https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120251
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:022d8e25e49021b378a4e6c24c2f0c380a066690
commit r16-660-g022d8e25e49021b378a4e6c24c2f0c380a066690
Author: Robert Dubner
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119812
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119928
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abensonca at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120295
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120295
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116546
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65cd212bd4c533351a09e6974f40ae5d7effca84
commit r16-663-g65cd212bd4c533351a09e6974f40ae5d7effca84
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116546
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac55655ce45a237a6a01e0cce50211841603c2ec
commit r16-665-gac55655ce45a237a6a01e0cce50211841603c2ec
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116546
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3327649bffd32af962662dce054b94be2d7330d
commit r16-664-gb3327649bffd32af962662dce054b94be2d7330d
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120251
Robert Dubner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120285
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116546
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120289
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120290
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced:
```
void f(int k){
asm("" : " =r" (k) : "0" (k));
}
```
The space in the output constraint is invalid and is causing the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119632
--- Comment #7 from Simon Sobisch ---
I think
https://gitlab.cobolworx.com/COBOLworx/gcc-cobol/-/commit/9c2fcd3606662e550aea6173b06bc2a500b2ac52
is the right approach (adding a warning later, syntax-check if not iso,
otherwise abort).
But it sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120277
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4291071a6aa3b50800ad5fc70b5fb83cb9398237
commit r16-661-g4291071a6aa3b50800ad5fc70b5fb83cb9398237
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120278
--- Comment #8 from Ken Young ---
It seems to me that even if a naive decision tree is to be generated, it could
be done in a manner that simply checks for the case being equal and not do
anything with greater than
From:
.L9:
cmpl $4, -4(%rbp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116546
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316
Bug 85316 depends on bug 116546, which changed state.
Bug 116546 Summary: Missed optimization of redundant comparison
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116546
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120278
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If you are using -O0 for production code where performance matters, you're
doing something wrong.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120277
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120287
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Summary|[15/16 Regressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120251
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fae53928595341981f08ded4edcbba07ee1d5d04
commit r16-667-gfae53928595341981f08ded4edcbba07ee1d5d04
Author: Robert Dubner
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120278
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Dead branches and dead code definitely appear in -O0 code just about
everywhere, that is not about correctness but about efficiency, which is a
non-goal for -O0.
Even at higher optimization levels compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120287
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-15
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120251
--- Comment #6 from Robert Dubner ---
And this time I figured out how to change a locale to test it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120139
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Thomas Koenig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a85776f7f64271d628ae0a04f02717ee6572e6e8
commit r15-9688-ga85776f7f64271d628ae0a04f02717ee6572e6e8
Author: Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120107
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Thomas Koenig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6ec3a9bddb4224a2369b0284ade4b474cd4b0ce
commit r15-9687-gc6ec3a9bddb4224a2369b0284ade4b474cd4b0ce
Author: Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120107
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120285
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120139
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120278
--- Comment #12 from Ken Young ---
For what it's worth, it has worked well for our simple bare metal ARM
applications written in C and this is the first instance where the generated
object code did extra things that were not expected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120291
--- Comment #1 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
r12-5952-g561414cdf8ef0d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120278
--- Comment #10 from Ken Young ---
"Correctness" (no dead code, no dead branches) matters more than performance in
this instance.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120287
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
With -std=c++0x #c1 ICEs starting with r5-2991-g5e0231c231404677aa1b9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120287
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Keywords|needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120287
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And with s/auto/constexpr auto/g after even more errors ICEs starting with
r5-2539-g4a4f287dc1ae6f111b28e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120287
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|15.2|---
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120297
Bug ID: 120297
Summary: [16 Regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118286
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1c65033b01d43d36b5b7f3713b6e409792bd51c
commit r12-11099-gb1c65033b01d43d36b5b7f3713b6e409792bd51c
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118286
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ebef63ee3a34475ec224ddf0fbc64ccb31033d8d
commit r14-11786-gebef63ee3a34475ec224ddf0fbc64ccb31033d8d
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118286
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ad74a57904744418a7319a492a698ddbfb787ca
commit r13-9658-g9ad74a57904744418a7319a492a698ddbfb787ca
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118286
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93271
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120277
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[16 Regression] Crash at|[16 Regression] Crash at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93271
--- Comment #22 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21)
> Martin, could we backport r15-3070 to 14.3?
It depends on r15-2476-gb3974356b0981c which, IIRC, Richi was not planning to
backport.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120287
Bug ID: 120287
Summary: [15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: tree
check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional'
(error_mark) in is_std_substitution, at
c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120190
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120286
Bug ID: 120286
Summary: [OpenMP] Double free detected when using openmp
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120284
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120288
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
Summary|spurious null
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120170
Bug 120170 depends on bug 65909, which changed state.
