[Bug libgomp/120194] USM offloading vs. 'libgomp.c++/declare_target-1.C'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120194 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- > ... this is ill-formed OpenMP? For 'requires unified_shared_memory', you are in the realm of un(der)specified behavior as OpenMP does not even mention how this case is handled. If you do (A) - or (B.1) +

[Bug debug/120051] [15/16 regression] codeview ICE/segfault starting with 15.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120051 --- Comment #13 from Christoph Reiter --- We found another crash in gegl. I'll try to reduce later.

[Bug rtl-optimization/92080] Missed CSE of _mm512_set1_epi8(c) with _mm256_set1_epi8(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92080 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/92080] Missed CSE of _mm512_set1_epi8(c) with _mm256_set1_epi8(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92080 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/120209] New: [SH] Float constant 1.0 is loaded from constant pool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120209 Bug ID: 120209 Summary: [SH] Float constant 1.0 is loaded from constant pool Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug tree-optimization/111479] [12/13 regression] aarch64 SVE ICE: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:248

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111479 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/111479] [12/13 regression] aarch64 SVE ICE: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:248

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111479 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/111478] [12 Regression] aarch64 SVE ICE: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:250

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111478 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 111479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/120208] -Wmaybe-uninitialized with -O2 obviously wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120208 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #1) > While I am at it, I wonder > how to ask gcc to ignore the > #lineno directives in a > preprocessed input. I've found > -P to not generate them, but > if they are

[Bug tree-optimization/120208] -Wmaybe-uninitialized with -O2 obviously wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120208 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- It is not exactly scan is the issue but what is assigned to scan. Both start and newstart are initialized conditionally. And it seems like it is hard to figure out if the conditions at which they are set are

[Bug tree-optimization/120208] -Wmaybe-uninitialized with -O2 obviously wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120208 Kael Franco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kaelfandrew at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug debug/120207] print_rtl_single_with_indent is undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120207 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Component|middle-end

[Bug debug/120207] print_rtl_single_with_indent is undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120207 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/120212] New: : Optional empty repetitions should not match

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120212 Bug ID: 120212 Summary: : Optional empty repetitions should not match Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/120197] ICE in GCC with decltype(cout << a) in default function parameter leads to recursive diagnostics with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120197 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/117184] m2 fails with "terminate called after throwing an instance of 'unsigned int'" with LRA on alpha

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117184 --- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- This bug still exists on gcc-16.

[Bug c/120208] New: -Wmaybe-uninitialized with -O2 obviously wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120208 Bug ID: 120208 Summary: -Wmaybe-uninitialized with -O2 obviously wrong Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/120208] -Wmaybe-uninitialized with -O2 obviously wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120208 --- Comment #1 from Stas Sergeev --- While I am at it, I wonder how to ask gcc to ignore the #lineno directives in a preprocessed input. I've found -P to not generate them, but if they are added, then locating the problematic spot in a preproces

[Bug fortran/120163] [15/16 Regression] Can not import module containig call to pure routine via abstract interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120163 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/120080] [16 regression] ICE when building llvm-20.1.3 (find_bit_tests, at tree-switch-conversion.cc:1799) since r16-347-g1381a5114788a2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120080 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Filip Kastl : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:358a5aedf2b5b61f4edfc7964144355a4897dbb9 commit r16-513-g358a5aedf2b5b61f4edfc7964144355a4897dbb9 Author: Filip Kastl Date: Sat M

[Bug tree-optimization/120080] [16 regression] ICE when building llvm-20.1.3 (find_bit_tests, at tree-switch-conversion.cc:1799) since r16-347-g1381a5114788a2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120080 Filip Kastl changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug debug/120207] New: [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] print_rtl_single_with_indent is undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120207 Bug ID: 120207 Summary: [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] print_rtl_single_with_indent is undefined Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgomp/120194] USM offloading vs. 'libgomp.c++/declare_target-1.C'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120194 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- Hmm, actually, it looks as if I have already implemented (B.2) in GCC 15+ in libgomp/target.c's gomp_load_image_to_device: if (is_link_var && (omp_requires_mask & (GOMP_REQUIRE

[Bug preprocessor/119753] gcc -E is not POSIX-compliant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119753 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > IMNSHO it is POSIX that should be fixed. Clearly they've added a > requirement there that doesn't match what the compilers actually do (GCC, > clang, ICC (bo

[Bug target/120209] [SH] Float constant 1.0 is loaded from constant pool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120209 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug cobol/119335] cobol frontend ignores -M

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119335 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/120051] [15/16 regression] codeview ICE/segfault starting with 15.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120051 Iouri Kharon changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61379|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/120197] ICE in GCC with decltype(cout << a) in default function parameter leads to recursive diagnostics with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120197 --- Comment #2 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- Bisection: r10-7361-gfddfd3ce555965

[Bug fortran/120049] ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED ()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049 --- Comment #26 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Have you tried to move some of the checks *after* the resolution stage? The checks in check.cc are invoked rather early. Maybe look into trans-intrinsic.cc (conv_isocbinding_function)?

