[Bug tree-optimization/111873] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] runtime Segmentation fault with '-O3 -fno-code-hoisting -fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre' since r12-434-g93f8cb4965cebe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111873 --- Comment #16 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed a patch on the mailing list: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/ri6h61oyzn1@virgil.suse.cz/T/#u

[Bug target/120242] [15/16 regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-9239-g4d7a634f6d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120242 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-13 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/120242] [15/16 regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-9239-g4d7a634f6d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120242 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org| --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A.

[Bug modula2/120253] Error message column numbers should start at 1 not 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120253 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a485b83e177cb742be17faf20ac5cc7db14fee3 commit r16-601-g9a485b83e177cb742be17faf20ac5cc7db14fee3 Author: Gaius Mulley Date: Tue

[Bug modula2/120253] Error message column numbers should start at 1 not 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120253 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/111873] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] runtime Segmentation fault with '-O3 -fno-code-hoisting -fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre' since r12-434-g93f8cb4965cebe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111873 --- Comment #17 from Martin Jambor --- *** Bug 120044 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug ipa/120044] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above with "-fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-pre -fno-code-hoisting" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120044 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58091] Non-ambiguous member lookup rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58091 S. Davis Herring changed: What|Removed |Added CC||herring at lanl dot gov --- Comment #

[Bug c++/120267] New: incorrectly ambiguous lookup depending on base class order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120267 Bug ID: 120267 Summary: incorrectly ambiguous lookup depending on base class order Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug tree-optimization/120268] New: Missed removing loop of setting zero when dereference pointer (memset)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120268 Bug ID: 120268 Summary: Missed removing loop of setting zero when dereference pointer (memset) Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/113413] ATAND(Y,X) is unsupported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113413 --- Comment #1 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b239e9cf98ca9238e61e01864ab4dbb5c7f57ce2 commit r16-602-gb239e9cf98ca9238e61e01864ab4dbb5c7f57ce2 Author: Yuao Ma Date: Mon May

[Bug fortran/113413] ATAND(Y,X) is unsupported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113413 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abe8cd9ba6bf8581fd4e4f23c75a15eec276cc00 commit r16-603-gabe8cd9ba6bf8581fd4e4f23c75a15eec276cc00 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: We

[Bug fortran/113413] ATAND(Y,X) is unsupported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113413 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug fortran/108577] [meta-bug] Fortran 2023 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108577 Bug 108577 depends on bug 113413, which changed state. Bug 113413 Summary: ATAND(Y,X) is unsupported https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113413 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug libstdc++/120198] [14/15 Regression] std::scoped_lock disabled for non-gthread environments (such as arm-none-eabi)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120198 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/120254] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120254 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-13 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/120198] [14/15 Regression] std::scoped_lock disabled for non-gthread environments (such as arm-none-eabi)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120198 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c50b8d550d20e42e88b70f0a6e0f6798e30ddcb2 commit r14-11769-gc50b8d550d20e42e88b70f0a6e0f6798e30ddcb2 Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug target/120256] New: [16 Regression] 4% slowdown of 454.calculix on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120256 Bug ID: 120256 Summary: [16 Regression] 4% slowdown of 454.calculix on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec249be3c287c6f1dfb328712ac9c39e6fa95eca commit r16-591-gec249be3c287c6f1dfb328712ac9c39e6fa95eca Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:781cfc454b8dc24952fe7f4c5c409296dca505e1 commit r16-593-g781cfc454b8dc24952fe7f4c5c409296dca505e1 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:482f2192d4ef6af55acae2dc3e0df00b8487cc7d commit r16-592-g482f2192d4ef6af55acae2dc3e0df00b8487cc7d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug libfortran/120196] In findloc2_s* when "back" is true loop goes one more step than needed.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120196 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:748a7bc4624e7b000f6fdb93a8cf7da73ff193bb commit r16-594-g748a7bc4624e7b000f6fdb93a8cf7da73ff193bb Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug target/120256] [16 Regression] 4% slowdown of 454.calculix on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120256 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0

[Bug c++/120257] New: ICE (Segfault) when expanding deeply nested macros with constructor calls (std::string) since 15.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120257 Bug ID: 120257 Summary: ICE (Segfault) when expanding deeply nested macros with constructor calls (std::string) since 15.1 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug modula2/120188] documented example does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120188 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1f94e79dbcfa4b33267db27780870ea7810cd21 commit r16-595-gf1f94e79dbcfa4b33267db27780870ea7810cd21 Author: Gaius Mulley Date: Tue