Bug 65909 Summary: check_v3_target_namedlocale blows up on targets that don't
support command-line arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
What|Removed
gt;
class std::allocator{}
```
Stack dump
```
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20250515/include/c++/16.0.0/bits/allocator.h:183:9:
internal compiler error: tree check: accessed elt 2 of 'tree_vec' with 1 elts
in tsubst, at cp/pt.cc:16650
183 | allocator(const allocator&l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769
--- Comment #27 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24cd4753e470ec122d232c9da825274bce0bae15
commit r14-11787-g24cd4753e470ec122d232c9da825274bce0bae15
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118623
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa4cd614456de65ee3417acb83c6cff0640144e9
commit r14-11789-gaa4cd614456de65ee3417acb83c6cff0640144e9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118623
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 Regression] g++ |[12/13 Regression] g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118822
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db73411a72cf2052dddcf9fa0523588599a73537
commit r14-11788-gdb73411a72cf2052dddcf9fa0523588599a73537
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120290
Bug ID: 120290
Summary: internal compiler error: in expand_asm_stmt, at
cfgexpand.cc:3720
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120291
Bug ID: 120291
Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_pack_expansion, at
cp/pt.cc:13941 with -std=c++20
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120288
Bug ID: 120288
Summary: spurious null pointer dereference in
std::__detail::_Hashtable_base::_M_key_equals since
gcc-15
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120292
Bug ID: 120292
Summary: amdgcn: Infinite recursion in vec_cmpudi_exec
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab ---
Note that a formal proc argument named "args" is a special case in tcl as it
collects all (remaining) arguments as a list. Either the argument needs to be
named differently (like "locale") or the proc needs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ugh, I forgot that we sometimes use dg-require-namedlocale with an empty
string. I only checked that the change worked for some tests using non-empty
names.
I don't know why the old code worked when doing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120272
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #9)
> Note that a formal proc argument named "args" is a special case in tcl as it
> collects all (remaining) arguments as a list. Either the argument needs to
> b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Maybe "$args" is special too, and not the same as "blah $args blah"?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, it seems to be a property of dejagnu's remote_load and standard_load procs
(which ${tool}_load uses) that interprets the argument as a list and then uses
"" if it's an empty list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think I'll just change the formal argument name to locale instead of args.
We only want to accept a single argument, not a list, and now $locale works
because it's not a list.
I should audit the other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120279
--- Comment #2 from Kael Franco ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I'm not sure what you are after? That in f1() the earlier of both shifts
> can be removed?
Correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120278
--- Comment #5 from Ken Young ---
So -O0 should be expected to generate incorrect decision trees for switch/case
statements now in order to reduce some amount of compile time? Even though it
used to correctly generate the decision tree?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120285
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120278
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99599
--- Comment #31 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ee1fce9fc35de21b28823ccae433c90a0ce270b
commit r16-651-g2ee1fce9fc35de21b28823ccae433c90a0ce270b
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119825
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c430503f2849ebb20105695b8ad40d43d797c7b
commit r16-654-g0c430503f2849ebb20105695b8ad40d43d797c7b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110739
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120223
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120278
--- Comment #7 from Ken Young ---
I guess what I mean by "incorrect" is a branch tree where some of the branch
nodes will never evaluate for both true and false conditions.
I now see that the switch/case "cleanup" has been moved to an optimizat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120293
Bug ID: 120293
Summary: std::format("{}", std::chrono::sys_days()) should not
include time-of-day
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120223
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87d0daab1ec9d5c901295e8045cbd67f80b2fa23
commit r16-655-g87d0daab1ec9d5c901295e8045cbd67f80b2fa23
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Thu May 15 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120294
Bug ID: 120294
Summary: Missed DCE with xor when emulating __builtin_ctzg()
with __builtin_ctz()
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120293
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|std::format("{}", |std::format("{}",
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120190
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk, backport needed for 15.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120190
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c65725eccbabf3b9b5965f27fff2d3b9f6c75930
commit r16-658-gc65725eccbabf3b9b5965f27fff2d3b9f6c75930
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120235
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120235
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6dbcbd96e90159e87a339b98192b7e6e5534b0d7
commit r16-656-g6dbcbd96e90159e87a339b98192b7e6e5534b0d7
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120273
mcccs at gmx dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120294
--- Comment #1 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
pr95861 was also closed - there was a bug in intel hardware that caused
dependency detection false positive, so it would be slow without the xor
tstrap
--enable-checking=release --enable-multilib --program-suffix=-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --no-create --no-recursion
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 16.0.0 20250515 (experimental) (GCC)
Reproduced in Godblot: https://godbolt.org/z/1x1Kvb38
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119809
--- Comment #4 from Simon Sobisch ---
Looking forward to have a compiler targetting ISO COBOL to support that one day
:-)
Note: in C this would be a struct with int : 1, included, I think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120008
--- Comment #2 from H. Peter Anvin ---
Could you please clarify why you think this is not a good idea?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120299
--- Comment #4 from Tymi ---
Why not check for __clang__ and fallback to a compatible solution then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120008
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to H. Peter Anvin from comment #2)
> Could you please clarify why you think this is not a good idea?
Because it is only specific to x86 and more over it is only specific to not
userland. folks wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120299
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Tymi from comment #6)
> so it's a godbolt (compiler explorer) bug...?
No, just godbolt build happened between the 2 commits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120299
--- Comment #6 from Tymi ---
so it's a godbolt (compiler explorer) bug...?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120299
--- Comment #8 from Tymi ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> (In reply to Tymi from comment #6)
> > so it's a godbolt (compiler explorer) bug...?
>
> No, just godbolt build happened between the 2 commits.
Can we someone force/ask
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85750
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d31ab498b12ebbe4f50acb2aa240ff92c73f310c
commit r16-669-gd31ab498b12ebbe4f50acb2aa240ff92c73f310c
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120299
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Tymi from comment #8)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Tymi from comment #6)
> > > so it's a godbolt (compiler explorer) bug...?
> >
> > No, just godbolt build hap
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