[Bug target/111107] i686-w64-mingw32 does not realign stack when __attribute__((aligned)) or __attribute__((vector_size)) are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=07 --- Comment #45 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Yong : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee7c0a5b70dc316477f45abc0f09dd2af9abe5cb commit r16-511-gee7c0a5b70dc316477f45abc0f09dd2af9abe5cb Author: LIU Hao Date: Tue Apr

[Bug fortran/120163] [15/16 Regression] Can not import module containig call to pure routine via abstract interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120163 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- Patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-May/062123.html

[Bug middle-end/120207] print_rtl_single_with_indent is undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120207 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- It was never used except for print_rtl_single . Added with https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/CABu31nMr3UPWBjGMCKqZ-EhgJoEZZFXx9h=9lry2o5su1ek...@mail.gmail.com/ It was going to be used in https:

[Bug middle-end/120207] print_rtl_single_with_indent is undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120207 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13/14/15/16 Regression] |print_rtl_single_with_inden

[Bug cobol/119335] cobol frontend ignores -M

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119335 --- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch --- That's totally fine if those are _really_ the files read-in as copybooks (if they were opened with an extension, then of course this should be in).

[Bug middle-end/120207] print_rtl_single_with_indent is undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120207 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug middle-end/120207] print_rtl_single_with_indent is undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120207 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 61395 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61395&action=edit Patch which I am testing

[Bug middle-end/109996] csmith: -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing causing run time trouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109996 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/109996] csmith: -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing causing run time trouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109996 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- (In reply to mcccs from comment #5) > Created attachment 61396 [details] > adapted for trunk and older GCCs and Clang, removed warnings > > Here's the a little bit hand-simplified version (I mostly removed redu

[Bug tree-optimization/120210] New: [12/13/14/15 Regression] std::array like class gives an maybe-uninitialized warning on size() function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120210 Bug ID: 120210 Summary: [12/13/14/15 Regression] std::array like class gives an maybe-uninitialized warning on size() function Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug cobol/119769] FE: GnuCOBOL extension BINARY-C-LONG missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119769 James K. Lowden changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/120211] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-loop-ivcanon -fno-tree-pre -fno-code-hoisting" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in gimple_

c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 16.0.0 20250510 (experimental) (GCC) [591] % [591] % gcctk -O3 -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-loop-ivcanon -fno-tree-pre -fno-code-hoisting small.c during GI

[Bug fortran/120193] Incorrect debug info for unsigned(kind=1) and unsigned(kind=4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120193 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:512371d786e70d27dbaef38d60e9036c11f458c6 commit r16-516-g512371d786e70d27dbaef38d60e9036c11f458c6 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sa

[Bug middle-end/120207] print_rtl_single_with_indent is undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120207 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > > Created attachment 61395 [details] > > Patch which I am testing > > -/* Like print_rtx, except specify a file. */ > +

[Bug fortran/102891] Passing real part of complex type component using w%z%re to a subroutine gives erroneous value of dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102891 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94fa992b60e53dcf807fc7055ab606d828b931d8 commit r16-518-g94fa992b60e53dcf807fc7055ab606d828b931d8 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Tu

[Bug c++/120174] ICE (Segfault) in GCC when passing array of class to generic lambda taking decltype of lambda with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120174 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Reduced testcase: ``` auto t = [](decltype([](){}) &){}; ```

[Bug c++/120174] ICE (Segfault) in GCC when passing array of class to generic lambda taking decltype of lambda with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120174 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #4 from

[Bug c++/119916] [15/16 Regression] folly (2025.04.14.00 and earlier): coroutine tests fail with GCC 15 since r15-3153-g68ee624bc52ba1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119916 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/120174] ICE (Segfault) in GCC when passing array of class to generic lambda taking decltype of lambda with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120174 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||c++-lambda Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/107430] [meta-bug] lambda in decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107430 Bug 107430 depends on bug 120174, which changed state. Bug 120174 Summary: ICE (Segfault) in GCC when passing array of class to generic lambda taking decltype of lambda with -std=c++20 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120174

[Bug c++/120174] ICE (Segfault) in GCC when passing array of class to generic lambda taking decltype of lambda with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120174 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/99505] ICE Segmentation fault when decltype lambda in parameter list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99505 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.rodriguezb1 at um dot es --- Comme

[Bug middle-end/109996] csmith: -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing causing run time trouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109996 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/120051] [15/16 regression] codeview ICE/segfault starting with 15.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120051 --- Comment #15 from Christoph Reiter --- Thanks, that seems to have fixed the babl build. Because I already had it, a reduced example: $ cat test.c // gcc -O2 -gcodeview -c test.c typedef long a; typedef int b; int c(void *, void *, a); b d()