[Bug c++/120243] [15/16 Regression] Exception rethrown from coroutine promise type unhandled_exception not caught under -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120243 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3) > Started with r15-3148-g6303cd7e41546e "c++, coroutines: Separate the > analysis, ramp and outlined function synthesis." thanks; (unfortunately) not fixed by the c

[Bug rtl-optimization/120258] New: [11/12/13/14/15/16 regression] wrong code at -O{s,1,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120258 Bug ID: 120258 Summary: [11/12/13/14/15/16 regression] wrong code at -O{s,1,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug rtl-optimization/120258] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] wrong code at -O{s,1,2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120258 --- Comment #2 from Kavya Chopra --- This happens to be more latent than the other one though - for instance this is also present in gcc11, whereas the other one wasn't?

[Bug libstdc++/120259] New: Using Incomplete&& as argument in invoke_r/move_only_function fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120259 Bug ID: 120259 Summary: Using Incomplete&& as argument in invoke_r/move_only_function fails to compile Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug gcov-profile/120086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-29.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086 --- Comment #22 from John David Anglin --- I was about to install a similar patch for hppa-hpux. I think the builtin falls back to emitting sync libcalls when enabled or calls to libatomic. Not sure whether the atomic support detection could b

[Bug libstdc++/120259] Using Incomplete&& as argument in invoke_r/move_only_function fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120259 Tomasz Kamiński changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.1.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/120243] [15/16 Regression] Exception rethrown from coroutine promise type unhandled_exception not caught under -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120243 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a09774a9bbfca578f79e8fae3da4cfc99ddb120b commit r15-9668-ga09774a9bbfca578f79e8fae3da4cfc99ddb120b Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad998962ccc8cd190da2d85f0274bbb7bb9f6cae commit r15-9670-gad998962ccc8cd190da2d85f0274bbb7bb9f6cae Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65a8260c19834511034fb62c73139aa304f7eac4 commit r15-9669-g65a8260c19834511034fb62c73139aa304f7eac4 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libfortran/120196] In findloc2_s* when "back" is true loop goes one more step than needed.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120196 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c84a951a8ee151cb4d80dd84f75f421c5f60fa05 commit r15-9671-gc84a951a8ee151cb4d80dd84f75f421c5f60fa05 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/120127] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE in GCC when calling destructor of undefined type name in lambda (lookup_template_class crash)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120127 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in GCC when calling |[12/13/14/15/16 Regression]

[Bug c++/120126] ICE in GCC with pack-dependent decltype in lambda: cp_type_quals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120126 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/120069] [16 Regression] Yes another imagick -march=native -flto -Ofast + PGO regression since r16-270-ga0a64aa5da0af5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120069 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[16 Regression] Yes another |[16 Regression] Yes another

[Bug tree-optimization/120221] Missed optimization related to switch handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120221 --- Comment #7 from Filip Kastl --- So this isn't specific for switches. Rather, this is some kind of forward propagation of a shift that we don't currently do, right?

[Bug c++/120255] New: C++ template member class parameter name should shadow member name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120255 Bug ID: 120255 Summary: C++ template member class parameter name should shadow member name Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/120255] C++ template member class parameter name should shadow member name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120255 --- Comment #1 from rockeet --- clang compiled the code successfully.

[Bug c++/118590] [14 regression] ICE with acc enter data copyin and dependent types since r14-7033-g1413af02d62182

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118590 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:346f3a27f68fd1c4991193b0faba4198162bbe3d commit r14-11768-g346f3a27f68fd1c4991193b0faba4198162bbe3d Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/118590] [14 regression] ICE with acc enter data copyin and dependent types since r14-7033-g1413af02d62182

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118590 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/120254] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120254 Bug ID: 120254 Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-

[Bug target/120218] [16 Regression] 8% slowdown of 507.cactuBSSN_r on Intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120218 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- I guess for costing changes, too. Since this is a weekly tester, bisecting would help.

[Bug modula2/120188] documented example does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120188 --- Comment #7 from Gaius Mulley --- See PR-120253 for the column starting at 0 bug (rather than 1).

