246c33ac8e8e1967c74ae20c07454a24ef02822a
commit r16-1590-g246c33ac8e8e1967c74ae20c07454a24ef02822a
Author: Jørgen Kvalsvik
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120634
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jorgen Kvalsvik :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69725b13e9dc8bdb17ec8a7d554071b6b517ad47
commit r16-1591-g69725b13e9dc8bdb17ec8a7d554071b6b517ad47
Author: Jørgen Kvalsvik
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120729
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115842
--- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #11)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #8)
> > > (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #7)
> > > > (In rep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120722
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Fails for:
Breakpoint 1, gen_highpart (mode=E_SImode, x=0x77195378) at
/home/tob/repos/gcc/gcc/emit-rtl.cc:1674
1674 gcc_assert (result && !MEM_P (result));
(gdb) p result
$1 = (rtx) 0x0
(gdb) p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120729
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Component|tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120701
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120731
Bug ID: 120731
Summary: Possible error in Strings.Pos causing sigsegv
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120732
Bug ID: 120732
Summary: Compiler doesn't generate a call to a vector function
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120722
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Stubbs ---
It looks like this is the hunk that changes the behaviour.
--- a/gcc/emit-rtl.cc
+++ b/gcc/emit-rtl.cc
@@ -975,8 +975,9 @@ validate_subreg (machine_mode omode, machine_mode imode,
/* Verify that the off
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120598
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 120598, which changed state.
Bug 120598 Summary: Compiler is unable to vectorise scalar code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120598
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120737
Bug ID: 120737
Summary: #pragma omp atomic fails on nvptx
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120741
Bug ID: 120741
Summary: [16 Regression] ICE on mingw-w64-12.0.0: during RTL
pass: pro_and_epilogue ICE in ix86_expand_prologue, at
config/i386/i386.cc:9446
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120742
Bug ID: 120742
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected tree_vec, have
type_pack_expansion in coerce_template_parameter_pack,
at cp/pt.cc:9042
Product: gcc
Version: 16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80151
doug mcilroy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doug at cs dot dartmouth.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120701
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b03e0d69b37f6ea7aef220652635031a89f56a11
commit r16-1594-gb03e0d69b37f6ea7aef220652635031a89f56a11
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Ah nuts! My mistake, I conflated this issue which is "prefetch" with the other
issue in the "prefetchi" space. "prefetchi" is broken and likely requires a
deeper fix than what we need here.
I don't see a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120701
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120701
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod ---
Not sure why the commit isn't showing up... regardless:
commit b03e0d69b37f6ea7aef220652635031a89f56a11
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date: Fri Jun 20 08:50:39 2025 -0400
Fix range wrap check and enhance
^^^ "movl $0, aligned_heap_area" should be used.
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size bar, .-bar
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 16.0.0 20250620 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-tgl-3 gcc]$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120733
Bug ID: 120733
Summary: [16 Regression][aarch64] ICE in gen_highpart, at
lra.cc:1484 since r16-1565-g2dcc6dbd8a00ca
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119966
Dimitar Dimitrov changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119966
--- Comment #18 from Dimitar Dimitrov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> For debug insns, we generally want to be far more tolerant in what subregs
> they accept.
I filed PR120733 to track this particular fallout. I'm not sure i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120734
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120734
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> It is done on purpose with
>
> /* X86_TUNE_SPLIT_LONG_MOVES: Avoid instructions moving immediates
>directly to memory. */
> DEF_TUNE (X86_TUNE_SPLIT_LONG_MOVES, "split
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120735
Bug ID: 120735
Summary: -Warray-bounds error via std::vector::data after
unsigned int overflow potential
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120736
Bug ID: 120736
Summary: [16 Regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since
r15-5375-gbeec291225b
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120739
Bug ID: 120739
Summary: ctf: Emit CTF_K_ARRAY for GNU vector types
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120652
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52582b40a9bf839ae3771de1557ce6691eb8eedd
commit r16-1597-g52582b40a9bf839ae3771de1557ce6691eb8eedd
Author: Pan Li
Date: Thu Jun 19 18:5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120603
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120738
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Long double could be 64bit while having _Float128 too. This is allowed with c23
even. Even _Float16 is not able to be represented.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120738
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120738
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120739
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
A patch for this was already rejected:
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/20250501213426.2252847-2-bruce.mccull...@oracle.com/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120739
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||btf-debug
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120734
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120734
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120738
Bug ID: 120738
Summary: ctf: use CTF_FP_LDOUBLE encoding for 128-bit floats
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120659
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by James K. Lowden :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:007392c0f93cf46b9e87aebdd04e123e3381fc07
commit r16-1595-g007392c0f93cf46b9e87aebdd04e123e3381fc07
Author: James K. Lowden
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120737
Benjamin Schulz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61673|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So I think the way to go for the data prefetching issue is:
1. Define a proper predicate for valid prefetch operands.
a. REG
b. REG+D where D is a simm12 with D & 0xf == 0
c. Immediate wehre immed
90 matches
Mail list logo