[Bug tree-optimization/120211] [16 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with "-fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-loop-ivcanon -fno-tree-pre -fno-code-hoisting" on x86_64-linux-gnu:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120211 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/119907] ICE in tsubst_expr, at cp/pt.cc:21973

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119907 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-11 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug testsuite/119909] gcc.dg/torture/pr119131-1.c fails since r15-7974-g0bbdffc5d4f723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119909 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug testsuite/119909] gcc.dg/torture/pr119131-1.c fails since r15-7974-g0bbdffc5d4f723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119909 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfb61bf309ed207694a97adabc454bfd0936b269 commit r16-522-gbfb61bf309ed207694a97adabc454bfd0936b269 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Sat

[Bug middle-end/120217] New: FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/p2770r0.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120217 Bug ID: 120217 Summary: FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/p2770r0.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug target/120217] FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/p2770r0.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120217 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/120217] FAIL: std/ranges/adaptors/p2770r0.cc -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120217 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Never mind. It was caused by my local changes.

[Bug fortran/119928] [15/16 Regression] Bogus "Interface mismatch" in gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_52.f90 with -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119928 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Thomas Koenig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b38bab21a126512c17c8084ad78b6bf75fc1437 commit r15-9650-g7b38bab21a126512c17c8084ad78b6bf75fc1437 Author: Thomas Koenig

[Bug fortran/120163] [15/16 Regression] Can not import module containig call to pure routine via abstract interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120163 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Koenig : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:004bf889e0b1b96ae50f93339104d3602a88deb5 commit r16-525-g004bf889e0b1b96ae50f93339104d3602a88deb5 Author: Thomas Koenig Date: Su

[Bug fortran/119928] [15/16 Regression] Bogus "Interface mismatch" in gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_52.f90 with -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119928 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/109996] csmith: -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing causing run time trouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109996 --- Comment #7 from mcccs at gmx dot com --- Thank you Sam for the prompt reply and clear instructions. I was going to do that but before it printed anything it aborted. I think the issue is INVALID because on this line: static union U3 g_979 _

[Bug rtl-optimization/92080] Missed CSE of _mm512_set1_epi8(c) with _mm256_set1_epi8(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92080 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61392|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug cobol/119632] section segments (cobol85) not implemented, "ignored" -> raising compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119632 --- Comment #6 from James K. Lowden --- Taking a cue from Iain, the output is now: $ gcobol OB/OBIC2A.cbl OB/OBIC2A.cbl:131:24: warning: SECTION segment ‘30. ’ was ignored 131 | 013000 SECT-IC219-

[Bug debug/120051] [15/16 regression] codeview ICE/segfault starting with 15.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120051 --- Comment #16 from Christoph Reiter --- (In reply to Christoph Reiter from comment #15) > Thanks, that seems to have fixed the babl build. ah, I meant the gegl build.

[Bug rtl-optimization/101995] [12/13/14 Regression] regression built-in memset missed-optimization arm -Os since r9-3594

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101995 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/119699] fnspec for constructors/deconstructors don't say they return this when targetm.cxx.cdtor_returns_this () returns true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119699 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > > Yes because REG_RETURNED does not work always. I will file a new bug for > > that. > > PR 120214 . > > As for t

[Bug target/120215] New: [16 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr78794.c scan-assembler pandn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120215 Bug ID: 120215 Summary: [16 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr78794.c scan-assembler pandn Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/120216] New: openmp unified shared memory currently requires pageableMemoryAccess perhaps managedMemory would suffice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120216 Bug ID: 120216 Summary: openmp unified shared memory currently requires pageableMemoryAccess perhaps managedMemory would suffice Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0

[Bug debug/120051] [15/16 regression] codeview ICE/segfault starting with 15.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120051 --- Comment #18 from Christoph Reiter --- (In reply to Iouri Kharon from comment #17) > (In reply to Christoph Reiter from comment #16) > > (In reply to Christoph Reiter from comment #15) > > > Thanks, that seems to have fixed the babl build. >

[Bug fortran/120049] ICE when using IS_C_ASSOCIATED ()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049 --- Comment #27 from kargls at comcast dot net --- On 5/10/25 06:21, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049 > > --- Comment #26 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Have you tried to move some of t

[Bug debug/120051] [15/16 regression] codeview ICE/segfault starting with 15.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120051 --- Comment #17 from Iouri Kharon --- (In reply to Christoph Reiter from comment #16) > (In reply to Christoph Reiter from comment #15) > > Thanks, that seems to have fixed the babl build. > > ah, I meant the gegl build. And did you apply the

[Bug middle-end/118072] [14/15/16 Regression] (n%7) sometimes uses udiv and sometimes does not depending on if `n/7` is used beforehand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118072 mcccs at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcccs at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/119897] Conversion to any integer type succeeds, when should be ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119897 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-10 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/119897] Conversion to any integer type succeeds, when should be ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119897 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- So GCC, EDG and MSVC all agree that the code is not ambiguous when there is `operator bool` (or operator int). Only clang disagrees with the above case. EDG does not think it is ambiguous even without the

[Bug c++/33990] bug in lookup of member template conversion operator for pointer to member functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33990 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#954 and https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#545 look related

[Bug c++/89580] template conversion operator not considered for operator == of pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89580 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#954 Looks related.