[Bug tree-optimization/120069] [16 Regression] Yes another imagick -march=native -flto -Ofast + PGO regression since r16-270-ga0a64aa5da0af5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120069 --- Comment #10 from Filip Kastl --- I would make a pr for the arm slowdowns but it looks like they disappeared. But do tell me if you think I should report those or feel free to report them yourself.

[Bug modula2/120188] documented example does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120188 --- Comment #8 from Gaius Mulley --- PR modula2/120253

[Bug modula2/120253] Error message column numbers should start at 1 not 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120253 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/120069] [16 Regression] Yes another imagick -march=native -flto -Ofast + PGO regression since r16-270-ga0a64aa5da0af5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120069 --- Comment #11 from Filip Kastl --- I've also just bisected this 2006 lbm -Ofast -march=native -flto PGO AMD Zen3 16% slowdown to r16-270-ga0a64aa5da0af5: https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=474.240.0

[Bug target/120250] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE during RTL pass: dwarf2, in create_trace_edges, at dwarf2cfi.cc:2686 since r12-4475

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120250 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15/16 Regression] |[12/13/14/15/16 Regression]

[Bug ipa/119852] The output of -fdump-ipa-clones can contain "(null)" as the suffix/reason for cloning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119852 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/120260] New: dyld runtime error for gfortran code on Mac OS X Sequoia 15.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120260 Bug ID: 120260 Summary: dyld runtime error for gfortran code on Mac OS X Sequoia 15.4 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/120242] [15/16 regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-9239-g4d7a634f6d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120242 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I'm sure it's a latent issue, possibly a target one.

[Bug tree-optimization/120069] [16 Regression] Yes another imagick -march=native -flto -Ofast + PGO regression (+ wrf and lbm) since r16-270-ga0a64aa5da0af5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120069 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[16 Regression] Yes another |[16 Regression] Yes another

[Bug c++/120247] __builtin_assoc_barrier and binding to a reference type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120247 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- PAREN_EXPR should behave like NON_LVALUE_EXPR, aka it produces an rvalue.

[Bug c++/120243] [15/16 Regression] Exception rethrown from coroutine promise type unhandled_exception not caught under -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120243 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug testsuite/120251] cobol tests depend on locale

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120251 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-13 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/120250] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE during RTL pass: dwarf2, in create_trace_edges, at dwarf2cfi.cc:2686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120250 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target|

[Bug ada/87778] Remove -q quiet option from some GNAT bootstrap command lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87778 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/120251] New: cobol tests depend on locale

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120251 Bug ID: 120251 Summary: cobol tests depend on locale Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: testsuite-fail Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug modula2/120253] New: Error message column numbers should start at 1 not 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120253 Bug ID: 120253 Summary: Error message column numbers should start at 1 not 0 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/120221] Missed optimization related to switch handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120221 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #7) > So this isn't specific for switches. Rather, this is some kind of forward > propagation of a shift that we don't currently do, right? Yes, it's basically an exp

[Bug middle-end/120252] New: -fpatchable-function-entry doesn't work with -ffunction-sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120252 Bug ID: 120252 Summary: -fpatchable-function-entry doesn't work with -ffunction-sections Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/120252] -fpatchable-function-entry doesn't work with -ffunction-sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120252 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/120252] -fpatchable-function-entry doesn't work with -ffunction-sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120252 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 61415 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61415&action=edit A patch

[Bug ada/87778] Remove -q quiet option from some GNAT bootstrap command lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87778 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:940bc09b446f4876563b0986231724121b33193d commit r16-590-g940bc09b446f4876563b0986231724121b33193d Author: Nicolas Boulenguez Date:

[Bug cobol/119377] cobol.dg/group1/declarative_1.cob fails (segfaults, uninitialised vars)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377 --- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Robert Dubner from comment #13) > Thanks. Sadly, that didn't tell me anything useful. > > The front-end code that's failing is slated to be completely eliminated when > Jim gets a chance to wor

[Bug preprocessor/120249] New: Improve handling of comments with -C similarly to clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120249 Bug ID: 120249 Summary: Improve handling of comments with -C similarly to clang Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/86769] [12/13/14 Regression] g++ destroys condition variable in for statement too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86769 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, this had the PR118822 r15-7502 follow-up, so not really sure it is a good idea to backport this.

[Bug gcov-profile/120086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-29.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086 --- Comment #21 from Jørgen Kvalsvik --- Does that mean that the feature detection of atomics, leading to the use BUILT_IN_ATOMIC_FETCH_* is wrong? We use the BUILT_IN for emitting instructions. It could be that it's the detection itself that ne

[Bug c/118868] __builtin_assoc_barrier with pointers cause ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118868 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4fb1b435a65f505b0172b4f0213483c3a07adbf commit r16-599-ge4fb1b435a65f505b0172b4f0213483c3a07adbf Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Mon

[Bug ipa/119852] The output of -fdump-ipa-clones can contain "(null)" as the suffix/reason for cloning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119852 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:168ce6032dd582e39f9ddadcc195fc73f364c4dd commit r13-9654-g168ce6032dd582e39f9ddadcc195fc73f364c4dd Author: Martin Jambor

[Bug target/120263] New: RISC-V: FRM not restored if clobbered via inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120263 Bug ID: 120263 Summary: RISC-V: FRM not restored if clobbered via inline asm Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug modula2/119915] Sprintf1 repeats the entire format string if it starts with a directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119915 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug modula2/115276] libgm2 wraptime.InitTM returns NIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug modula2/120117] ICE when attempting to obtain the MAX of an aliased set type.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120117 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61fada934e894c7fb4a1f1626ea0d0f1f1f1d2f4 commit r15-9677-g61fada934e894c7fb4a1f1626ea0d0f1f1f1d2f4 Author: Gaius Mulley Da

[Bug c++/120262] internal compiler error: in remap_type_1 since version 12.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120262 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/120263] RISC-V: FRM not restored if clobbered via inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120263 Vineet Gupta changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug c++/120126] ICE in GCC with pack-dependent decltype in lambda: cp_type_quals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120126 Simon Martin changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-13 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/120262] internal compiler error: in remap_type_1 since version 12.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120262 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61418 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61418&action=edit Reduced testcase

[Bug c++/120255] C++ template member class parameter name should shadow member name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120255 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/120247] __builtin_assoc_barrier and binding to a reference type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120247 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > Perhaps __builtin_assoc_barrier should lower to NON_LVALUE_EXPR (PAREN_EXPR > (expr)) > or PAREN_EXPR (NON_LVALUE_EXPR (expr)) for C++? > Of course, a big questi

[Bug c++/120247] __builtin_assoc_barrier and binding to a reference type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120247 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/120254] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120254 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/120260] dyld runtime error for gfortran code on Mac OS X Sequoia 15.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120260 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/697494

[Bug modula2/120188] documented example does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120188 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c220b8e7b422ed04b6aaa1b9243b550df913f476 commit r15-9673-gc220b8e7b422ed04b6aaa1b9243b550df913f476 Author: Gaius Mulley D

[Bug modula2/120188] documented example does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120188 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/120261] New: GCC rejects valid constexpr value initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120261 Bug ID: 120261 Summary: GCC rejects valid constexpr value initialization Product: gcc Version: 15.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug libfortran/120196] In findloc2_s* when "back" is true loop goes one more step than needed.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120196 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/118868] __builtin_assoc_barrier with pointers cause ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118868 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/67990] compare() does not sort null characters in locale collation order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67990 --- Comment #2 from Hubert Tong --- POSIX.1-2024 has added a note permitting POSIX interfaces to exhibit "unusual behavior" for locales where does not have the lowest primary weight in the collation ordering: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepub

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a79e30dabb6b3edc29f2656b7d480076a1f4d3bd commit r14-11772-ga79e30dabb6b3edc29f2656b7d480076a1f4d3bd Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:87c7061cc0acc99c8f580d5e76eba288db341807 commit r14-11771-g87c7061cc0acc99c8f580d5e76eba288db341807 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/119903] [13/14/15/16 Regression] non-call exception vs traping comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119903 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|13.4

[Bug libfortran/120196] In findloc2_s* when "back" is true loop goes one more step than needed.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120196 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:627d83c2b196340cccaee8bb4032fade7ad6 commit r14-11773-g627d83c2b196340cccaee8bb4032fade7ad6 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/120191] Functions minloc() and maxloc() ignore the "back" parameter when "kind" is present.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120191 --- Comment #14 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c12443e824cf96311db7a1be82b3626909c8ceeb commit r14-11770-gc12443e824cf96311db7a1be82b3626909c8ceeb Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/120254] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120254 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---

  1   2   >