[Bug c++/118277] g++ ICEs with depedent inline-asm string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118277 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/92080] Missed CSE of _mm512_set1_epi8(c) with _mm256_set1_epi8(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92080 --- Comment #15 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba9d228a92057d3b839e7ea32b12c93fcfc5ff1e commit r16-519-gba9d228a92057d3b839e7ea32b12c93fcfc5ff1e Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun May 11 06:

[Bug c/120213] New: analyzer report a false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120213 Bug ID: 120213 Summary: analyzer report a false positive Product: gcc Version: 15.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c A

[Bug target/117839] Redundant vector XOR instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117839 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba9d228a92057d3b839e7ea32b12c93fcfc5ff1e commit r16-519-gba9d228a92057d3b839e7ea32b12c93fcfc5ff1e Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun May 11 06:

[Bug c++/59465] [11/12/13 Regression] g++ allows direct-initialization of an array of class type from another array in a mem-initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59465 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.5|14.0

[Bug cobol/119337] cobol: gcobc wrapper should deduce output name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119337 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a3f5aac402a7ef721e1e832f96ed77ec21f5a25c commit r16-520-ga3f5aac402a7ef721e1e832f96ed77ec21f5a25c Author: Robert Dubner Date: Sa

[Bug analyzer/120213] analyzer report a false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120213 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >Also the output seems a little bit corrupted: That looks like a cmake issue and not a GCC issue. See https://godbolt.org/z/P4WbhT4Ee

[Bug analyzer/120213] analyzer report a false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120213 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- I can't reproduce that corrupted output. Did you get that from a CI system or something like that?

[Bug c++/120128] Excesive output in recursive lambda composition, that can lead to g++:fatal error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120128 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug analyzer/120213] analyzer report a false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120213 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Raffaello Bertini from comment #3) > (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > > I can't reproduce that corrupted output. Did you get that from a CI system > > or something like that? > > no i

[Bug analyzer/120213] analyzer report a false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120213 --- Comment #3 from Raffaello Bertini --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > I can't reproduce that corrupted output. Did you get that from a CI system > or something like that? no i had that from the embedded terminal of the IDE VsCode

[Bug analyzer/120213] analyzer report a false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120213 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > I would complain to VScode because it is works just fine for other terminals > that implement ascii control characters with UTF-8. Oh XScode should be using the

[Bug c++/120124] "g++: fatal error: Killed signal..." when reporting error involving very complex lambda type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120124 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||c++-lambda Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug analyzer/120213] analyzer report a false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120213 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- Looks like it doesn't default to UTF8: https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode/issues/19837.

[Bug c++/119699] fnspec for constructors/deconstructors don't say they return this when targetm.cxx.cdtor_returns_this () returns true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119699 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #2) > FTR I tried this based on your suggestion: > diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc > index a785d5e79cb..a709bde8f15 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc > +++

[Bug rtl-optimization/120214] New: REG_RETURNED Does not always work for stack addresses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120214 Bug ID: 120214 Summary: REG_RETURNED Does not always work for stack addresses Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: norm

[Bug target/118518] gcc 14.2.1 nvptx cross compiler complains about alias definitions in a struct with two constructors that are not aliases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118518 --- Comment #15 from Benjamin Schulz --- Hi there, my recent openmp version of the code seems to compile now (after a small change) executes without error on gcc 15.1 on gpu. So I now think about whether I have to re-convert some of it back

[Bug c++/118590] [14 regression] ICE with acc enter data copyin and dependent types since r14-7033-g1413af02d62182

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118590 --- Comment #13 from Benjamin Schulz --- Thanks. Works with 15.1

[Bug testsuite/119909] gcc.dg/torture/pr119131-1.c fails since r15-7974-g0bbdffc5d4f723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119909 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de014484f013225bc32bc6eeb11e44038925ae1b commit r15-9648-gde014484f013225bc32bc6eeb11e44038925ae1b Author: Andrew Pinski

[Bug testsuite/119909] gcc.dg/torture/pr119131-1.c fails since r15-7974-g0bbdffc5d4f723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119909 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/120208] -Wmaybe-uninitialized with -O2 obviously wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120208 Kael Franco changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61394|0 |1 is obsolete|

  1   2   >